I feel that the art needs some work. Why do tombs look like you are on a sky-scraper complex? Colors have too much contrast, i.e stuff looks brand new in an ancient tomb...
That was the new church of Tristram. It looked new because it was only a few years old.
Overall it was a 3/5 for me. It just wasn't as dark like the first Diablo as I was hoping. That and all the video was just mob after mob. I could vote it lower but seeing as its still being worked on I'll keep it at average :p.
I voted 4/5 though because Barbarian has always been my favorite class and watching him slaughter those mobs was awesome ^^.
4/5 wont get a 5/5 till i see necro and pali (if they bring them back)
Witch Doctor is most likely replacing the necro
1.Barb
2.Witch D (performs exactly like a necro but is updated)
3.Zonish class (probably going to be called "Ranger" as zons are female only)
4.Sorc class
5.Pally
also lol at "Needs to be darker" // New prince of persia looks 10000x better because it is stylized and not dark , dark shadows do not make a good game (doom 3 == bust, hl2 == god)
and also lolmoar at "MUSIC IS LAZY LOL I AM RETARDED" Oh yea, the demo with the guy talking and the cinematic that is just a teaser trailer is all the music you are going to hear
because d3 is coming out tommorow don't you know!
oh wait... it isn't
also, d3 being non-mmo (yes you may ban me) means blizzard is currently working on a mmo (lost vikings online???) so sorry WAR/AOC/etc fans sc2->d3->nextgenmmo is a timeline that can only be defeated by epi3->portal2(its coming)->hl3/hlonline
and even more also, Worms Armageddon has terrible textures, gfx, colors, but is still better than crysis on very high
get it through your 12yearold brains, GRAPHICS != GOOD GAME
Looks awesome, better combat, and more than two skills can be used simultaneously! its a miracle! XD. Health pick ups are such an improvement over stacking 30 pots on your char every 10 minutes. looks great to me, cant wait.
I didn't like the graphics at all. Sometimes lesser graphics would work out for the better, especially in this case. I wasn't too fond of some of the names that they implemented into the game; Witch Doctor and Thousand Pounder to be exact. To add on to the visual portion, it is far too bright. I shouldn't have to turn my contrast all the way down to 0, it's Diablo for crying out loud! It should be darker than any other game out there.
Hopefully my thoughts will change. I, like many Diablo fans, have waited too long for a Diablo game, so I hope they stop trying to take ideas from WoW and put them into the Diablo franchise.
And it may be due to me simply getting older, but I wasn't in awe when I watched the cinematic or gameplay, I was definitely interested and wanted to play but I didn't find myself being swallowed whole by the game which worries me and takes another point off. The fact that I did not think Diablo 3 when I first saw the game play video also disturbed me, I thought I was watching a preview for another game.
Diablo III looks amazing thus far. We haven't seen even a fraction of the skills, monsters, items, levels, or online play. This game should be absolutely breathtaking. Hopefully Blizzard doesn't ruin the storyline. So far, things are sketchy with the story. It's been 20 years and already people think of Diablo I and II as a legend? C'mon. Get back on track and make the story simple.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
I voted 4/5 though because Barbarian has always been my favorite class and watching him slaughter those mobs was awesome ^^.
USWest Ladder - Vindicate
Witch Doctor is most likely replacing the necro
1.Barb
2.Witch D (performs exactly like a necro but is updated)
3.Zonish class (probably going to be called "Ranger" as zons are female only)
4.Sorc class
5.Pally
also lol at "Needs to be darker" // New prince of persia looks 10000x better because it is stylized and not dark , dark shadows do not make a good game (doom 3 == bust, hl2 == god)
and also lolmoar at "MUSIC IS LAZY LOL I AM RETARDED" Oh yea, the demo with the guy talking and the cinematic that is just a teaser trailer is all the music you are going to hear
because d3 is coming out tommorow don't you know!
oh wait... it isn't
also, d3 being non-mmo (yes you may ban me) means blizzard is currently working on a mmo (lost vikings online???) so sorry WAR/AOC/etc fans sc2->d3->nextgenmmo is a timeline that can only be defeated by epi3->portal2(its coming)->hl3/hlonline
and even more also, Worms Armageddon has terrible textures, gfx, colors, but is still better than crysis on very high
get it through your 12yearold brains, GRAPHICS != GOOD GAME
The Barbarian looks dumb as hell and so does the witchdoctor.
The Barbarian looks dumb as hell and so does the witchdoctor.
It wasn't perfect, but what it confirmed to me is that the wait for it to be released is going to be excruciating.
You could easily get that argument out of anything, may it be Diablo 1, Diablo 2 or Diablo 3
"Ahh, fresh meat!"
- The Butcher
I didn't like the graphics at all. Sometimes lesser graphics would work out for the better, especially in this case. I wasn't too fond of some of the names that they implemented into the game; Witch Doctor and Thousand Pounder to be exact. To add on to the visual portion, it is far too bright. I shouldn't have to turn my contrast all the way down to 0, it's Diablo for crying out loud! It should be darker than any other game out there.
Hopefully my thoughts will change. I, like many Diablo fans, have waited too long for a Diablo game, so I hope they stop trying to take ideas from WoW and put them into the Diablo franchise.
The graphics are OK.
And it may be due to me simply getting older, but I wasn't in awe when I watched the cinematic or gameplay, I was definitely interested and wanted to play but I didn't find myself being swallowed whole by the game which worries me and takes another point off. The fact that I did not think Diablo 3 when I first saw the game play video also disturbed me, I thought I was watching a preview for another game.
Is it time to play yet? I'll be taking a time-out from the world when it is released.