DiabloFans

Quote from "edi-lupus" »

how about not "half-human" it would more likely be like a guy who kills creatures then takes part of there tortured soul, manipulates it untill he can turn part-way into it. (it would give better costumation ideas)

Kirby of the Diablo world?

I'm going to try to host a low lvl game around 4EST tonight. Bring your baby toons.

Quote from "Zhar" »

Join up on Eastern Sun US expanded, password is es.
We're still looking for more players, you're welcome to join ^^.

Sweet! Will do. I'll be on in a few mins.

I just got some D2 discs and Eastern Sun up yesterday.

Hamachi - Lunchbox
Toon - Lunchbox (Zealadin)

Hope to see some of you guys on one of these servers.

I doubt they have any of that guild/clan stuff ironed out yet. I imagine that communication systems come in the latter stages of development. They are still very much involved with game play.

Quote from "akse;" »

Also D2 synergies are really unfair. Some skills get huge amount of synergies while others don't making some skills too powerful compared to others. Before synergies the gap between skills wasn't so huge.

+1 to that. I mean, there was certain specs that were downright awful in D2. Perhaps with the elimination of synergies, every spec will have the potential to be powerful.

A ranged class that utilizes a bow. Nothing ground-breaking here.

Does the fact that Jay used "he" really matter? If each class has a male and a female version, what's the difference?

I would hope that Blizz keeps a similar style of items and their strengths in D3.

I wouldn't do a beta for this game. As someone who does testing on unreleased electronic devices as a 9-5, I find that I hate all of them because I had to deal with all the issues they had before release. I wouldn't want that for this game.

I voted 8 because I feel as though I'll have more than 3 friends playing at the same time. I may not fill up a game of 8 with my friends but I would certainly have someone sitting out with a 4 person max game.

A lot of these ideas sound great but I'm hoping that with better AI, these ideas won't be necessary.

You should only really have to turn attack on and off with the merc.

With attack off, the merc just follows, doesn't attack and doesn't take damage. If you turn attack on, it follows, attacks whatever you attack and takes damage. If the merc gets low on health and you turn attack off, it no longer takes damage. If you let the merc die, you have to pay to revive them.

To the hater, it seems like it's too easy to keep your mercs alive. To them I say, so what? It should be just as easy to watch your health and mana orbs and keep them up too, no? But you will die and so will your merc.

Quote from "Shiniku" »

Yeah. I know, and I cry myself to sleep every night.. seriously, why did they ever think this was a good decision?

It's just another thing that Blizz can implement to increase their ability to keep class balance. If we can't choose our own stats, then we can't find an overpowered stat allocation that they weren't expecting and therefore need to patch.

There's nothing wrong with seeing the set bonus.

Personally, I'd rather see the set bonus on the gear rather than find a random piece of gear and have to go to the web to see if it's worth keeping or not.

Class armor requirements worked fairly well in WoW. Certain classes ended up needing/using different types of armor but since D3 has individual loot drop, that doesn't matter in this game.

I would be OK with arena style PVE as long as there are no rewards at all. If there are rewards, it's just another way for people to find an exploit.

If arena style PVE was for fun only (no durability/gold loss) and bragging rights, I'm all for it.