dude I was burnt out 2 seasons ago. Guess what ? I still play it for the cosmetics. I have most of my Softcore classes geared. I really just want a full ancient zbarb. I might go back to Hardcore because seasons made a full rotation. So i'll either make a HC wiz or HC sader. But because I have all the stash tabs now, I can go super casual. I arguable don't even have to play seasons anymore.Quote from Demonmonger»
None of these ruined the game, the game itself is just fine.
Everyone who votes for one of these issues has something else in common, THEY HAVE PLAYED THE GAME FAR TOO MUCH AND ARE BURNT OUT.
That is the common factor in 99% of people who complain that D3 is dead, yada yada
There is actually alot of content and things to do in the end game. Like it goes over peoples heads sometimes. Especially the ones that took a 1 year break prior to patch 2.4.0.
People beg for a D2 HD remake for what, nostalgia. If anything, They should just link D2 with battlenet. Blizzard should just bring all the legacy games to the Battlenet hot bar (Warcraft 1,2,3 ; D1&2 ; SC1).
I don't know, the people that are complaining, take a break. Play PoE or Grim Dawn. Go back to D2 since you are begging to play it so badly.
3
Like the story they told us at Blizzcon. To summarize the story, from 2005-2009, they had massive struggles maintaning servers for WoW, the companies cash cow, and they used every ounce of manpower they had to deliver. Thus, SC2 and D3 were delays 5+ years to make sure WoW became the hit that it is today.
Because of this, I firmly believe future Blizzard projects are going to be beyond kickass experiences.
Overwatch is the first game to come out since the company began to collect this insane amount of revenue from WoW (some of you are going to say hearthstone, but hearthstone was originally going to be an in game minigame for WoW that they expanded upon, so the game really is just an extension of WoW.)
Bottom line, the facts are that they finally have a dedicated staff again for each game, and I expect to see some pretty amazing things from Blizzard moving forward. If you thought this company was able to make kickass games before, just wait until you see what they can do with nearly 4000% more yearly revenue!!!!!
3
You would not hire a "Game Designer" for a simple Necromancer pack.
You hire game designers to streamline an entire project. This is absolutely either an expansion, Diablo 4, or a MASSIVE DLC pack that offers a new act, new story, new game systems, etc.....
I think people need to come to realize that the Diablo 3 engine has a lot of room for growth, so we very well could see Diablo 3 evolve into simply being called "Diablo" with constant DLC packs revamping it every 6 months or so! I personally would be all for that. It gives you something to look forward too. You are not just playing dead in the wind wondering if they will ever do anything new. Instead, you would know that two times a year you are going to get some form of content that is going to add more play-ability to the game.
We would all welcome that! And at the least, if it is not the D3 engine, I really believe the next game in the series is going to simply be called "Diablo" and will follow the model I shared in the paragraph above.
2
Okay, thanks, I was not seeing that, but now that I went into b.net I see that as an option.
SWEETNESS!!!!
Not going to hard or anything but should be fun for a change of pace!
1
If you take a look at paragon mathematically, most will agree that once you get around 1,000 paragon, due to diminishing returns, the next 1,000 paragon will be a 3-5 GR level difference.
Thus paragon really is not this "end all be all" in terms of competition.
Instead, many people like myself are upset with the current system because it is dry, lazy, and lacks any sort of creative flow. I think most people on my chain of thought want every system in the game to be unique and add to diversity. Paragon really does not do this. Fixes for it are numerous, and I am not sure which direction would be the best, but it really would be nice to see a system that is focused on skills instead of just +5 main stat.
1
1
You WANT TO HEAR that this game is dead, so you are doing whatever you can to make sure that happens.
At some point you need to just move on man.
1
That is not possible anymore, and that is a good thing. This will not affect the lowbies as you said, but it will not hurt the top end either.
Finally, you need to use skill to CREATE Density! Dev Crew, please continue to make more changes that reflect the skill of players, thanks and have a good day!!!!
1
I think that is a pretty bold and otherwise uneducated assumption.
You hinted at it, but it is more about the skill it takes to get that build 90+ than anything else in the mind of the Devs. Spirit Barrage in season would probably see a GR105 clear from that one dedicated person, but to me, you need to take the top 10+ clears with that build and average them out. Then, your hammerdin +7 looks more like +25, and the Spirit barrage looks more like +16 (assuming the average would be around 90).
In my honest opinion, both should receive at most a small 5-10% nerf. Beyond that, I THINK WE ALL WELCOME THE FACT WE HAVE OTHER OPTIONS NOW!!!!! THAT IS A GOOD THING!!!!! SO STOP ASKING FOR NERFS.
1
Why can't people just accept that you can trade with your friends. It just needs to be in games played together!
Others have said it, but if you open up trading, then China bots will just flood the game selling everything through spam in trade chat. NO THANK YOU!
3
Am I the only one that actually wishes area damage would be removed?