The only way they could make an enjoyable game with a plausible storyline is if D3 took place before D1, and told the story of the horardrim and how the soulstone came to be under the monastary.
i would like it but no b/c i gotta know what tryeal mean when he said that destroying the worldstone would change our world for ever but i would like it if they make another series forcing on diablo sin wars
I agree with Moonek. I'm curious to see what Tyreal meant when he said that. All this long I've assumed that the ending to D2 is the most open-end ending ever. A prequel, for me personaly, ain't music to my ears.
Although it is a good idea. Out of the box for sure.
Just think, if they made it a prequel them would would have to wait another 6 years to see the end of the bloody story.....so no......
Maybe they could make the fourth one a prequel. Finish the story in number three and then when no one expects it WHAM! Here is another diablo!
But would they have to make the prequel with graphics that are worse than d1? Because if not then the heirachy of the games would be all weird and shit
it might just be me, but i hate it when prequels have better stuff than the originals and no explaination as to why this stuff isnt available in the originals.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
Yeah but it wouldn't be a prequel if the game was made before the original would it?
I guess they could always just have one playable character in the prequel or make the characters deckard cain (sorcerer), Griswald (warrior), and Farham (ranger)
Something like that. They could make the prequel about the event leading upto tristram and how diablo came to be within the cathedral. There are so many things that could implement. King Leoric, Lazarus, the butcher, that wizard from the catacombs (lvl 5 - 8). How wirt lost his leg and Griswold (the warrior) saved him!
Actually now that I think of it a prequel would be awesome for Diablo 4.
That is it I am gonna get on blizzards case right now!
it might just be me, but i hate it when prequels have better stuff than the originals and no explaination as to why this stuff isnt available in the originals.
thats not to say i dont play them, i enjoy most games that are like this, Devil May Cry for example (the third game has stuff not in the first), it just irrates me some what.
i would go for a diablo game set during the Sin War, or the Capture of the Three, and play as members of the Horadrim and meet NPCs like jehred Cain, or Tal Rasha or play as people from the time of Que Hagen and Kalim it could be called Diablo:Imprisonment of Evil, i would just prefer that the third game in the series be a sequel to Lord of Destruction rather than a prequel to diablo 1
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
Yeah but it wouldn't be a prequel if the game was made before the original would it?
I guess they could always just have one playable character in the prequel or make the characters deckard cain (sorcerer), Griswald (warrior), and Farham (ranger)
Something like that. They could make the prequel about the event leading upto tristram and how diablo came to be within the cathedral. There are so many things that could implement. King Leoric, Lazarus, the butcher, that wizard from the catacombs (lvl 5 - 8). How wirt lost his leg and Griswold (the warrior) saved him!
Actually now that I think of it a prequel would be awesome for Diablo 4.
That is it I am gonna get on blizzards case right now!
That's what I was getting iat, I just didn't have time cos I was at school..
But would they have to make the prequel with graphics that are worse than d1? Because if not then the heirachy of the games would be all weird and shit
They don't have to make the prequel with worse graphics.
If you think about it, the Horadrim were at full force before Diablo I, and there was a lot more lore and spells and weapons, hence, a prequel would fit this game.
an idea for d4...Go back to the beginning, good vs evil (u can choose...maybe...comments), u get to be archangels who have their own special abilities and stuff...and u can be Satans minions or diablo or wat ever.
comments...threats?
p.s. will add more wen i can....i think theis period in time was the great conflict(title?) or the sin war...have 2 read those passages again
Back to Tristram...Hoorah!
Although it is a good idea. Out of the box for sure.
Maybe they could make the fourth one a prequel. Finish the story in number three and then when no one expects it WHAM! Here is another diablo!
But would they have to make the prequel with graphics that are worse than d1? Because if not then the heirachy of the games would be all weird and shit
I guess they could always just have one playable character in the prequel or make the characters deckard cain (sorcerer), Griswald (warrior), and Farham (ranger)
Something like that. They could make the prequel about the event leading upto tristram and how diablo came to be within the cathedral. There are so many things that could implement. King Leoric, Lazarus, the butcher, that wizard from the catacombs (lvl 5 - 8). How wirt lost his leg and Griswold (the warrior) saved him!
Actually now that I think of it a prequel would be awesome for Diablo 4.
That is it I am gonna get on blizzards case right now!
thats not to say i dont play them, i enjoy most games that are like this, Devil May Cry for example (the third game has stuff not in the first), it just irrates me some what.
i would go for a diablo game set during the Sin War, or the Capture of the Three, and play as members of the Horadrim and meet NPCs like jehred Cain, or Tal Rasha or play as people from the time of Que Hagen and Kalim it could be called Diablo:Imprisonment of Evil, i would just prefer that the third game in the series be a sequel to Lord of Destruction rather than a prequel to diablo 1
That's what I was getting iat, I just didn't have time cos I was at school..
Also...no, not also, you covered everything lol..
They don't have to make the prequel with worse graphics.
If you think about it, the Horadrim were at full force before Diablo I, and there was a lot more lore and spells and weapons, hence, a prequel would fit this game.
an idea for d4...Go back to the beginning, good vs evil (u can choose...maybe...comments), u get to be archangels who have their own special abilities and stuff...and u can be Satans minions or diablo or wat ever.
comments...threats?
p.s. will add more wen i can....i think theis period in time was the great conflict(title?) or the sin war...have 2 read those passages again
ill take my chances
and thats wat my idea is...heaven vs hell and u can choose wat path 2 follow at the start....light or dark