surely they must have something in mind to enable them to design everything , and i would really like to get a new pc soon , but dont want to spend all my money on something that wont run the game on highest settings smoothly .. if i know what i need then i can save up more to buy something better ..
blizzard want to take their time to get the game just right ,and thats fine with me .. but id like to have a goal for saving up for a pc that is just right to play their perfect game on
also i second a vote for the question about will there be voice abiity in game over battle.net , that would rock not having to use a third party software for voice
0
0
i have a stupid question .. on the picture in the 1st post of this thread , who is that guy ??
0
surely they must have something in mind to enable them to design everything , and i would really like to get a new pc soon , but dont want to spend all my money on something that wont run the game on highest settings smoothly .. if i know what i need then i can save up more to buy something better ..
blizzard want to take their time to get the game just right ,and thats fine with me .. but id like to have a goal for saving up for a pc that is just right to play their perfect game on
also i second a vote for the question about will there be voice abiity in game over battle.net , that would rock not having to use a third party software for voice
0
0
feel free to answer any of the questions here that blizzard has already been talking about .. not all of us have enough hours a day to spend reading every ounce of info released ..and it may even help out the mod of this thread incase he missed reading the blizzard release of that info .. which in turn will save him from looking silly asking that question on the day
it will also stop a second person asking the same question hopefully (if they read everything in this thread).
An old chinese proverb says:
''He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not remains a fool forever.''
0
top notch questions .. i really cant see why they cant wear the exact same things as normal chars .. like rings, amulets carry charms etc and have an inventory the same size .. fair enough if you have to pay them gold per day for carrying it etc but they should implement this
0
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE MAKE THEM SAY YES ....LOL
Excellent idea to implement .. the num pad voice was always hard to tell who the hell it was needed the help anyway..lol
My Questions are:
1) is cain ever gonna teach someone the horadrim ways .. as he's the last of his kind it would be a shame to lose all that knowledge ..lol
2) Will Diablo III be the last ever diablo ???
0
pmsl .. reminds me of a scene in the film lock, stock and two smoking barrels .. lol except that was rubber, and i presume a great deal smaller than you might expect on a monster boss such as diablo or the siege breaker...lol
i don't mind chopping bits off , but im not picking it up without any gloves on:thumbsup: ....lmao
0
i for one hate PvP :), and everytime i log onto battle net theres an average of 50,000 other people playing .. i'm sure they don't all play the game for only PvP :-s ......PvM ftw :thumbsup: ..lol
0
The intelligent design movement all happened after einstein died .. i can't disagree with that .. but ...the origins of intelligent design seem to stem all the way back to plato , here's some references;
http://evolutionlist.blogspot.com/2006/02/platonic-roots-of-intelligent-design.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleological_argument
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_Design#Origins_of_the_concept
and ive cut out parts of the conversation for quick reference from this link that i posted before
http://www.pbs.org/thinktank/show_1244.html
MICHAEL: What I’m saying is I agree with Steve completely that intelligent design theory which goes back I think the last eighties, 1980s, and certainly...
STEVE: Actually, earlier than that.
MICHAEL: Well, certainly -– well I think it goes back to Plato of course, cause I don’t think you’re saying anything new, but certainly as we know it, I think certainly was started by Philip Johnson in a big way with his book Darwin on Trial in 1991. And certainly that was the thing which got the movement going.
STEVE: It’s a science. Looking at information in the field of seismology. And I went to a conference on the origin of life. I was in my mid-twenties and it was in the early eighties and there were three scientists there that were arguing the digital information that’s encoded in DNA is evidence of a prior intelligence. And they were suggesting that the classical argument from design that goes all the way back to Plato and Aristotle could be resuscitated on the basis of modern scientific discoveries.
WATTENBERG: Let me see if I can get this right what I think. All people who believe in intelligent design may or may not be creationists. But all people who believe in intelligent design are not creationists. (Freud) believed in an intelligent design, Einstein believed in an intelligent design, and Charles Darwin believed in intelligent design. He had an idea as to how the world works. And uhh…
so if this is the case it would seem that intelligent design had been around for 2300 years
0
1st from what i can gather he was'nt atheist , he was agnostic (according to wiki) (which is the best view in my opinion as it does not restrict you to such a narrow view) or Pantheistic (according to other references) .. my ref =
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein
http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2008/05/einstein_god_is_human_weakness_1.html
and 2nd .. it seems to me that einstein did actually support intelligent design .. here's some references
http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/forum/webbbs_config.pl/noframes/read/3155
http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2008/01/Einstein-and-Intelligent-Design.aspx
http://www.pbs.org/thinktank/transcript1244.html
http://familyactionorganization.wordpress.com/2007/08/17/investigating-origins-einstein-and-intelligent-design/
anyway .. don't shoot the messenger , i'm just trying to help set some facts straight so you can atleast eliminate one thing from the argument .. which has come a very long way from the original question..lol
0
i'm a pretty open minded sort of person , and i'm equallly interested in religious views and scientific facts , and how they interact with each other proving and disproving each other etc , both of which can provide a person with a well rounded sense of morals and intelligence etc .. or not as in some cases..lol , i am not religious atall , unless you believe jedi is a serious religion
as for believing in angels , well when the day to day reality of life gets boring or just plain hard going then its always good to have a place to escape to , that place is a whole other world full of fantasy such as angels , demons , goblins , aliens , dragons and every other mythical creature you can think of , and for me atleast , maybe others .. to fully indulge yourself into this fantasy world you need to forget reality somewhat which i guess in a way means you need to believe in everything your fantasy entails to a certain degree .
so i'm gonna vote maybe on this one , as i maybe not believe in the extreme ways some of you do and do not but in my own way i do ..lol
0
Anyway i also wanted to point out to Drier that its not a necklace chain around deckards neck .. its a chain that holds his cloak together around his shoulders , you will find this common in much fantasy media
0
hope you dont mind but ive stolen your desktop picture ..lol
if you made this yourself then wow your furgin amazing .. but if not then id like to see what else this artist has done before .. do you know his/her name??
0