DiabloFans

Quote from sicness»

Quote from Darkrealmx»

Again, they have a product because we buy it. Since when has it been okay for businesses to do whatever they deem as right and that consumers have no say/input into what they want? You think that is entitlement, but I think that is consumerism. Entitlement is not the same and perhaps before you label something as such maybe you might want to educate yourself on this first. Why do you think billions of dollar are spent each year by companies to get input and do consumer testing? Sorry, but entitlement is the idea of getting something you want without having to earn it. Like most who care to spend enough time posting in a forum we have spent thousands of hours on their games and pay for them I believe this should at the very least give us a voice but not necessarily the decision in the final product.

Not every game has to have consumer input, and that input isn't always helpful. In fact most of the time it isn't helpful at all. In this case however, it is entitlement because you're no longer providing Blizzard money to develop Diablo 3. It's not something earned, it's given by the developers. Just because you paid for D3 doesn't mean you're entitled to have developers listen to your opinion. Just because you've played their games for thousands of hours doesn't mean you've earned it either. It's up to them to decide whether you have or not. I mean really, you make it sound like they owe you something for you playing their games so much, that just seems backwards to me.

Yeah I didn't want to recommend bounties because they would naturally run them in a party, which would set them up for failure as other party members run around like jolly green giants one-shotting all the pet gobs. Lol.
I went with my not-so-secret pennant agenda instead.

The goblin post was a good read. I always find posts like that interesting. So much more thought goes into things like this then one could imagine. I like it and since posting things like that doesn't effect game development, balancing or content its fine and great that they write things like that. Makes you understand more of the thought progress behind a game, which is great!

Ah, finally found the Cursed Chest in Drowning. Were no problem almost failed due to having to much attack speed which made sweeping wind fall off, twice... some precious seconds wasted without noticing.

I guess I just needed some motivation. Thank you!

Accessible chests yes.

In coop, if I am in front, yes.

In coop, if I am behind, no.

Yellows to Legendary is by far the easiest way. Craft the yellow and save any you pick up.

I suppose if you had about a thousand forgotten souls you could gather enough bounty mats. My character has almost 2000. But I don't think you need to go that route for your first bow.

Quivers are a better way to spend blood shards.

Quote from oldschool_2o4f»

Yeah, get three very good wizards to run it while you sit in town to click Orek. Was quite tight time wise.

Thank you again Fragstar!

I totally agree as a 1400+ para I never shy'ed from playing with sub 500 para running sub 60 grift. I take that moment and use my theory craft build and beside they are graftfull that someone can carry them and upgrade their gems

I make weird build and try to push as far as I can with them. Probably the only way I still enjoy the endless grind !

I would say that your re-roll would depend on your CDR, as this weapon (and presumably, build) requires constant usage of soul harvest. By minimising downtime on the skill, you maximise your dmg (and likely also defensive) bonus. I wouldn't really bother re-rolling the +dmg as suggested above, as there is not much to be gained (+3 on the min roll and +43 on the max roll). Keeping in mind that this is ancient and has good stats all around, I would assume that it will not be replaced/scrapped for a very long time; given this I would say that you can afford to favor capped stats (i.e. AS, CDR, Elite Dmg) over uncapped stats (main stat, vit). In other words, assuming CDR will still benefit you, I would re-roll the int to CDR and focus on paragon to make up the int loss.

If losing the int doesn't appeal to you, then I would suggest re-rolling the AD, as the stat itself can be boosted by a significantly higher margin than the competing +dmg stat.

(1940 - 1897) 43 (missing max roll) / 1940 (highest max roll) * 100 = ~2.21% increase

(24 - 18) 6 (missing AD roll) / 24 (highest AD roll) * 100 = 25% increase

It can be difficult to directly compare +dmg with AD, as +dmg will provide a constant bonus, while AD will provide multiple instances of a dmg bonus, but only on proc. Personally, I would favor the AD due to tendencies towards high density environments, which increases the likelihood and effects of AD procs. I should also mention that the likelihood of rolling 24% AD is substantially higher than rolling 1560 - 1940 +dmg (you will probably never get this, ever).

Watch these things be right under our noses!!! lol...Remember the old adage - "the best place to hide something is right in the open". Perhaps, we're overthinking something that, in the end, we're gonna punch ourselves in the face and go " JEEEZ, that was SIMPLE!!"

Pay no mind to me, I'm just an old fart....sometimes I just blurt out shit for no reason!