if anyone is wondering what happened to the warrior rogue and sorcerer from d1 here you go
According to Diablo II, the canon hero who defeated Diablo in Tristram was a Warrior: the wanderer who is posessed by the Lord of Terror is clearly a man, ruling out the Rogue. His skin is pale, edging away from the dark-skinned Sorcerer, and in the opening cutscene, the wanderer leans on a sword, the weapon most closely associated with the Warrior. and we all know what happens after that, warrior decomes diablo, then is killed by you
Blood Raven (the corrupted Rogue from the first act of Diablo II) was evidently the Rogue in the first Diablo game. Kashya's rogue scouts say that their captain was in the battle with Diablo at Tristram and was corrupted by Andariel soon after.
Summoner (the corrupted Mage from the second act of Diablo II) was evidently the Sorcerer in the first Diablo game. After you defeat him Cain says he remembered that there was a Vizjerei who fought against Diablo and assumes that he was corrupted.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
it is one of the tasks of the members of silversurfnstudism(silverism) to educate people about diablo, show them things that they may have missed or misunderstood
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
hmm havent been reading your scriptures then i assume, lol
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
silver? hm i think you are mistaken, oh wait no your not, without silver there wouldnt be silversurfnstudism, which i am a part of, and part of that religion is learning about the world of sanctuary. so yeh good going silver
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
the guys that surround him are tougher than he is.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
maybe you should, it a little wierd going back and playing diablo 1 mechanics are all different
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
According to Diablo II, the canon hero who defeated Diablo in Tristram was a Warrior: the wanderer who is posessed by the Lord of Terror is clearly a man, ruling out the Rogue. His skin is pale, edging away from the dark-skinned Sorcerer, and in the opening cutscene, the wanderer leans on a sword, the weapon most closely associated with the Warrior. and we all know what happens after that, warrior decomes diablo, then is killed by you
Blood Raven (the corrupted Rogue from the first act of Diablo II) was evidently the Rogue in the first Diablo game. Kashya's rogue scouts say that their captain was in the battle with Diablo at Tristram and was corrupted by Andariel soon after.
Summoner (the corrupted Mage from the second act of Diablo II) was evidently the Sorcerer in the first Diablo game. After you defeat him Cain says he remembered that there was a Vizjerei who fought against Diablo and assumes that he was corrupted.