I think it'd be funny if they included a "Behind-the-Scenes" DVD where, for about two minutes, they were just sitting around a table, there's some bullshit written up on a whiteboard, and they're silent until one of them just says, "guys, we really need to get this done." Then it goes into the actual development of the game and what they did, stuff like that. They could make it humorous, that's what I'd like the most, just some form of reflective comedy to make us feel better.
I think it'd be a good homage to the "Great Wait."
And I want a poster flag, a nice case, an artwork book, a soundtrack, and a good-sized strategy guide of some sort. It'd be cool, as an in-game thing, if they included something regarding unicorns or vibrant colors.
- Azriel
- Registered User
-
Member for 14 years, 5 months, and 7 days
Last active Mon, Mar, 23 2015 03:28:59
- 29 Followers
- 1,889 Total Posts
- 129 Thanks
-
May 18, 2011Azriel posted a message on The Follower BluesThe questions is why would you want them in PvP to begin with? They are essentially worthless when compared to actual teammates because, not only will they just get picked off, but the classes have skills that can supersede any attack performed by a follower. They're pretty much target practice in the arena. You can't even control them, so I don't even see how, if you die, the tide of battle will somehow be turned over when your follower is left alone.Posted in: News
PvP will never have followers. Sorry. It's just not practical. -
May 18, 2011Azriel posted a message on The Follower BluesI play single player; for a great majority of the time I played D2, I played campaign in all difficulties, very rarely going online. I'll reiterate what I said earlier: I don't like playing with other people that much. I've never had a pleasant multiplayer experience with most games and prefer to play by myself.Posted in: News
Hopefully D3 has good enough multiplayer to allow me some comfort, but just because you don't necessarily play it doesn't mean that that is fact that nobody plays it.
Honestly, the real reason why I'm excited for this game is to see what happens with the story. Keeping in mind that all the systems revealed thus far have been pretty spectacular (I'm not interested in mercs, but the system is good), that is only more reason to enjoy my single player experience. Sure, I'll play D3 multiplayer with my friends and stuff, but it's not even because it's multiplayer and "killing enemies with your friends is fun." I've never seen Diablo multiplayer as fun in many ways (to me at least) because I prefer to go at my own pace (which is often pretty fast) and I get sort of frustrated while waiting for people to recuperate just so I can continue and they don't moan and complain.
Now, I really don't see how mercs are going to work well in the endgame. I really don't see how they're going to add anything substantial to the lore either. Mercs have no real appeal to me and I don't suspect to enjoy them. -
May 15, 2011Azriel posted a message on The Follower BluesSum of Blizzard's responses:Posted in: News
You can have a follower, no problem, but don't expect them to follow you past normal. Don't expect them to be somewhat better if you acquire one in later difficulties either.
So, I dunno. I've never been the one to use a merc because I am definitely the kind of guy who just hates looking out for other people (in games), so I could care less how great this system turns out to be and how amazingly cool it is; I'll never use them. If they die, then it's wasted money that Blizzard wants us to spend the way we want to spend it. I'd rather pay for upgrading my weapons in Nightmare and Hell rather than getting stuff for my follower just so they don't die on me.
Am I saying it's a worthless system? No. I'm saying that I'll never use it because I don't see myself liking it. I prefer to slice my own bread. -
May 9, 2011Azriel posted a message on May 9th Conference CallI should've specified.Posted in: News
What I meant to say was, "by that time, beta has already been announced." If Blizzcon is in October and the window they're aiming to release external testing is between July and September, than you can't announce something that is already in place. That's like announcing Christmas in January. Sure, they may reiterate the fact that Beta is in sequence, but they're not going to announce it in October. -
May 9, 2011Azriel posted a message on May 9th Conference CallPosted in: News
Beta has already been announced.
And what is your reasoning behind Mid-2012? -
May 9, 2011Azriel posted a message on May 9th Conference CallAnd here comes Magi, right on cue.Posted in: News
I dunno, the voice in the back of my head says 2012, but I really, really want to believe that Blizzard wants to release it this year. All signs point to "likely," but I can't take that for what it is because, shit, it's Blizzard. -
May 9, 2011Azriel posted a message on May 9th Conference CallPosted in: NewsQuote from Gheed2010
Whether or not it was a lucky guess, time to admit the "fired tester" was probably right.
I wouldn't take anything found on 4chan as fact. That's deadly. -
May 9, 2011Azriel posted a message on May 9th Conference CallYou should also take into account that internal testing is going great, so they'll probably address certain issues that they find within their own testing and then release a polished beta in Q3.Posted in: News
I'm counting on the fact that Beta won't be 6 months. -
Apr 28, 2011Azriel posted a message on Diablo III in the New York TimesPosted in: News
But that's where the magic happens. -
Apr 28, 2011Azriel posted a message on Diablo III in the New York TimesPosted in: NewsQuote from Jackzor
Well you don't want the game to be broken. If you have a buggy start it can kill a game's community from the beginning, and Blizzard isn't one to release a game thats not polished. That being said, considering they gave themselves a 6 month window I think they'll have plenty of time to fix any bugs.
Yeah, what he said.
And I support the auction house idea. I just hope they go about it the right way. I'd like it if it was a separate window within the Multiplayer window and there'd be subcategories where people are putting up items and stuff they just want to sell. It would be like a forum, in a way, but there would be certain parameters that must be filled before one can post.
Also, you would have to set a minimum value/ultimately desired item to come out of the trade. For instance:
If person A wants a high class emerald, and let's imagine that it costs 5000 gold and he sees someone posting a high class emerald in the "house," he can put up 5000 gold initially. Someone else can come in and place their own bid and, based on how much person A wants a high class emerald, he'll have to surpass that amount (like any auction house).
Now, if person B wants a unique sword in exchange for 10 high class gems and it happens to be an item that person A also wants, he'll have to put up 10 high class gems to meet the requirement.
I just want it to be practical and not fluffed up. -
Apr 28, 2011Azriel posted a message on Diablo III in the New York TimesPosted in: NewsQuote from debo
Hopefully we will have an idea of this period before June in order to buy this game this year after the supposed beta phase of 6 month.
I really don't know how to take the prospect of 6 months. For all we know, it might not even take that long if the Beta isn't filled with game-hindering bugs. If there are just a handful, I could imagine them trimming down those "6 months" to about 5 or 4. -
Apr 19, 2011Azriel posted a message on Where's Beta?I wonder if, due to a decrease in activity from their other franchises, they'll try to up the hype for D3 some more and start announcing these systems more frequently than we've seen in the past. I don't think it's likely, but it's worth taking into consideration seeing that Cataclysm was released last December.Posted in: News
-
Apr 18, 2011Azriel posted a message on AtomicGamer Interviews Kevin MartensPosted in: NewsQuote from Magistrate
But that's essentially what you did:Quote from AzrielI wouldn't take it with a grain of salt either.What happens 8 months down the road is hard to predict, so they might say that they want to release it this year, but that might not happen.
I tried not to, I tried to approach it with an air of indifference. But technicalities don't matter right meow.
I just hope that, when I'm doing a side quest where I do have to escort somebody, that they don't deliberately try to take on huge monsters with lots of bulk. There's nothing I hate more than somebody being a dumbass, which:
1) Disallows me from completing the quest
2) Causes me to save their ass because they're fucking retarded
3) Ultimately, discourages me from even trying to complete it
If I could make him hide in a corner, like a Command < Stay, then that would be cool. I just don't want them to die while I'm trying to kill 20 guys and he's over there up to his neck with Fallen Berserkers. -
Apr 18, 2011Azriel posted a message on AtomicGamer Interviews Kevin MartensI wouldn't take anything that Blizzard says as completely factual, but I wouldn't take it with a grain of salt either. What happens 8 months down the road is hard to predict, so they might say that they want to release it this year, but that might not happen.Posted in: News
Hopefully, it does. If it does, than 2011 will be the best Christmas I've had in years. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9AOTMNoFKY
0
I mean, at least I'm not shooting in the dark with that idea. Other people have confidence in my abilities (unless they were just trying to be nice and I suck ass at writing).
0
Yeah, the thing is that I'm trying to get a job so I can actually go to community college and pay for stuff on my car like insurance and gas. I'm only 18 and, even though I don't have many responsibilities, I need to get my shit together if I'm going to be able to shift into the college life comfortably. Even after I get my Associate's, I'm going to transfer to a 4-year Uni to get my Master's in Business and Engineering.
It just makes me feel like the dude kind of molested my trust a little bit. Yes, that is the euphemism I would like to use.
The reason why I wanted to go to college is because I do want to start my own business. I can try the web design thing, but I'm not that talented of an artist. I've recently started writing reviews of albums and I'm trying to get more notoriety. I think, in the future, I'd want to sit down and actually write a book and see where that takes me.
0
I'm sketched out about leaving this place too because I don't know if I'll have to list it on future applications as previous work experience.
0
It just felt like a bad deal. I'm not comfortable with it at all.
0
Paul Ryan is, quite arguably, the worst VP pick anyone could've imagined. Have fun losing Florida, Mitt.
0
So I went on Craigslist looking for a job and I found this thing that looked kind of promising; warehouse position, little to no experience required, eleven bucks an hour, full time. So me, knowing that I shouldn't hold myself back from something I may fit well in, shot the dude an email detailing why I'd be a good fit along with my resume.
The dude emails me back and says that, while I wasn't a good enough fit for that particular position due to my lack of job experience (go figure), there was another "position" available at a recycling facility where I'd be sorting recycable materials in hot, dusty conditions. We arranged to have a "sit-down" to talk about it.
Turns out the dude worked for a staffing agency. I figured this out before I sat down with him, but I didn't know the conditions on which we would talk about this "position" he had "lined up" for me. I get to the place where he works and has me fill out a huge application. Up until that point, I didn't realize that I was applying for a "right to call in for work." He had me under the guise that I was applying for the position we talked about. After I finish filling out the app, we sit down and he makes absolutely no mention of the position we talked about. He just says that they're an agency that puts people to work when they call in and he said that, if I did want work on "one of my days off" (which was even more insulting cause he knows I don't have a job), I'd have to call in at five in the morning and hope that there is something I can do.
You can see why this is something I don't want to do. I know that solid positions are kind of hard to come by nowadays (especially since vastly overqualified people are taking the jobs that teens nowadays should have gotten), but I needed something that I could rely on and would get me solid hours.
If anyone wants to throw some advice my way, it'd be much appreciated. My parents don't think it's a good idea to continue association with this place, but I just wanted some other opinions as well. I feel very cheated and, frankly, I want no part in this. If anyone sees any sort of value in this, then I'd be happy to hear your opinion.
0
I suppose you've never heard of a group called The Dangerous Summer?
0
Naturally, I adore these movies. The extended editions are worth watching. I'm not going to give a numerical rating, just some advice; if you loved the movies before, it would be worth picking up the extended editions if you haven't already seen them. If you don't like them, I wouldn't want you to waste your time.
Listening to the cast commentary is loads of fun though. Billy Boyd's commentary is hilarious and Andy Serkis chimes in with *perfect* Gollum / Smeagol voices from time to time. It's really great stuff.
0
I don't think so, man. It seems that the shock from the impact might have just ruined the video card (and maybe some other things in your laptop). The only time I have seen anomalies like that is on my PS3 when it just overheated. There are components that shouldn't be tampered with.
You might have to go without gaming for a while until you can get a new laptop.
0
Well, I don't think it's inappropriate. I just want people to do more than that. It's definitely a method that people can stand by easily. I'll never eat there. Ever. Even if I did happen to go to Georgia or Alabama, I'd go to Popeye's for a chicken fix. In the meanwhile, I'll be trying to help dismantle the machine through greater strides. I actively supported Washington's same sex marriage referendum and, since a bunch of anti-LGBT pricks want to try to shoot down through a public vote, I'll be voting for same sex marriage this November and voting for Jay Inslee, a pro-LGBT Democrat running for governor.
I'm proud to live in Washington. At least the bigots are hard to find.
Edit: I do understand that it is often hard for people to do more. Since I'm 18 and I now have Democratic privileges extended to me, I'll be using the power of my vote to try and make a difference. That's another one of my contributions.
Edit 2: I'm seriously considering writing psychological thriller / horror novels. Don't know where to start though..
0
I wholeheartedly believe that there is far more you can do to support LGBT than just participating in the boycott. I'm the sort of guy who believes there can always be more done. When I heard about the boycott, I felt that it couldn't possibly be enough and I was against it not because I favored Chick-Fil-A (because I most definitely don't), but because I felt that that's only what people would do. I was arguing that people should do more. Avoid homophobic politicians, write your congressmen to vote against homophobic bills, and most definitely stray away from companies that hurt the community with the money they get. There is definitely an anti-LGBT machine out there and a big part of it is in the Bible Belt.
I've always loved the idea of passing an amendment that allows for gay marriage and I think that more people should take more active strides towards making that happen. I understand that boycotting Chick-Fil-A can be effective based on principle alone; I just wanted people to do more. I just didn't want people to think that that's all they could do because there's far more that you can and should do.
0
When we start chastising people merely for their opinion, we are stooping to an unforgivable level; the best thing would be to put the opinion behind us because, honestly, it's just the opinion of one man. I am not a homosexual and I obviously don't know how it feels to be told that one of the things you want most is to directly defy a god you may or may not pray to; I imagine it's the worst kind of slap in the face. Though, the man wasn't militant about his opinion and, for that, I feel obligated to step back. I feel like the media set him up for failure simply for thinking something and they took that, ran with it, and manufactured a controversy. The media likes to watch people fall and what better spectacle than to watch a CEO of a highly successful company be vilified simply for his opinion.
"How could he say that? What a terrible person."
"You know I'm never eating there again."
Not buying a chicken sandwich hardly solves anything. You can't expect to make a difference due to inaction. That strategy only works if you were ignorant to his opinions in the first place because then he would lose sales. The people who go to Chick-Fil-A on a regular basis will probably still go and, if you haven't gone before, he really isn't losing much. The boycott is an almost asinine idea because it hardly solves anything. I'm sure he knew that he would catch some flack for his opinion and the boycott will not change his mind. The boycott won't make him stop donating to the organizations which seek to hurt the LGBT community. The boycott hardly solves anything. I feel kind of sad that Americans feel that simply not buying a product will solve anything; that worked back in, you know, the 18th century when trade between two countries was a very delicate thing, but not spending $10 on a meal and expecting that to make a difference is completely foolish and shortsighted. If anything, you should donate $10 to pro-LGBT organizations to tip the balance of influence in your favor. Chicken sandwiches don't have any influence.
In my opinion, I'd just leave the guy alone and let this pass. I've no doubt that people will forget about this in about a month.
I doubt I'll ever eat at Chick-Fil-A anyway. There aren't any in the Pacific Northwest. I find that a little peculiar because Seattle and Portland are very liberal places and there are Chick-Fil-A restaurants by the tens of dozens dotting the Bible Belt (especially Georgia, holy shit). If that is the wish of the CEO, then that's fine with me. I'm not going to fund those hurtful organizations with my purchase, but I'm not going to crucify this guy simply for his opinion.
So walk with your chin up. The LGBT community has come a far way. The best thing to do would to help those who help you because doing nothing (like refusing to buy a chicken sandwich) doesn't help anybody.
/ my two cents
0
Bitch, your kid is human like the rest of us. They can take a few scratches. Don't get all butthurt cause your kid is stupid. Your kid will learn that their fingers can't fit in certain things. That's a fundamental part of a kid growing up, realizing that they can't do everything and that some things will hurt, but they'll get over it like you got over all those scrapes you got on your knee.
Dumb cunt. Ruin the fun for the rest of the kids because of your kid's perfectly normal mistake. Treat your kid like a human being, pop the bubble, and let it live like I did. I got big scrapes when I was a kid. I ate and drank things I probably shouldn't have. I'm still alive. What does that say?
It says you're an overbearing, prudish cunt. I understand that you want to protect your kid. Protect them from kidnappers, earthquakes, and hurricanes. Don't protect them from life. Life is meant to be experienced and when you meticulously choose what your kid experiences, you have to draw a line that is very hard to draw. That's called being a terrible parent. Raising a kid should be natural. Your being irrational doesn't make you a better parent.
Sorry, I just have these very strong ideas about raising kids.
0
Climate change has a lot more to do with temperatures; our atmosphere and wind currents are affected by the fluctuations in temperature and, in recent years, there have been more violent storms and what the video calls "extreme weather events." Then you have to take into account how crops and forests are affected everywhere because of unnaturally arid climates. Recently, in Washington state, I have seen three thunderstorms this summer alone. We rarely get thunderstorms. Why would we get them now? If you can provide me a logical reason (because I'm sure you are exceedingly knowledgeable on the subject of climatology) why we are seeing so many thunderstorms in Washington, I will cede my concern for our climates in the future.
Climate change is much bigger than "global warming;" it will affect everyone around the world. It has the potential to cripple food supplies. It has the potential to put human health at risk. It has the potential to destroy towns.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_71816&feature=iv&src_vid=b0NrS2L6KcE&v=OmW_EQzU_qI
And climate change costs money. It is economically irresponsible to ignore this. Once things get bad enough, we're going to have to collectively shell out billions of dollars just to protect our own property.
You can take that as you will.