DiabloFans

Quote from "palmtrees" »

I agree that immunities were just annoying and didn't really add much to the gaming experience other than making breaking those said immunities top priority for certain classes (remember amp dmg?).

What I think it boils down to is hard counters vs soft counters. Immunities are hard counters and resistances are soft counters. People don't want to be rendered completely impotent because then there really is no point in playing.

Also, the idea of changing the types of monsters you fight is a great one! It would be significantly more work for the developers, but it sure would beat fighting skeletons of every color!

Quote from "Azylium" »

Really, we need it to become just as difficult as D2 was in Hell, without putting "Immune to X" on everything that moves. I would really like new monsters only seen on higher difficulties, rather than trying to recolor old ones. Monsters that have unique effects/spells that are predetermined instead of randomly chosen. So instead of just making monsters immune, make certain monsters only for higher difficulties. That way, we'd feel like it was more of a fresh experience, and they could give the new monsters a better combination of abilities and characteristics (Think the Berserker smash attack, things like that), that require skill to combat.

I think that'd be something I'd like to see. Then Hell mode could really feel like hell, since there'd be more hellish creatures;)

Quote from "Dimebog" »

Iron Maiden spell in A4 Hell was not nasty. It was beyond nasty. It was obviously buggy, or people who were in charge of balancing the game were eating some mushrooms.