- Magistrate
- Registered User
-
Member for 16 years, 10 months, and 4 days
Last active Wed, Oct, 5 2022 13:28:23
- 55 Followers
- 14,646 Total Posts
- 354 Thanks
-
Apr 2, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchYep, we established that several hundred thousand million times, but good you noticedPosted in: News
-
Mar 31, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchPosted in: NewsQuote from "TheOctagon" »Whoa, was that some pessimism creeping into my voice? How dare me. :rolleyes:
I prefer to call it "realism", and you have every right to be so, since former speculations about the release of a third Diablo or even a patch or expansion have often (always, in the case of a DIII) proven entirely false concepts. But this time, eh, well, let's just hope it's decent. -
Mar 30, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchI assumed whoever runs this site legally owns the site. They couldn't just steal it, could they?Posted in: News
-
Mar 30, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchExcept that he is usually the one who announces most of it to us.Posted in: News
And Spaz., flaming someone and then posting "Have fun :)" at the end does not make it a friendly or non-flaming post, please don't do that, he wasn't flaming you, he was just saying that your spelling was messed up. Also, he said nothing about post counts:
Lol. He did fuck his wording up badly didn't he?
I almost said to go make an introduction thread but then checked and realized you've been around longer then me.
Side note: Medieval is kinda worshiped around here so you might get flamed for pointing out errors he says.
I do not see the words "post count" in there anywhere. He was probably basing it on the join date. -
Mar 30, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchHmm...Never noticed that before, last time I checked it was a bunch of foreign letters or something, but that was months ago. Strange that it goes directly to the Arreat Summit... GASP! Maybe Blizzard didn't buy out our site, maybe they're just remodeling the Arreat Summit, since they already own itPosted in: News
-
Mar 29, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchPosted in: NewsQuote from "SteelVelocity" »Or they could not charge a fee at all. If they do, I suppose you could always write your local congressman. That always make a difference.
Lol, yes, because we all know our local government is so efficient. And yes, free would be nice, but I'm very skeptical about it. With a massive increase in graphics and if the game became very popular, they'd need money to maintain their servers. -
Mar 29, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchPosted in: NewsQuote from "SteelVelocity" »W-World of Warcraft!!!??? OH GOD!!! Pay to play sucks!.... Ah well, do you think they will put a charge on Battle.net? I heard those rumors are recirculating since the guys at Blizzard have not decided whether or not to put a monthly/bi-monthly charge on B.net. (and no, I don't have the link, you'll just have to find it yourself.)
Yes, there was something about that somewhere in one of the posts on this site, I remember reading something like they haven't decided yet and they may make pay-to-play for certain regions or something like that. Good luck finding it on here, though, hehe.
And on the payment thing, it would be nice if they'd let you have like a month fre (which I think they do in WoW, your first month or something, or atleast that was availible in the new SC Battle Chest) and then you only had to pay like 100 bucks for life time play, like LOTR online. Even though it looks monstrous upfront, it would save you a ton in the end, and it would be less of a hassle, because you wouldn't have to keep paying over and over again. -
Mar 28, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchI would "lol" that, but I hear that's considered this nifty thing called "spam." Oh well. In any case, I think calling it something a little more vague like World of Sanctuary might be a good thing, since we're going to have to stop bringing Diablo back from near death eventually, it gets rather redundant, lol.Posted in: News
-
Mar 28, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchPosted in: NewsQuote from "gamma11" »
zz basically saying world of non diablo infested world -.-... im liking "world of chuck" you start as mister t... then jackie chan... then bruce lee... then jesus... then god... then chuck norris... only move is roundhouse kick because you can kill anything with a round house kick... i mean cmon look at the dmg on that baby on the pokechuck card below... 6000 dmg for roundhouse kick... my chuck > ur charizard
Everyone was actually fighting over this a month or two ago (The "World of Sanctuary" thing.)
Woo! Off topic?
The first line was on topic; don't blame him- he knows not what he does xD -
Mar 28, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchPosted in: NewsQuote from "Noah" »lol magistre u son of a noob haha
And if they don't make a Diablo 3, maybe we could all just become awesome programmers and make our own -
Mar 28, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchPosted in: NewsQuote from "Noah" »well personally i don't think that they will be making another diablo but what do i know
Obviously nothing
Jk, jk... -
Mar 27, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchPosted in: NewsQuote from "LinkX" »Aye. It drives me insane. People find one little tiny coincidence and think that that means that Diablo 3 MUST be released on such and such date.
But what do I know. :rolleyes:
Yes, and then they'll all be wrong just like every other time. Oh, crap, I might be dispelled from the site under charges of herecy! -
Mar 26, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchI was just going to type lol to that last post, but I figured it would be spam. Oh well, lol.Posted in: News
-
Mar 26, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchI'm not sure about the dates, only that they announced it in a heavy SC fanbase country.Posted in: News
-
Mar 26, 2008Magistrate posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchWell, that art isn't anything like traditional Diablo art, it's too cartoony and all those metal fastenings aren't common of Diablo creatures.Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
0
As far as I've seen, for desktop PC's 1024x768 is still the singular most common screen resolution (if you don't lump screen resolutions together statistically). Regardless, the effects are so large and flashy, and there's often so much going on with the screen--UI, destructible environments, chat text, monsters storming in from every conceivable angle--that a larger screen doesn't do much to compensate. Or at least it didn't at Blizzcon '10.
Four player max is still fine with me, as it has been with the last six thousand polls exactly like this one. In Diablo II, whenever I played in an engaged party, there was typically only two or three other people with me, and this was very uncommon. It only really got up to eight when people were sitting around and leaching XP from grind runs.
Yes, "Diablo III will be a different game," blah blah blah. There's still something to be said for the past. People will group and leach. That's how it always, always, always is. I don't think that's a good reason to have huge party caps. And that's about the only reason I can see for doing so, since anything else is a minority fact.
0
Lol.
1) Not needy.
2) Listens.
That is all.
We need to start the DiabloFans personals.
0
The Diablo team doesn't keep getting funds from WoW. Development teams are given a set budget and must stick within that budget from the get-go. That's basically how it works in every company as far as such projects go. Movies, construction, software development...
Many highly-respected, revolutionary, and powerful companies employ the same tactics and it has been proven to not only increase creativity, but also productivity. Google, to name one.
The company basically fell apart as far as the Diablo franchise was concerned. They had to put all the pieces back together again.
0
0
0
I cry nearly every time I listen to it :*) It's so inspirational. Ronde des princesses (9 or so) is my second favorite part. Then probably Danse infernale de tous les sujets de Kastcheï.
God, I wish I could speak French. Or at least I think those titles are in French. Maybe Russian? Lol. I'm so ignorant.
0
0
Are you a... WIZARD?! :sorcerer:
0
0
0
The irony is that coal-powered factories and power stations in Ohio have been proven to infuse the atmosphere and land here in Pennsylvania with far more radiation than any of our nuclear plants. To my knowledge, nuclear plants give off nothing above natural radiation levels, which is what you'd find from the sun. My dad works in the reactors for fourteen hours every day and he leaves the plant every day without even the slightest hint of radiation on him.
This is a simple case of the media's long stance of demonizing nuclear power due to, as you said, common misconceptions, and then exploiting it for web hits and station stats. I can't tell you how many people I know off the top of my head that actually thought the steam that comes out of coolant towers was stuffed with radiation. I laugh every time I hear it. Anything that escapes from the plant, such as steam, either does not even touch the fuel rods (or the chassis) in the first place or is so thoroughly purified you could give it to your children.
But I guess The Simpsons is factual or something. I'm sure they put a lot of research into getting the sludge-green ooze color just right.
Is this scenario being downplayed? Exactly the opposite. I think it's getting more coverage than the Gulf oil spill, and that was far more destructive and harmful to the environment and mankind.
2
http://metalchaosblog.blogspot.com/2011_02_01_archive.html
0
With an AH, we can see prices so we have a ground for saying, no, that price is outrageous. We can see our options. We can get trades done faster because people who want what you have will be able to search for it with ease.
If this could be accessed at any time, whether ingame or not, it would be that much better. That way if you're levelling, you won't be missing out on the trade action. A complimentary peer-to-peer trading function for ingame purposes would still have to go alongside it, though.
0
If we could edit the source code, it would be a simple matter of going to where ever that thing is printed from and cutting out the link element or making the href void.