you made me lol that hard i prolly waked the neighbors
and i sure agree with you that guns dont really fit in the Diablo universe. Anyway why revive this old, crappy thread and not make a new topic about this matter?
Diablo 2 took place in another universe. You cant use real dates to try prove its possible to implement guns/bombs in Diablo 3. They wouldnt fit the Diablo universe in general.
discussing "possible" D3 info, yeah, but when theres no proof to it they should be discarded just as fast. See this thread? 82 pages of nothing. No proof, just plain talk. Thats just not good enough.
well, there youre wrong, about it not being diablo 3
and i was wondering when we'll disagree again
Still my point is that Blizzard usually carries the name of each series with the exact same of game. See, Warcraft 1, 2 and 3 were RTS. The MMO they made in this universe isnt Warcraft 4. Its World of Warcraft
Getting my point now?
it would very mcuh fit into a plot for the diablo universe
to that we agree very much, and i think a possible Diablo MMO would get more mature people in it and eventually be more fun for me (talking about myself mainly) since i'm a big fan of that particular franchise. But it still wouldnt be called Diablo 3
you're not right about that. At least for the ones that do bother reading the end-game quest texts you see there's tons of story in there. In fact these quests expand the existing lore immensely. (C'thun and the war of the Qiraji, anyone? Thunderaan and the betrayal of Ragnaros? and much much more - excluding the War of the Plaguelands with the Scourge invasion)
Well really I wouldnt make any plans until you play...we dont know how gameplay is going to be until it comes out...if It's MMO then guilds are easier to maintain because you can all be at one place at one time...however if it's an 8 man game like D2 then don't count on being in a guild because its truly pointless....
we agree in something! we got to celebrate it!
well I think d3 being an MMO would be alright, because its heaven,hell, and earth...diablo
i'd say it more like "I wouldnt mind a MMO in the Diablo universe, because its heaven,hell, and earth...diablo"
Diablo 3 as a MMO wouldnt be Diablo 3
the graphics would be better than WoW
i'd say "more mature" thats also a good thing and i'd like ofc.
not a quick worked peice of shit in an attempt to make hsitloads of money
thats not the Blizzard way and i dont expect it to happen. Ever.
is this guy for real? the last time i heared of that class it was in Neverwinter Nights 2. Same with what i've heared about stopping time and the arguement about single and multiplayer. Can it be that he was playing a wrong game?
Otherwise it appears he takes ideas from other games. Blizzard doesnt usually do that (except of the classes that have been there forever like warrior, ranger - amazon -, mage - sorceress - etc).
what i'm saying about the servers is that it will take a big load of servers to replace the majority of the older ones. I really hope that a good part of these opteron will be for the multiplayer for Diablo 3, but i dont hope too much about it. As i said, each realm will have at least 2 servers added (if none gets replaced) and in Europe only we got over 50 realms. Now think of US and Asia and u'll know what i mean (even if Asia will get it a bit later).
that was my point... we got clues to tell us they're making the game. Just wait for the official statements, they know when they let something leak. Nothing Blizzard lets out is by accident.
(the majority of the servers could be used for WoW, tho. They said they'd replace all older ones and each realm will have at least 1 new continent server plus some instance servers).
Ahem. Am i the only one that didnt get any of the "shared" information?
Apparently your way of sharing is saying without proving. That i could to too, anytime of the day. Thanx, i dont need more stuff shared the majority of which doesnt make sense. Even screenshots could be taken from mods under development. I'll wait for the official stuff, cause Blizzard never lets something leak before they intend to.
quite offensive reply but let me say something very shortly too:
DON'T FUCKING SAY "PROOF" UNLESS U REALLY HAVE PROOF!
What he said is no more valid that the stuff i've read on "What do you want to see in D3 thread, for example. No proof of any kind to make us believe it?
Oh, wait he has a friend whos dad works for Blizzard. U dont know me too, i could say my dad is Metzen, then, and i know everything thats going on in Blizzard. Would you believe that? Ofc not.
good thinking there! Even though it would need a really powerfull computer to keep physics from all arrows thrown by each character (ever played full multiple shot? :P). Anyway, it could be something thats gonna be implemented. Theres prolly still alot time till release so everything could happen.
if you want the gameplay to slow to drink a potion (character stops moving, takes off his weapon, takes a potion, drinks it, gets his weapons again) in the middle of the fight then go play the Gothic series (especially 3). Its pretty good and very realistic. theres some hack & slash action too, if u manage to stay alive long enough. Diablo is supposed to have fast action. maybe add a cooldown on each potion would be alright, but not make u stop everything u do to drink a pot. Its nothing like what Blizzard used in their games till now (Warcraft 3, Diablo 1 & 2, WoW).
about Havoc, the only thing i can think of that would make it interesting gameplay-wise and not spoil the usual Diablo gameplay would be traps. Nothing more. Applying physics on everything would make it from strange to annoying. (Woot, the ranged attack classes arrows/javelins fall down after a few meters and dont hit the target they're ment to hit!)
you made me lol that hard i prolly waked the neighbors
and i sure agree with you that guns dont really fit in the Diablo universe. Anyway why revive this old, crappy thread and not make a new topic about this matter?
and i was wondering when we'll disagree again
Still my point is that Blizzard usually carries the name of each series with the exact same of game. See, Warcraft 1, 2 and 3 were RTS. The MMO they made in this universe isnt Warcraft 4. Its World of Warcraft
Getting my point now?
to that we agree very much, and i think a possible Diablo MMO would get more mature people in it and eventually be more fun for me (talking about myself mainly) since i'm a big fan of that particular franchise. But it still wouldnt be called Diablo 3
you're not right about that. At least for the ones that do bother reading the end-game quest texts you see there's tons of story in there. In fact these quests expand the existing lore immensely. (C'thun and the war of the Qiraji, anyone? Thunderaan and the betrayal of Ragnaros? and much much more - excluding the War of the Plaguelands with the Scourge invasion)
we agree in something! we got to celebrate it!
i'd say it more like "I wouldnt mind a MMO in the Diablo universe, because its heaven,hell, and earth...diablo"
Diablo 3 as a MMO wouldnt be Diablo 3
i'd say "more mature" thats also a good thing and i'd like ofc.
thats not the Blizzard way and i dont expect it to happen. Ever.
is this guy for real? the last time i heared of that class it was in Neverwinter Nights 2. Same with what i've heared about stopping time and the arguement about single and multiplayer. Can it be that he was playing a wrong game?
Otherwise it appears he takes ideas from other games. Blizzard doesnt usually do that (except of the classes that have been there forever like warrior, ranger - amazon -, mage - sorceress - etc).
(the majority of the servers could be used for WoW, tho. They said they'd replace all older ones and each realm will have at least 1 new continent server plus some instance servers).
Apparently your way of sharing is saying without proving. That i could to too, anytime of the day. Thanx, i dont need more stuff shared the majority of which doesnt make sense. Even screenshots could be taken from mods under development. I'll wait for the official stuff, cause Blizzard never lets something leak before they intend to.
PS. Stop playing it the emo way, its not working.
DON'T FUCKING SAY "PROOF" UNLESS U REALLY HAVE PROOF!
What he said is no more valid that the stuff i've read on "What do you want to see in D3 thread, for example. No proof of any kind to make us believe it?
Oh, wait he has a friend whos dad works for Blizzard. U dont know me too, i could say my dad is Metzen, then, and i know everything thats going on in Blizzard. Would you believe that? Ofc not.
good thinking there! Even though it would need a really powerfull computer to keep physics from all arrows thrown by each character (ever played full multiple shot? :P). Anyway, it could be something thats gonna be implemented. Theres prolly still alot time till release so everything could happen.
about Havoc, the only thing i can think of that would make it interesting gameplay-wise and not spoil the usual Diablo gameplay would be traps. Nothing more. Applying physics on everything would make it from strange to annoying. (Woot, the ranged attack classes arrows/javelins fall down after a few meters and dont hit the target they're ment to hit!)