- PhrozenDragon
- Registered User
-
Member for 17 years, 5 months, and 29 days
Last active Sat, Jan, 18 2014 22:23:24
- 51 Followers
- 12,879 Total Posts
- 215 Thanks
-
Nov 1, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on The Final Diablo 3 is Coming argumentQuite possible. How long ago was it though?Posted in: News
-
Nov 1, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!Another job that indicates unannounced projects, but no confirmation. If it had said however:Posted in: News
Required talents:Excessive knowledge of Diablo and of animating evil demons and angels with tentacles
then I would take it as a confirmation. -
Nov 1, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on d3 on the way?That's what I call giving inspiration to your workers.Posted in: News
-
Oct 29, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!Nope, and I think you know whyPosted in: News
-
Oct 29, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!Then perhaps the best solution for us all is a "violence" option. Turn it on, and they bleed more/die worse.Posted in: News
-
Oct 29, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!Posted in: NewsQuote from "AcidReign" »WoW makes TONS of money, and they can afford making it Mature.
"Hey guys, you want to make 1 billion or 2 billions?"
There is no such thing. If Blizzard can make more money and at the same time avoid the possibility of getting burned in media for too much violence, then they will. And that is the T rating.
Am I the only one on this board who doesn't think excessive blood is good? -
Oct 29, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on d3 on the way?I agree with Cyks. Plus, if they continuously announced everything, and then changed their minds, fans would be really upset. And that is something they don't want.Posted in: News
-
Oct 29, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!Well eventually they do, the problem is to make them mature faster, or to keep them from talking to youPosted in: News
-
Oct 28, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!Posted in: NewsQuote from name="Elfen Lied" »
M = Means less little kids.
T = Too many little kids
That's also true. No matter the rating, there's no stopping them. And I don't really have a problem with it, so long as they refrain from acting immaturely. Which is perhaps too much to ask from most of them. -
Oct 28, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!Yes, those ratings are often too high. I mean, what preents a 12 year old from watching a graphic movie at home? Nothing, except for the parents good sense, which seems to be awfully shortcoming these days.Posted in: News
T for Badlur's Gate? Alchohol, yeah right. You press a button and your character gets some negative effects. How inapropriate.
I also agree with the age. Not all kids are like that, but far too many, and they often lack common sense, courtesy, intelligence and general social skills, and for some reason have the idea that if you don't swear and attack all other players in every sentence, there is no point to playing. -
Oct 22, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on "Official" Diablo 3 PetitionWell, I can think of a couple of things, though I don't know if it will be appreciated by Blizzard.Posted in: News
One is to run in on Battle.net and post on those forums
Second is to run in on WoW forums
Chances are I think though that they will get locked by Blizzard.
Or any other Diablo fansite in general. -
Oct 22, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Diablo 3 Fake TrailersYep, that was pretty crappy. First is just WoW, second is really just a bunch of text, and the third, well, I don't really know what the third is, but it's not good.Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
As I see it, the key problem with a follower system is that you either make them an integral part of the game, and more or less force players to use them, or you make them optional, in which case players must be able to play the game without them, thus rendering them more or less useless. I suspect the former is the case here (D2 was more towards the useless department except at high level play).
No doubt will be able to play through the game without a follower, but it will most likely be easier and more efficient to have one of these with you, making it much not a choice when you think about it. If the alternative to walking a mile is pushing a rock in front of you for a mile with no added benefit, it's not much of a choice.
Keep in mind that we really know nothing about the mechanics of them at this point however, so it would seem wise to wait with a final verdict, at least for now.
3
0
0
Also I dearly hope beta won't be six months from then on. Six months from now however I could live with, as that would give us a 2011 release. Right hammy?
0
As for if there's a threshold when killing the host means not killing the Prime Evil, I don't think such a distinction ever existed. From what is hinted in the Sin War, if you happen to possess someone and that body dies while you're in it, you suffer the same effects. It's never actually proved though.
In any case, it's probably of no real relavance in this case, as both the Wanderer and Diablo had the soulstone intact. As in, even if there is a theoretical distinction between killing a Prime Evil inside a human or not, all three of them were in the possession of their soulstones at this time. So any discussion about whether they can return or not must inevitably focus on the nature of the Three themselves, specifically how death works for them, if it does at all.
0
0
Otherwise no welcome for you!
0
0
0
OH, and you other dude, welcome. Don't feel offended, but there's no competing against the hammy avatar
0
The flesh is willing but the mind is weak I would say. But it's alright, you can contribute too if you want to. Believe in yourself
0
0
0
Marius and his presence is super weird. We've had threads here about it but there are so many things that don't make any sense about his existence.
0