• 0

    posted a message on Best US States
    @ sanctus

    Ha, I wish there were bases in Canada I could go to!
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Best US States
    Quote from "Siaynoq" »
    I didn't know you had any choices at all. I thought they just sent you where they felt like it. My mom goes to McCord once a month for reserves and she really likes the Washington area.

    I think things may have changed. Fr'instance my dad (who was in active duty years ago) was surprised that I even had a choice of what job I wanted.

    I've always liked the idea of living in the pacific northwest. I'm more of a mountain/forest person than ocean (too many things that can kill and devour me).

    All I know is I wanna get far, far away from Indiana.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Best US States
    I recently joined the Air Force and will be leaving for basic at an indeterminate time in the future. I'm trying to figure out where I'd like to be stationed because during basic I'll fill out my base preferences stateside and overseas (8 each).

    So I'm wondering what states you guys have been to (or live in) that you really like, and why. Any input on the overseas locations would be appreciated too.

    Here are my options.
    http://www.airforce.com/baseloc/index.html

    Washington and Germany are my top choices for each as of now.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on 4 Max Players!?!
    I think 4 player max is a good idea. Beyond 4, it's hard to understand what's going on (think Baal's throne). It's also hard to have a good time just talking to other people with so many people potentially clogging the chat.

    Sure there are issues for dueling and trading games, but 4 is a good number for actually playing the game.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Time loops are the key to immortality?
    Quote from "Lydeck" »
    @ Phrozen

    Yeah, it looks that way, but we don't know for certain. (Like those people going the speed of light 'look' to be going slow :P).

    I mean, there's no matter outside of galaxies, and between galaxies. Just a black vacuum iirc. How do we know that light cannot go EVEN FASTER outside of galaxies? Think of it like running in water (going through all kinds of matter) to running down a street in the open (no matter). :P

    I hope that made sense.

    The speed of light in a vacuum is what we mean by the speed of light, c. It's just understood. Interestingly, scientists have managed to make light slow to the speed of a bicycle by passing it through a substance at temperatures just above 0 Kelvin.

    Anyways, of course we can't be sure that the theory is absolutely correct, but just remember that all it takes for a scientific theory to require revision is one piece of experimental evidence suggesting it's wrong. Since general relativity's inception in the 1910s, it has predicted experimental outcomes to remarkable accuracy consistently. The first confirmation of the theory came when it accurately predicted the degree that distant starlight bent around the sun due to gravity.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Item Identity
    What was D1's system?
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Time loops are the key to immortality?
    Here's a section of The Elegant Universe explaining more about this. Muons are basically heavy electrons.

    "When sitting at rest in the laboratory, muons disintegrate by a process akin to radioactive decay, in an average of about two millionths of a second. This disintegration is an experimental fact supported by an enormous amount of evidence. It's as if the muon lives its life with a gun to its head; when it reaches two millionths of a second in age, it pulls the trigger and explodes apart into electrons and neutrinos. But if these muons are not sitting at rest in the lab and instead are traveling through a particle accelerator that boosts them to just shy of light-speed, their average life expectancy as measured by scientists in the lab increases dramatically. This really happens. At 667 million miles per hour (about 99.5 percent of light speed), the muon lifetime is seen to increase by a factor of about ten. The explanation, according to special relativity, is that "wristwatches" worn by the muons tick much more slowly than the clocks in the lab, so long after the lab clocks say that the muons should have pulled their triggers and exploded, the watches on the fast-moving muons have yet to reach doom time."
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Time loops are the key to immortality?
    Quote from "Lydeck" »
    Um ... what? This makes no sense to me.

    If something is 4 light years away from our planet (relatively), and you travel at the speed of light to get there in 4 years, and spend another 4 years getting back, then how does the Earth go ahead decades? It'd only be 8 years.

    It's like saying something is 100 miles away, and traveling at 100 miles per hour it takes one hour to get there. You spend one hour getting there, and another hour getting back.

    Maybe I'm not understanding what you mean. But that absolutely makes no sense to me.

    It's time dilation. With relativity, Einstein discovered that there is no absolute time. Every observer has their own clock that applies only to them.

    It has been experimentally verified that clocks running in a gravity field or traveling quickly run more slowly relative to non-moving clocks/ clocks further from the gravity. Yes, clocks on planes run slowly relative to clocks on the ground. It's just by such a tiny amount that we don't really notice it.

    Einstein said that all objects move through spacetime (three spatial dimensions + time) at the speed of light. Therefore, most of our motion through spacetime is always dedicated to time. The more quickly you travel through space, the less you can travel through time since you're limited to the speed of light for all four dimensions. If you travel at 99% the speed of light, you're barely dedicating anything to travel through time. People on earth would view your clock as running very, very slowly.

    I hope I managed to make that mess^ make sense lol...

    Edit: In other words this :D
    Quote from "Kenzai" »
    Lydeck, i think much weirder physics rules apply when you travel ridiculously long distances with ridiculously high speed, but to be honest i dont have much of an idea on how its exactly is either and i think i will just read a bit in Wiki. LOL
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Time loops are the key to immortality?
    This whole thread reminds of of the movie Waking Life - a bunch of people talking about really intense shit.

    Aging - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgsC4YtM8AM&feature=PlayList&p=EAD2BA262C8FF8CC&index=5

    Free Will & Physics - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VxQuPBX1_U&feature=PlayList&p=EAD2BA262C8FF8CC&index=0
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Player Generated Content, or...
    Quote from "Ivaron" »
    More like Ladder/Non-ladder/Custom.
    You should be able to do hardcore custom games after all :)

    Good point. I must have been out of the Diablo loop for longer than I thought.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Player Generated Content, or...
    I think it would be pretty cool. As long as it had its own mode. SC/HC/Custom
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Time loops are the key to immortality?
    Actually time travel in the forward direction is not only possible, it's pretty simple. Just a matter of engineering and desire. All you have to do is travel at a significant fraction of the speed of light for some time.

    Say you travel to Alpha Centauri, the closest star system to our solar system at about 4 light years away. You take a little over 8 years to go there and back, traveling at 99% the speed of light. The Earth you would come back to wouldn't be Earth 8 years after you left it. It would be decades in the future, thanks to relativity.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 1

    posted a message on How will you play DIII?
    1. Install.
    2. Read books.
    3. Spend seven minutes deciding which char to try.
    4. Spend twelve minutes coming up with a name.
    5. Get to level ~15.
    6. Realize I screwed up something.
    7. Spend four minutes debating whether to restart.
    8. Decide to try different character.
    9. Repeat from step 3 until all chars have been tried.
    10. ????
    11. PROFIT!
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Time loops are the key to immortality?
    Quote from "Kenzai" »

    My lack of fate?
    Yeah its disturbing but its just the conclusion i came to.
    Something in Wiki just drew my attention. Those "axiom"s...
    Its something we just assume is true because logic or common sense or whatever clearly says so.
    But (i think i said this before) what is "common sense" or "logic" anyway? Seriously... You know, i think it simply is somehow the LIMIT of our brains. Because you cant explain the reason of such things while you just naturally come to such conclusions...

    Dunno... LOL

    I was just quoting Vader lol....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p4T7_XI7WM

    The problem with physics now is that they're studying things so ridiculously complex that us non-geniuses have to take it on faith that they know what they're doing. Newtonian physics could be understood for the most part by a high school student. Even relativity isn't that hard to grasp. But quantum mechanics and string theory are just....ridiculous!

    Have you heard of the double slit experiment? It's nuts.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc

    The ending is a bit disingenuous. Observation fundamentally changes the experiment, because you have to "hit" the electrons with something else to observe them, much the way that we only see things because they are being struck with photons which are gathered by our eyes.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Time loops are the key to immortality?
    Quote from "Kenzai" »
    There simply IS-NOT-A-WAY for us humans to damn find out "the truth" about "everything".
    Or at least during my lifetime... i guess.
    Its probably that our brains are just so limited.

    Uhh... I dont know. Thinking about such things is fascinating but never leads anyway and chances are, you'll loose your mind. LOL

    I find your lack of faith disturbing...Though actually, you're right. Godel proved that we can't prove all true statements, even when dealing with mathematics. Craziness.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems
    That is kind of interesting. Why do we think we're even capable of understanding life, the universe, and everything? We don't even have women figured out yet.


    I don't even find the idea of immortality attractive. I think our relatively short-lived lives are what give us ambition. Can you imagine how different society and culture would be if we lived to 1000 instead of 75ish? Think of all the implications.
    http://digg.com/d1nIPh
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.