- Registered User
Member for 12 years, 1 month, and 8 days
Last active Fri, Jul, 7 2017 14:56:12
- 0 Followers
- 95 Total Posts
- 4 Thanks
Jul 4, 2008I think if they were going to do a console version of any of their franchises they'd best rework the game structures for it. (Like what they were doing with StarCraft Ghost before it became vaporware, turning an RTS in a TPS or whatever)Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
Dunno what they would do in Diablo's case though.. making an isometric Action-RPG is definitely viable on a console, and with XBL you wouldn't even really need a Battle.net or a monthly fee (just a yearly fee of course). Actually I think that would be pretty kickass, except for the gay fact you'd be paying for all the small downloadable content they'd release.
Or maybe it would horribly suck, who knows.
Jul 4, 2008Visko posted a message on Whats could be some Xbox 360 achievements for Diablo 3? (on the slim chance, for fun)Xbox Achievements are fun.. except the stupid ones like "Kill all the Flying Rats in the City" uhh.. go fuck yourself?Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
20 pts - Complete entire game in under X amount of hours (Normal, Nightmare, and Hell)
Jul 4, 2008Maybe they'll listen to the fanbase in wanting a darker atmoshper, and instead of reworking the game and what they have now.. they're start throwing darker and more sadistic things at us in acts 3 4 and 5 (maybe 2 if they haven't already done a lot on it) since they're apparantly already done Act 1... tho.. bunnies and rainbows still gonna be akward..Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
Jul 4, 2008Nope, wouldn't even buy the game. If I wanna play Single-player it would be easy to get the game for free (and I would), but if I'm being forced to pay to play online for what might only be a month or so before I get bored (depending on how good the game is) then no, that's just pointless then. And if I'm not playing online, I'd probably get bored after 2 or 3 weeks, so definitely wouldn't even buy the game and would label Blizzard as a pos company and probably stop caring about any of there games...Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
SC2 looks like it will be moderately fun, look forward to unravelling the story. Competitive online play that they're constantly developing around and delaying the game for isn't even an interest to me, the only online I'd be interested in is UMS maps.
Then it would be this Diablo MMO wanna-be crap..
Then at last is the MMO of Warcraft, worst turn for the Warcraft series ever. Altho they did probably need a seperate genre to seperate Starcraft and Warcraft, MMO was just gay though... but hurray it made the company money, and nowadays that's all this industry is about sadly.
Jul 4, 2008Posted in: Diablo III General DiscussionQuote from "Okibum" »D3 certainly needs a unique gameplay. no point in reverberating back to an old way. But an open battle world would make it WoW. It needs something that makes it special. Maybe a combination of how Guildwars has the towns with everyone in them and a party window for going out into the world, with the classic D2 outside town world or something.
Lol I was thinking that, they only really way I could see em pullin it off is like Guild Wars, and then I remembered how much Guild Wars sucked so I probably still wouldn't play D3.
And to expand on my opinion here, it's because the Towns are far too overpopulated (even with different channels). I don't want big massive towns (for all I know they might be in D3) but the point is, I don't want to be running back and forth for like 2 minutes going from one vendor to another to do things and squeezing my way through 100 others doing the same to just buy potions and repair my armor and get the next quest... ugh once again would just ruin the immersiveness of the Diablo universe.
Jul 4, 2008Visko posted a message on A suggestion that might appeal to the color problemPosted in: Diablo III General DiscussionQuote from "SithDiablo" »
They need to also reduce bunnies, rainbows, lushful trees.... those are what causes the Biggest problem, making Diablo 3 look like a Kids game, rather than a Mature Horror game.
I don't know, I think it would be great to keep them. Just, when the monsters come bursting out of the ground, they set ablaze the ground and the tree's become incinerated and the bunnies get squashed.. don't know about the rainbow though, maybe they should get rid of that.
Jul 4, 2008Visko posted a message on A suggestion that might appeal to the color problemPosted in: Diablo III General DiscussionQuote from "Genesis" »These 4 slidey bars should be found in the Video Options
That basically solves all graphical problems
That would be almost perfect!
Jul 4, 2008I loved MH for the fact you could find out where the enemies were a lot easier. (like in Cow levels) without having to run around like a chicken with its head chopped off, you could just hop straight into the battle by going in the RIGHT direction. THOUGH, for a first time through the game I would not want something like that. So basically, the map revealed when completing the game would do nothing for me. I'd just play the entire game through each difficulty and enjoy it. Then load up a MH to do everything else with.Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
Jul 4, 2008Posted in: Diablo III General DiscussionQuote from "Skohsl" »So 4000 hours of WoW has given you the insight of comparing two games to each other, while other people who use screenshots and movies to make the comparison cannot...?
I'd say so, because someone who's played that much could basically memorize the entire game and compare every aspect of every place in the world to what they might see in Diablo 3. Whereas people looking at screenshots, only get that one comparison of the screenshot. Speaking of which, a lot of the dungeons in WoW use Green/Blue to create a "dark" atmosphere.. I see Diablo following that fantastic idea as well!
Jul 4, 2008At OP:Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
I'm sure everyone else is already bashing you for saying WoW is better then Diablo 2, when in fact it's really not. They're completely different styles of gameplay. In their fields, Diablo hasn't really been beaten yet because every company that seems to try to make a good Action-RPG always fails, whereas WoW seems to be the top MMO as well. You people need to stop crossing Genre's and always say "Every game needs to be MMO!" Because they don't. I don't play either game anymore, but if I was to return to either, I'd definately pick D2, because it is WAY more fun than WoW for a pick-up and play game. I think you need to loosen your addiction buddy.
Jul 3, 2008Posted in: Diablo III General DiscussionQuote from "Marshal" »hey i wanna hear some ideas on the d3 line since the necromancer has been tooken 4 evil then maybe he's been tooken outa the picture and replaced by a bad ass vampire (similer to blood ryne ^_0) skills will be like automatics(this is like the blood gun in blood rayne so it wont be all like m16s or oozie)/black magic(kinda similer 2 assasin with fade also new stuff like increase spead and flight or e z escape were u use a tp with out goin 2 inventory and u tele 2 town from n e were and /ss like da druid except u can transform into a bad ass bat with mooves like blood drain(it involves ll so kinda like rabies and LT put together) and bat attack (name in progreess) where each lvl (its like ravens) the more bats and it sends all bats to attak with u wich is also sweet. i just saw underworld 2 so u no im hype on vamps also blood ryne 2 is also cool i would add slow time but thats just unfair.;)
Your grammar makes me want to kill someone...
Jul 3, 2008Visko posted a message on How many diablo fans hate World of Warcraft? Please voteI hate WoW, I didn't always though... For like 2 years I played that game on and off, mostly with family. For an MMO it's not bad I don't think, it's more the fact I hate MMO's nowadays now that I really see them for what crap they are.Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Nov 5, 2015Visko posted a message on New CM and Statement on Botting, D3 Schedule at BlizzconPosted in: News
Put it this way. They're doing what they can, and always have been. They say anything more elaborate, they jeopardize their efforts. The simplest and kindest way they can say "We're on it, but you can only expect so much".
No offense to Kauza, but his statement on botting is one of those that made me say, "well no shit." I don't think anyone in this forum thinks that botting is really a legitimate activity in the game. I think they want more frequent action taken to reduce its use.
I think a more meaningful statement would have been talking about things like YOLO Mouse and TurboHUD. There are always discussions posted here where the player base is split on if it is legit and/or punishable to use tools like that. He could have made a powerful statement by posting a much more encompassing statement on this clause within their terms of service.
However, I am glad to see that they have a new leader running the team and hope that he does some great things for their community.
I'd go on to say "The only way you'll really get their attention on bots, is if thousands and thousands of players start quitting for simply that reason." Then of course they'd HAVE to focus more of their efforts on stopping bots.... However, I'd near-guarantee you that thousands and thousands and thousands more players would probably stop playing once the content/seasons or whatever else had to make a cutback to put more effort into this department affordably. Also, unlike some people, I don't envision these people sleeping on bags of money at night, but instead working tirelessly and hard to create this.
Jul 15, 2014Visko posted a message on Depth Diggers Changes Explained, Fetish Counters, Tempest Rush Changes, Paragon Levels on UEE, Play Your Way ThursdaysThat mini-conduit buff... Wish it was Holy Damage and not Lightning Damage...Posted in: News
Sep 6, 2008Posted in: NewsQuote from "InvincibleEMP" »I was looking at all the prizes, and i read the costume one last being that its the least likely contest i would ever consider entering, and this cracked me up:
LOL I would hate to get first place and miss out on the area51 that 2nd and 3rd got.
Wow, no kidding.. who the hell cares about a giant sword? Well I mean that's cool and all but compared to entire computer? I don't see why Runner up Prizes would be worth more than the grand prize, that seems a bit backwards... Grand should come with the Notebook too
Aug 21, 2008If I was to make one suggestion for Diablo 3, it would be to include more than a story mode for multiplayer. Such as an Onslaught mode or something, where you and your friends prepare for wave after wave monsters progressively getting harder. Or like a bottomless dungeon, getting harder and harder as you go down kind of resembling Diablo 1. To just give you something to do after completing the story, maybe unlockable after beating Hell mode or such.Posted in: News
In this way, if you want to play a game with your friends you don't have to constantly recreate rooms to farm bosses or the such, as every few levels of the dungeon or every few waves a competant boss would be faced while keeping the game always new and refreshing in a way.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.