I agree with vegas :/..
the art direction is not bad, it just doesn't fit diablo at all, if we didn't know that diablo 3 was being made and we looked at that barbarian woman screenshot, we would never think that it's diablo 3, we would think it's from a new WOW game or something, but not diablo.
and blizzard is not changing the graphics because they already made most of the game using WOW ideas and WOW looking graphics, they said it themselves that diablo 3 is very influenced by WOW, and WOW makes money so if they take some things from WOW they are hoping to attrack WOW players too and hope it will be almost as big as WOW...all of us diablo fans will buy diablo 3, even if we like it or not just to see how it is.
Blizzard north really didn't think diablo would make a lot of money, they just made a great game (even with its few flaws it was still great) without thinking about making a lot of money, but this is not blizzard's case anymore, I remember when they listened to their fans and made games because they wanted to make great games, not because they wanted to make money.
there are way to many blizzard fans that think they can't do anything wrong, that they are game making gods or something and trust blizzard completely, I don't really think blizzard has made any good games besides diablo and diablo 2 (exp not included), WOW is total crap and played by losers and little kids. I remember playing diablo 1 and having the crap scared out of me, I was actually afraid to go in a fight the monsters and I'm sure a lot of you got at least chills playing diablo 1 and it wasn't only scary, but it wa salso fun and it took skill and thinking, but diablo 3 has lost the "diablo" heart and doesn't really feel like diablo anymore, diablo 1 had crap graphics, but at least they did what they were meant to do, inmerse you in the game and scare you.
It sucks that the graphics look colorful and too soft and have no texture or defenition at all, like most people say, they look like paintings, if I wanna look at a painting then I go to a museum, but I don't wanna kill a zombie that doesn't look like a zombie or walk through a monster infected section that doesn't look scary, graphics might not play an important part in most games, but they do in diablo, and I too like vegas don't play many games and carefully choose which ones to play because I don't have much time to play games and I rather use it playing a great game than just random other not so good games
blizzard's arguments about the gaem are not substantial either, it's all bull because they just DON'T wanna change the graphics and want to appeal to as many people as possible, thus they are aiming for a non mature rating too :/
- ld006
- Registered User
-
Member for 16 years, 11 months, and 6 days
Last active Tue, Sep, 23 2008 23:23:41
- 0 Followers
- 26 Total Posts
- 1 Thank
-
Aug 25, 2008ld006 posted a message on G4TV's Adam Sessler Attacks Diablo 3's Art HatersPosted in: News
-
May 1, 2008ld006 posted a message on Diablo3.com becomes Diablofans.com! Blizzard acquires diablo3.com.I think this could be either good or bad. 75% chance that they will announce diablo 3 at wwi which is why they finally got diablo3.com, or 25% chance that they don't want any sites about diablo 3 because they are never making it and they want anyone who types anything about diablo to go directly to blizzard and maybe be interested in other blizzard games (like wow) since there's no diablo 3Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
it was WAY too long, it had no plot!!! no plot at all...not even a climax, it was just a whole bunch of scenes/series put together, felt more like "batman the series back to back", and they rushed it after the 1st half of the movie, the characters had no development and didn't connect, they guy playing the batman can't act for crap, the whole deep voice thing was just stupid and annoying, and when the batman fought, he looked like a midget with tiny arms trying to use karate moves.
The movie should've been called "the joker", he did an OK performance and appeared more than the batman himself. the joker didn't impress me much, people are just flipping over him all because he died, Jack did much better. There was too much pointless talking that didn't even add anything to the movie, and why did batman want to stop being a hero? Did he forget why he became the batman in the 1st place? the movie had a few good parts, like the batmobile turning into a motorcycle, the joker doing his "magic trick" and when they showed two-face's face for the 1st time. Movies are supposed to make you want to keep watching and have a plot and at least a climax, not just random action and pasted together scenes, it was like they started a whole different movie every 20 mins...the first 6 mins were def the best in the whole movie, then after that it starts to drag it out
By far not the best movie I've ever seen, not even a "good" movie....it's just too overhyped
0
also to add to the list:
Harvey birdman
Frisky dingo
12 oz. mouse
family guy is only funny sometimes...and i hate the stupid flashbacks or when they drag out something for too long, like when peter falls and hurt his leg or has that stupid fight with the chicken...south park hasn't been that funny lately but it is still funnier than family guy
0
*"the fly" and the "fly 2". Epic movies, very cool, and the fly 2 doesnt suck as most part 2 movies do
*the devil's rejects" not so much scary, but great plot and entertaining, nice gore too. def must watch
*cube" also great, more of a suspense-horror, very unique movie
tale's from the crypt tv series are always good too..but yeah..haven't found any other good horror movies really :/.....I can guarantee you will enjoy the movies I suggested
PS: I always wanted to watch "the thing" too...gonna give that one a try
0
0
if not, then just open up the bootskin program and choose file>import from file and choose the diablo 3 bootskin and it'll change your bootskin
0
0
0
0
Click Here To Download
(only works with windows xp, so don't use it if you have vista, and if you do have vista....then shame on you :/..)
*you need this program to use bootskins: http://www.stardock.com/products/bootskin/
0
1
the art direction is not bad, it just doesn't fit diablo at all, if we didn't know that diablo 3 was being made and we looked at that barbarian woman screenshot, we would never think that it's diablo 3, we would think it's from a new WOW game or something, but not diablo.
and blizzard is not changing the graphics because they already made most of the game using WOW ideas and WOW looking graphics, they said it themselves that diablo 3 is very influenced by WOW, and WOW makes money so if they take some things from WOW they are hoping to attrack WOW players too and hope it will be almost as big as WOW...all of us diablo fans will buy diablo 3, even if we like it or not just to see how it is.
Blizzard north really didn't think diablo would make a lot of money, they just made a great game (even with its few flaws it was still great) without thinking about making a lot of money, but this is not blizzard's case anymore, I remember when they listened to their fans and made games because they wanted to make great games, not because they wanted to make money.
there are way to many blizzard fans that think they can't do anything wrong, that they are game making gods or something and trust blizzard completely, I don't really think blizzard has made any good games besides diablo and diablo 2 (exp not included), WOW is total crap and played by losers and little kids. I remember playing diablo 1 and having the crap scared out of me, I was actually afraid to go in a fight the monsters and I'm sure a lot of you got at least chills playing diablo 1 and it wasn't only scary, but it wa salso fun and it took skill and thinking, but diablo 3 has lost the "diablo" heart and doesn't really feel like diablo anymore, diablo 1 had crap graphics, but at least they did what they were meant to do, inmerse you in the game and scare you.
It sucks that the graphics look colorful and too soft and have no texture or defenition at all, like most people say, they look like paintings, if I wanna look at a painting then I go to a museum, but I don't wanna kill a zombie that doesn't look like a zombie or walk through a monster infected section that doesn't look scary, graphics might not play an important part in most games, but they do in diablo, and I too like vegas don't play many games and carefully choose which ones to play because I don't have much time to play games and I rather use it playing a great game than just random other not so good games
blizzard's arguments about the gaem are not substantial either, it's all bull because they just DON'T wanna change the graphics and want to appeal to as many people as possible, thus they are aiming for a non mature rating too :/
0
I didnt render it though >.<, my rendering skills are limited, i just finished it up
0
1280x800: http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb160/LD006/diablo/tyrael.jpg
[not my renders, i just put it together and finished the edges and wings on tyrael so it doesn't look too cut out]
0
0