Well around 330h played i think, almost 3.8k achi points and still play most nights with mates, quite a few people say diablo 3has bad end game yet there is no end game to speak of. Inferno isnt something that fall into the normal deff of end game.
On a positive note, Zakaz i think picture post above after reading the cat fight proberly made my day.
I just wanted to clear up something. When someone says Diablo is broken or operates flawlessly; that's an opinion, not a fact. If someone thinks the game is broken, that's perfectly fine. The matter is opinionated, and as such it is up for interpretation. Whether they want to explain why they feel that way is up to them.
With that said, IMO parts of the game are broken. And to me, the few broken systems the game has have really negatively affected the end game and the overall re-playability.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"I believe in the sand beneath my toes. The beach gives a feeling, an earthy feeling. I believe in the faith that grows, And the four right chords can make me cry. When I'm with you I feel like I could die, and that would be alright"
I just wanted to clear up something. When someone says Diablo is broken or operates flawlessly; that's an opinion, not a fact. If someone thinks the game is broken, that's perfectly fine. The matter is opinionated, and as such it is up for interpretation. Whether they want to explain why they feel that way is up to them.
With that said, IMO parts of the game are broken. And to me, the few broken systems the game has have really negatively affected the end game and the overall re-playability.
To clarify - you're wrong. By definition an opinion is:
1. abelief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty; A view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
Stating something is broken is just that: a statement. A statement is a declaration of the state or condition of something, otherwise known as fact. An opinion, while sometimes based on facts, is not a fact itself, which is why it is called an opinion. As such, a statement cannot be an opinion.
With that out of the way, stating the game is broken is absolutely, positively, not an opinion. If you do make that statement, and you do not explain why you believe that to be the case, you are subject to mockery based on your unabashed use of hyperbole entirely for the sake of being dumb on the internet.
I really cannot fathom why this matter is such a difficult concept to grasp.
I just wanted to clear up something. When someone says Diablo is broken or operates flawlessly; that's an opinion, not a fact. If someone thinks the game is broken, that's perfectly fine. The matter is opinionated, and as such it is up for interpretation. Whether they want to explain why they feel that way is up to them.
With that said, IMO parts of the game are broken. And to me, the few broken systems the game has have really negatively affected the end game and the overall re-playability.
To clarify - you're wrong. By definition an opinion is:
1. abelief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty; A view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
With that out of the way, stating the game is broken is absolutely, positively, not an opinion. If you do make that statement, and you do not explain why you believe that to be the case, you are subject to mockery based on your unabashed use of hyperbole entirely for the sake of being dumb on the internet.
Did you really just go out of your way to look up the definition of an opinion?
Simply put, (and in my own words, not Websters) a fact is something that is indisputable and agreed upon. Is saying, 'the game is (not) broken' not a subjective matter? It's up for discussion, there is no absolute 'yes' or 'no'. The answer rest with the individual. Why are we muddling the argument? I don't know if you're having a bad day, but you're coming across as arrogant and hostile. Either way, this isn't really either here nor there in regards to Diablo. Lets not stray from the argument . . .
If you want me to give you the laundry list of reasons why this game has very little longevity and replay value, I will. If you want me to describe why some of the systems are broken, I will. But I don't see the point, as you likely will not read into what I'm saying and you'll spend your efforts trying to debunk every one of my valid points. You're not going to convince me that this game is polished, and I'm not going to convince you that this game was a let-down. Agree to disagree.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"I believe in the sand beneath my toes. The beach gives a feeling, an earthy feeling. I believe in the faith that grows, And the four right chords can make me cry. When I'm with you I feel like I could die, and that would be alright"
I just wanted to clear up something. When someone says Diablo is broken or operates flawlessly; that's an opinion, not a fact. If someone thinks the game is broken, that's perfectly fine. The matter is opinionated, and as such it is up for interpretation. Whether they want to explain why they feel that way is up to them.
With that said, IMO parts of the game are broken. And to me, the few broken systems the game has have really negatively affected the end game and the overall re-playability.
To clarify - you're wrong. By definition an opinion is:
1. abelief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty; A view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
With that out of the way, stating the game is broken is absolutely, positively, not an opinion. If you do make that statement, and you do not explain why you believe that to be the case, you are subject to mockery based on your unabashed use of hyperbole entirely for the sake of being dumb on the internet.
Did you really just go out of your way to look up the definition of an opinion?
Simply put, (and in my own words, not Websters) a fact is something that is indisputable and agreed upon. Is saying, 'the game is (not) broken' not a subjective matter? It's up for discussion, there is no absolute 'yes' or 'no'. The answer rest with the individual. Why are we muddling the argument? I don't know if you're having a bad day, but you're coming across as arrogant and hostile. Either way, this isn't really either here nor there in regards to Diablo. Lets not stray from the argument . . .
If you want me to give you the laundry list of reasons why this game has very little longevity and replay value, I will. If you want me to describe why some of the systems are broken, I will. But I don't see the point, as you likely will not read into what I'm saying and you'll spend your efforts trying to debunk every one of my valid points. You're not going to convince me that this game is polished, and I'm not going to convince you that this game was a let-down. Agree to disagree.
You don't get to just make definitions up. I went out of my way to look it up because you're being thick in the skull and refuse to simply accept that people making statements are not voicing their opinion, but spewing verbal diarrhea out of emotional distress over something as simple as a game.
If you or anyone else wish to make their opinion known, be my guest. However, when you do so, do it in a constructive manner or not at all. That's my point, and everyone else who is telling people who are exaggerating conditions to shove off.
There are no semantics being argued here. If you wish to list your grievances without blowing them out of proportion, please do so. I will happily discuss them in the manner they are presented. If they are all "this game is trash," don't expect an elaborate response in return.
This happened to me when I played D2. I grinded out the game and then realized there was nothing left to do. Nowhere to explore or anything. It happens.
Is anyone who has played this game 200+ hours still enjoying this game? I've leveled every class to 60, beat Diablo on Inferno (softcore), and have grinded about ~80% achievement points (3,200 total). But man, I don't know if you could pay me to play another hour.
If you want me to give you the laundry list of reasons why this game has very little longevity and replay value, I will.
Don't worry man, going on forums and bitching about a game has almost infinite replay value. Blizzard should charge you a sub to do it! They'd make millions!
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
On a positive note, Zakaz i think picture post above after reading the cat fight proberly made my day.
Was abit bored with SC... changed to HC last week and its a hole new game (no RMAH to fuck it up...). Starting Act II Inferno atm!
BerserkPT#2797
Battle.net profile
but i want blizz to fix AH (search for ALL possible affixed, increase mas value we can search for above 999)
With that said, IMO parts of the game are broken. And to me, the few broken systems the game has have really negatively affected the end game and the overall re-playability.
To clarify - you're wrong. By definition an opinion is:
1.
a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty; A view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
Stating something is broken is just that: a statement. A statement is a declaration of the state or condition of something, otherwise known as fact. An opinion, while sometimes based on facts, is not a fact itself, which is why it is called an opinion. As such, a statement cannot be an opinion.
With that out of the way, stating the game is broken is absolutely, positively, not an opinion. If you do make that statement, and you do not explain why you believe that to be the case, you are subject to mockery based on your unabashed use of hyperbole entirely for the sake of being dumb on the internet.
I really cannot fathom why this matter is such a difficult concept to grasp.
Did you really just go out of your way to look up the definition of an opinion?
Simply put, (and in my own words, not Websters) a fact is something that is indisputable and agreed upon. Is saying, 'the game is (not) broken' not a subjective matter? It's up for discussion, there is no absolute 'yes' or 'no'. The answer rest with the individual. Why are we muddling the argument? I don't know if you're having a bad day, but you're coming across as arrogant and hostile. Either way, this isn't really either here nor there in regards to Diablo. Lets not stray from the argument . . .
If you want me to give you the laundry list of reasons why this game has very little longevity and replay value, I will. If you want me to describe why some of the systems are broken, I will. But I don't see the point, as you likely will not read into what I'm saying and you'll spend your efforts trying to debunk every one of my valid points. You're not going to convince me that this game is polished, and I'm not going to convince you that this game was a let-down. Agree to disagree.
You don't get to just make definitions up. I went out of my way to look it up because you're being thick in the skull and refuse to simply accept that people making statements are not voicing their opinion, but spewing verbal diarrhea out of emotional distress over something as simple as a game.
If you or anyone else wish to make their opinion known, be my guest. However, when you do so, do it in a constructive manner or not at all. That's my point, and everyone else who is telling people who are exaggerating conditions to shove off.
There are no semantics being argued here. If you wish to list your grievances without blowing them out of proportion, please do so. I will happily discuss them in the manner they are presented. If they are all "this game is trash," don't expect an elaborate response in return.
Edit - know, known, psh.
I am still enjoying the game
Don't worry man, going on forums and bitching about a game has almost infinite replay value. Blizzard should charge you a sub to do it! They'd make millions!