I've missed the monetization part, but I doubt it'd be anything further than cosmetics.
Also the game is not even in alpha. I doubt we'll see it sooner than 3 yrs, many things can and will change by then.
So I don't see why you think this is all to it. Also you miss the part that it has different skills system and talents.
It is nothing innovative that's for sure, but I'd prefer something that fits everything that is proven good and enjoyable than some experiments like they did with D3 vanilla.
Look, I’m not saying the game looks bad. I’m saying it looks good.. it’s just annoying that blizzard should’ve had this game out as D3 in the first place. It shouldn’t of taken over 20 years to get to this point. The darker themes, PVP. Skill trees , ect. Should’ve all been in D3. And since the graphics aren’t improved at all, this game looks like it literally should’ve been the real D3.
I understand what you mean. But look at it this way: they've got a lot of information by failing with D3, that way they've been able to put these things that you feel like should've been already there in D4. It is really objective, If they knew all this I'm pretty sure you would've had the D3 you're talking about.
I've missed the monetization part, but I doubt it'd be anything further than cosmetics.
Also the game is not even in alpha. I doubt we'll see it sooner than 3 yrs, many things can and will change by then.
So I don't see why you think this is all to it. Also you miss the part that it has different skills system and talents.
It is nothing innovative that's for sure, but I'd prefer something that fits everything that is proven good and enjoyable than some experiments like they did with D3 vanilla.
Game is really behind in development and for me looks like D3 with a new engine, graphics-wise.
But for me gameplay and features are more important than graphics, so i seriously don't get why would you complain about that.
Also being an open world and seemingly able to hold more players at one place it is a good thing that the game can be run on higher range of PCs.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I understand what you mean. But look at it this way: they've got a lot of information by failing with D3, that way they've been able to put these things that you feel like should've been already there in D4. It is really objective, If they knew all this I'm pretty sure you would've had the D3 you're talking about.
I've missed the monetization part, but I doubt it'd be anything further than cosmetics.
Also the game is not even in alpha. I doubt we'll see it sooner than 3 yrs, many things can and will change by then.
So I don't see why you think this is all to it. Also you miss the part that it has different skills system and talents.
It is nothing innovative that's for sure, but I'd prefer something that fits everything that is proven good and enjoyable than some experiments like they did with D3 vanilla.
Game is really behind in development and for me looks like D3 with a new engine, graphics-wise.
But for me gameplay and features are more important than graphics, so i seriously don't get why would you complain about that.
Also being an open world and seemingly able to hold more players at one place it is a good thing that the game can be run on higher range of PCs.