No its not, theres nothing neat about being bi or homosexual or heterosexuel or whatever, its just having a personal sexual preference, nothing neat about it, just "normal and plain". I really don't get whats so neat about bi's or homosexuals being social about their sexual orientation and thinking its neat is sexist.
I meant, it's neat that I know he's bi. I have this knowledge that he's comfortable enough to be honest in the kind of society that's quite hateful towards it. It's not sexist by the way. And yes, it's taboo in alot of our society, it's not quite "normal and plain".
Gosh man. It's NEAT he's comfortable about telling people he's gay. In a society like ours, it takes a real man to be honest about themselves. I'm not saying he's comfortable about a hateful society, I'm saying he's comfortable enough with himself to disregard our hateful society. You're weaving my sentences into my other sentences.
Being gay or bi is not "normal" since it defeats the concept of procreating. It defies nature. I'm not saying it's wrong, and it's not because I care how you feel about me or anything, I just don't care enough about the topic to give two shits one way or the other.
I won't say whether it's right or wrong. Just abnormal.
My family is really religious except for my brother and I. Funny thing is, my mom is a protestant and my dad is a Christian and the same for their parents. I have to go to church sometimes and I can't eat meat on Friday’s or something like that. I would sit in church as a kid and think that what if Jesus fought is way out of Jerusalem and ...
I'm going off topic here, but the point is. I don't like religion, but I don't hate it neither except for Christianity. (They imposed that on everyone, native Americans, Africans, Chinese ...everyone they came in contact with.) Don't impose it on me and we won't have problems.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I like the life I lived, because I went from negative to positive.
You know very well who you are, don't let them hold you down, reach for the stars.
This is the 3rd time I've seen the term "unnatrual" become misinterpreted. It doesn't mean, not a part of nature. Something can be unnatrual and still exist in nature. It's defined by: Inconsistent with an individual pattern or custom. Homosexuality is "unnatrual" and "abnormal" to our society. If everything in existence was "normal". How could we ever define "abnormal".
Anyways, I think this is annoying link. Perhaps a different thread.
That sounds like complete and utter horseshit, an "individual pattern" does not define "each and every pattern of a whole natural society", if it would then nature would be full of clones and evolution would simply not exist, plus a "custom" can mean a whole lot of things. You have "cultural customs', "religious customs", "moral customs" and "natural customs", again, the simple fact that homosexuality has always existed and always will exist and that there are even complete "one sex" species and even species "that change sex" is enough of evidence to suggest "homosexuality" is completely "normal".