DiabloFans

the exact reasons why they didnt leave corpses is because during big fights, they created the ability (cuz of the PS3) to fight up to 50 enemies at a time, and having the bodies takes away an enemy for each. Then you say, "Well what about the times when there arent maxed enemies?" and I tell you, well it could cause conflict to allow the system to try and decide itself what times to keep bodies around and when to drop them and could potentially cause a freeze or lock up, so it was just easier to make them go byebye.

And what didnt you like about the final boss? The epicness of it was supposed to basically be fighting inside the body of a titan and then fighting in the one top of the building flying in the air when gaia riped it into the sky. I particularly liked it aside from the first part fighting on the beam... back... forth... jump... back... forth.... rinse repeat.

What I want to know is who the final titan battle that was removed was. THATS RIGHT they removed a titan fight from the end... But now there thinking about DLC that could be the Epilogue because they said there was way too much ending content cut that they wanted.

By the way, anyone who thinks Kratos is actually dead, your wrong. FIRST OFF, you see in the final look, a trail of blood to the end of the cliff. The world is FLOODED still so he just fell into the water, which mostlikely would help with all the bleeding if done right, plus the main note, the developers have stated that this WILL NOT be the final GOW game, they just want to wrap up the current trilogy. I for one, WANT TO KNOW WHO AND WHAT HAPPENED TO HIS DAMN BROTHER!!!!!

and a final note for this thought, the barb cant have the kratos attitude the way your thinking it, its been said the memories drove him mad which means he really doesnt have all that clear-thought of what happened in the past.

OMFG that would be so fuckin amazingfullawesomness!

I hate xbox. Yes, there are the normal, like the challenges. Videos to watch. The costumes for replay and such, basically the same as the first 2. The cotumes in this game though fail, because theres only like 6 and there all but two from pre-ordering so its impossible to get all without buying 4 copies of the game.

COSTUMES: (no spoilers so just how to get)
1. Unlock from Pre-Order GOW III at GameStop.

2. Unlock from Pre-Order GOW III at Amazon

3. Unlock from Pre-Order GOW III Ultimate Edition at GameCrazy

4. Unlock from Pre-Order GOW III Ultimate or Ultimate Trilogy from any vendor.

5. Unlock from Purchasing with 10 Slurpee reward points (GOW III cups at 7-11 have codes for 2 points apiece, min 5 slurpees need to be bought to redeem for costume)

6. Unlock from beating the game on any difficulty.

Finished it 3 hours ago, been watching the videos I unlocked.... Ive got to say, FUXKING AMAIZING! but im disappointed with the length of the game. an easy end in 10hours if your even decent, thats less than GOW2, thats a huge mistake. I havent been a fan of the short lengths since I played the frist one... Owell its fukin awesome shortness.

LMAO That was one of the central points of GOW2, you had to collect 20 through a few games. (few games means playing THROUGH a few games).

And now I say unto you dudes who will play today, enjoy it! ITS FUCKING AWESOME but todays my anniversary so now that my babes home from school... im done for the day... untill tomorrow, play the hell out of it for me!

HA! That should increase concentration, you should say, THERES MORE MOTIVATION! I need to get my ass home.... damn.... lol ;p its amazing. Played through even more now, youll enjoy it. I cant wait to finish and screw with my costumes, I went through so many slurpees to get one, and pre-ordering GOW Collection and GOW III to get the bonus one.... omgzzz take it as motivation,

"Bust your records, plow through - all the way, and play god of war ALL DAMN DAY!"

PLAYING IT AS WE SPEAK! Its already wicked, picked it up at midnight... it sucked my first one had a damaged case and I had to go back to gamestop and get it replaced... its crazy amazingfull though!

I said that too, i said diablo wouldnt need a body host anymore that he could be absolute in his own form because of the worldstone. I agree with them though thats where everyone was comparing his fem characteristics. But that image is nothing what he will look like, thats almsot his skeletal layer, theres more that will bulk him up so he looks like more than that, and will lose the skinnyness and so-on

wait i think I like the idea of naked ladies in gravy.... hmmm.... maybe thats what happened to the thousand-pounder? sat in heel licking the gravy off of naked-wrestling fem-demons? ahhh anyway... this topic shouldnt even be used to dsicuss if he could have a female host, i started one that everyone annihalted before, and now everyone thinks its possible, but reguardless we know thats nothing but a skeleton and no-less-than 3 layers short of final, so this could actualy be closed if any others agree with me and archie

I SAID that dont YOU listen? I said it would be an EARLY one thaat wasnt BUILTY UP YET! why dont YOU try and read a little. thats what I said! we never said he wasnt in the game either, again read, we said that they teased and said they hadnt confirmed he was, we dont need no confirmation, we KNOW! it was a joke from them. You whole last post needs to be discredited because you ddint even read. try reading because everything you said, was said by me AND others. read.

I wasnt arguing it was belial, that was a question from somone else. and yea confirmation it waas the diablo head, but no confirmation that the image is anything more than diablos head on a placeholder.

what im saying is that first off the arm in your sig is significantly larger and that the thing that appears a spike is higher up in the sig appearing directly behind the arm almost.

and when and where did bashiok and whoever else confirm thats specifically him? thats what ive assked form the begginning first off. and second i also said that can very easily be a placeholder incomplete model. incasy you didnt notice when they were showing work on the legs, there significantly huge and the body is so small. heres an easier understanding... what theyre showing could be the first layer of many that havent been built up, another, itts like saying whats in the image is a stick figure that hasnt been turned into a character yet. i first asked for the proof of confirmation (show me them confriming it) and that still doesnt prove that is the final work, that could be the stick figure and the mass hasnt been done yet.

and heres another thing from a designers point of view. if that is wholely and completly diablo, theyd have to be next to completly done with story and ideals in aspect of that before doing the significant end pieces, they wait untill the VERY end to see what theyve done through the entire project and and see how far they can bring the whole thing.

Like saying theyve designed him as that, right now. then when there net to done with d3 as a whole, they see everything theyve done and know the 100% complete extent of their abilites with themselves, the tech and project as a whole, and would need to scrap him all together to implement there complete ability.

-------------------------------------------
development wise, theres two things game companies agree on, do the FIRST stage last because you know where you can bring it, (ex gears, god of war and many rpg action explorer type)

obviously they arent going that way because weve seen so much of act 1 already. the other second aspecct is, do the finale last because you know where you can bring it. so why would they cement FIRST what diablo is without knowing the extent theyre going to go on all of the game?
---------------------------------------------
and another add, support for the layer idea, look at how the breast is portrayed there or the "boob" many say. its a diff color! that is usually use din layering the structure. if that IS diablo, that is almost his skeletal structure to the most point with meat, organs, scally skin yet to be added, it wont look anything like that in the end and eont even be anywhere near as skinny and feminine

a comparison between a movie and a game are completly unrelated, thats SUPPOSED to be in a movie, itss called a hook, itsz how you keep attention. they dont need to reveal diablo from the beginning to keep our attention, its obvious were here for the haul. and if you look right, the arm in your dig is massive, its more than it looks, dont make me do a paint on all the reasons that image and your sig dont even look alike apart from the face. it even appears like you cna see a spike off his back in yours.

amnd on the feamle diablo idea period, i brought tha tup ages ago and even related it to the past 2 diablos and said even for exmaple what if leah was a D host, and he had a more fem appearence, everyone shot me down.

they couldve used any body period just to create movement for the head area in the cinimatic, im taking college classes to WORK ON game programming, its very common. same idea as when they used a placeholder for the 4th/5th class whatever it was, it can be a placeholder body and the top part for it. For heavens sake, they even denied there possibly even BEING diablo in it. they said they ahdnt ev en confimed him to be in it (10000000000000000 / 1 he is anyway) after the trailer was released! theres a hundred different liklyhoods that that either isnt complete diablo, is a holder for production, is a scraped idea or so many other things.

if your basing the accuracy of that on a statue that shows only the head awww dang, you must be right.

Because theyll let us see diablo when we hadnt seen at the time

-wizard
-monk
-5th class
-belial
-azmodan

or anything else important, think again, its absolutly senseless. PLUS your overlooking one thing, that WHOLE video was about making the VIDEOS which means that could easily be a completly BS body used just to be able to move the entire thing so neck up could be seen in the end of the video. its easier to move a complete object as a whole than it is to move just those parts and make it look right. it couldve simply been something used to make it easier for the release video.

where are you getting head and boobs? only thing seen that could ever be anything reminicent of diablo is the design of that skinny feminine looking thing (which is more than the head and "boobs") and then the statue. I am willing to say it he will nook nothing rmeinicent of that other than the head and shoulders, which ive said MATCH, thats all

and another thing, weve talked about possible abilities of "the lord of lies" and such were even possibly shapeshifting. we cant say that he cant become similar to diablo for all a player knows (never seeing him, or not seeing him in 20years). For all we know, diablo REALLY IS still traped in hell, maybe the lord of lies imitates him (but not BECOMES, imitates means similar and thusly not feminine) and makes us believe its diablo, and then he dissappears. everyone thinks "Weve got to go INTO hell and END diablo" then the lord of lies wins and is free of the greater evil.

the statue does not look like that design! at all in my own opinion. and looking at it in the video its even got the mouth things on the shoulders, but that means zero. it could be a simple diablo-like demon or anyhting or even a scraped thing. Do you really think theyd show us diablo and we havent seen the majority of any importaant anythings yet?