I love the cold weather.
Sorry I haven't played this weekend guys spent a lot of time with my girlfriend. Yesterday we celebrated 10 years of relationship, it was awesome
- LinkX
- Registered User
-
Member for 16 years, 4 months, and 19 days
Last active Sat, Jan, 24 2015 18:42:07
- 36 Followers
- 6,260 Total Posts
- 63 Thanks
-
1
Zero(pS) posted a message on Ultimate Random Chat Thread [URT] v4Posted in: Off-Topic -
1
Lt._Venom posted a message on Ultimate Random Chat Thread [URT] v4I got a Beta Key as well. After about an hour in, I just couldn't keep playing it. Diablo III didn't have that Diablo feel that you get with Diablo I and Diablo II.Posted in: Off-Topic -
1
Daemaro posted a message on Ultimate Random Chat Thread [URT] v4Well... I can see how the general idea of the words is fine and dandy, but I went out of my way to turn it into innuendo and people still gobbled it up. I actually ended up getting more likes later on until finally I had to just come out and post this picture.Posted in: Off-Topic
Before people more people started to realize and actually read the words instead of just trying to interpret the meaning. -
1
Bullkathos1928 posted a message on Diablo 3 substituteD3 is a incomplete game...Posted in: Off-Topic
in 2013 you will live to play diablo 3.(but diablo 2 will be always a better game, becouse its the better game in the world and forever...oinf2ng2i342-9)
belive me. -
1
Siaynoq posted a message on Ultimate Random Chat Thread [URT] v4As per the futility of debating the existence of God on the internet, I'll just reassert this fact: Star Trek is the only true religion.Posted in: Off-Topic -
2
Siku posted a message on Windows 8 for gamingI think i'm going to stick with the 2 OS theory and wait for Windows 9:Posted in: Off-Topic
Win95: Huge improvement over 3.1, but filled with bugs
Win98: It's a smoother, faster, bugfree Win95.
WinME: Horrible
WinXP: Removed bloat/fat, smoother, faster version.
WinVista: Beyond Horrible
Win7: Removed Bloat/fat, smoother, faster version.
If history serves...yeah i'm staying with my 7 Ultimate until Win9. -
1
CherubDown posted a message on ENTIRE ACT 1 now available for Beta testingI don't even know what to do about this...Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
*Goes to consult the rulebook* -
1
falcompsx posted a message on Prove to me that your God exists.Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)Quote from Umpa
I think there are absolute truths by definition. But as far as having knowledge of anything other than math and a square having to be a square in order to be a square, there is no way to know that a solipsistic view on the universe isn't valid. If you think you know something, you have not explored what it means to know something.
Maybe go do some research of your own on consciousness and where it stands today in the scientific and philosophical fields! To keep things short, I will simply say that I believe consciousness to be the essence of a person that is a real thing. And I believe this. I do not know it. That's important to say because I want to stress that I don't think I know it in the slightest. I would elaborate on how I reached that conclusion if it wasn't in a stale thread. Maybe if it was framed in a way that was more compelling. Like a new thread.
I guess to me, i find philosophy completely and utterly pointless. Its a personal thing, and no offense intended in any way. I believe what there is evidence for, something tangible. I believe in time, whether years, decades, or even centuries from now, as the human brain(and brains in general) are better understood in how they function, consciousness will be defined, in a scientific way, no different then that laws of physics, or math. The belief that this is possible is to me what makes pursuit of scientific knowledge a worth while cause. To me, conciousness is only a function of the brain and its complexity which we have only begun to scratch the surface of knowing how it all works. -
6
Jetrall posted a message on Logo Contest Winner!To everyone attempting to claim that there was no victor in the logo competition or that they deserve some sort of prize or compensation because no logo was chosen to represent DiabloFans.com, I say:Posted in: Off-Topic
What the hell, man? Why you trying to steal my thunder?
The staff of DiabloFans clearly picked their favourite to represent the site and it currently adorns the top header of the page - just as it has for years.
In other words, the winner is me and I'd appreciate if everyone else stopped trying to downplay that and complain that no winner was chosen.
Bah humbug!
/ Troll -
1
Molster posted a message on New Site Design?Posted in: Site FeedbackQuote from LinkX
Quote from Molster
Yeah the images missing are due to the upgrade, they always have to be reset.
For the avatar, on page 2 or 3 I explained a trick to get it to work.
if that trick dosnt work, go into a thread (like this one) at the top right, clck your avatar, it should pop up with a thing to change it, select the one you want, the click CROP (but just hit ok, dont crop it) then click ok..seemed to work for me.
Additionally, you can click your avatar at the top right of the page where your avatar comes up. The same window comes up.
The avatar just doesn't change.
Edit: Actually, if you refresh the site, it works. I'm going to just sit over here and shut up now. >.>
=P its not you don't worry ,its being worked on. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
1
1
I am so glad the Great Deku Tree let us have internet finally...
1
Only place where white, 9 foot tall bipedal American Aliens named Jimmy are discussed is in the prestigious universities of Holywood and 4chan. >.>
It's funny because NASA already realized what you are saying about a decade ago and started looking at things like Jupiter's Moons for possible life....
What we view as intelligent would be defined by us. Another species elsewhere may not deem us as intelligent, but that is their definition. It's the same as what I call a biscuit and what a British person calls a biscuit are two different things.
Now, when you say a few thousand years, you mean between 150,000 and 250,000 years, right? As for the possibility of a species more intelligent then us reaching out, we will not contact them, they will be the ones to contact us.
We have a very good understanding of the four forces that control everything in the universe. It's also a testament to the Universe that the Standard Model works on Earth just as it does everywhere else in the Universe. If it didn't we wouldn't know that another galaxy was headed towards the Milky Way Galaxy, or that other galaxies in the past have already hit us.
The first thing that a Scientist learns is that his/her sight, sound, and touch lie, and lie badly. We have instruments designed to give us a better understanding that would simply not be possible otherwise. As for assuming it is right until proven otherwise, the moment you say something in the Scientific world, everybody attempts to prove you are wrong. Remember, nobody got famous for agreeing, only for disproving.
When Science finds things that defy a law, it takes to the task of figuring out what is wrong with the law.
As for our eyes, I just said that Scientists are trained to not trust their eyes, not on the micro-level nor on the macro-level.
No... Just...no...
The fact that you have an image of the entire universe means that, by definition, it is a finite universe. You...just proved yourself wrong...
Why?
Apparently Darwin also said that Jesus is the son of god, as did Einstein./sarcasm
But on a serious note, the universe was commonly accepted as 8,000 years old because the BIble said so. We have moved past mythology and understand that humans have been around for 150,000 to 250,000 years. That is a fact. Period.
Laws are built around facts that we have found, like the Law of Thermodynamics or the Law of Refraction or the Law of Electromagnetism or etc. These are facts. They have been proven time and time again to work. If you want to disprove them, get a Ph.D., study and understand them, and then disprove them. Otherwise hush.
Your views that you have been saying have sounded very Biblical to be honest. I can understand why he was curious.
As for Science and Religion being the same, that's akin to saying that an apple is the same as a television... I don't know how else to explain that... I wish I could explain it better, but I can't explain it better then that. It's that simple....
It's been accepted as fact that the Scientific Method is heavily flawed? Got any citations? (No, priests and religious fanatics don't count.)
The universe doesn't really care if you believe Gravity exists, the Law of Gravity will continue to work and keep your ass safely on the Earth.
When/If we find such anomalies, we then turn and figure out why Science says otherwise. Are we looking at them wrong, or are our equations wrong? Then we fix shit. That's how Science works.
I don't know the weight or size of the President of the United States, and I doubt you do either, would you say that he is infinite?
Society did jack diddly squat.
Religion, on the other hand, fucked Galileo up. Newton was a Christian so he was safe. Einstein lived in a time where he could believe in a Spinozan God (not an actual god, fyi) and not be killed by the church.
Citations or you are just making wild speculation.
Apply for the right grants and find the people that want what you want and you got funding. It's not as political as you make it out to be.
1
Quiet, dinner!
1
Yes?
Aww...
No.
Evil...
You gonna die, son.
I think I won the most useless post award with this...
1
Lies. 80% are men, 10% are FBI agents, and 10% are catholic priests trying to connect with little boys.
This is the truth.
I'm going to hell.
1
1
Ahh, another internet idiot that thinks he knows everybody.
See what I did there?
You know, I laughed at this.
I got the beta, and I still don't want 5,000 threads of the same thing. You can get your beta key by posting in a thread somebody else makes. (Or, here's an idea, post because you like the community instead of "Omg, liek I luv diablo! Betakeypls!"
Additionally (And you can ask my guild), I have never, ever used Gearscore. It limits your ability to play and your guild's ability to play. Back in Wotlk when I was running a guild, I even banned it. Too much e-peen. Kinda like you.
And I'm one of those >6k post guys who got a beta key from dfans and still doesn't like idiots cluttering up the forums. Why? Because idiots are cluttering up the forums, trying to whore themselves out for a key to a beta.
And, just so we are clear:
The Proposed plan of action would not keep key whores from getting keys. That is NOT the purpose of the idea. The purpose of the idea is to keep the site from having 5,000 threads of the same damn topic. You and every other key whore can still whore yourselves out to get your keys.
Calling us snobs without even understanding what we are suggesting...
DISCLAIMNER: NOTHING IN THIS POST IS INTENDED TO BE OFFENSIVE. IF ANYONE IS OFFENDED BY THIS POST, THE AUTHOR OF THIS POST EXTENDS HIS DEEPEST APOLOGIES TO THE OFFENDED PERSON OR GROUP.
1
My stance has come from an objective look at the world. I don't think I said my stance was objective? (Maybe I did? My memory becomes worse and worse every day...) Anyway, my stance is anything but objective. That being said, if there was empirical evidence of the existence of the god of the Bible, Quran, TaNaKh, or Bagavad Gita, then I would convert to that religion immediately. The chances of that evidence ever showing up, though, are very very slim from what I can tell. But if it does, I'll be the first to say that I was wrong.
I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understand the difference in information and knowledge?
And Christianity is not alone. I have similar views of Islam as well. I am currently studying Judaism and Hinduism. If either of them make sense and agree with the world, then I will convert. If they are in opposition to the world, then I will laugh at them. This is the only way I can deal with absurd claims.
Actually, reverse the roles. Religion is the football player, and I am the geek. The difference is that Atheists (the geeks) are finally starting to go to the gyms and bulk up.
Well, Richard Dawkins has a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 is absolutely believe in any deity, and 7 is absolutely no belief in any deity. He puts himself at 6.5, but I do disagree with him. I'm closer actually to 6. While I think there is no deity, and I am almost 100% certain there is no deity, I cannot know for certain, and the uncertainty is enough to keep me wondering. Does that make sense?
I don't think I am picking on anybody?
That's...not cool...
Go somewhere else and talk about that, because that's not right. There are very good people that are Christian, just as there are very good people that are black.
Very, very uncool dude.
1
I take it Diablo 3 hasn't been released yet, eh?