I am probably a little bit older than you and my real life friend are not playing games.
- Pe3eWe3e
- Registered User
-
Member for 12 years, 7 months, and 17 days
Last active Mon, May, 1 2017 14:07:11
- 0 Followers
- 62 Total Posts
- 9 Thanks
-
Feb 8, 2017Pe3eWe3e posted a message on PTR Patch 2.5.0.43508Posted in: News
Quote from Luna_Nera87»
Sorry for my English, I love DH, but in recent times it is not possible to play in group gr 95+, I do not like to play solo, I like the group of friends to have fun together, I am sad to be able to play with my favorite char, That's all I feel.
So you need to run 95+ to have fun? how about running 80s, with your friends, with your favorite class instead?
Are you trolling? How many guys run anything below GR 100 in non season? How many Demon Hunters can play in group? Why my friend would play with me GR 95 when he can play with other friend in GR 105? Do I have to be everyone's best friend if I want to find group as DH? Am I a good friend if I ask them to sacrifice each time because of me?
-
Feb 8, 2017Pe3eWe3e posted a message on PTR Patch 2.5.0.43508Posted in: News
It was RIP long time ago. Fucking Blizzard.
Holy Point Shot is not even working with Shadow 6 set bonus.
-
Feb 19, 2012Pe3eWe3e posted a message on Diablofans Diablo 3 Beta Key Contests! 450 Keys to win!We will need to wait now for Character Skill Calculator Builds Contest Forum Thread!Posted in: News
I hope they update skill calculator soon, so we without beta can play with it. -
Feb 18, 2012Pe3eWe3e posted a message on Beta Auction House Changes IncomingI think this will be last BETA patcha that will introduce system changes. Thats the reason why they let so many people into beta at time point of a time.Posted in: News
-
Jan 4, 2012Pe3eWe3e posted a message on Diablo's Anniversary, South Korea Rating, Lashing Tail Kick RunedWe understand, you dont need to post same message 3 timesPosted in: News
-
Jan 3, 2012Pe3eWe3e posted a message on Hardcore PvP, Runed Meteor, Book of Cain, Beta ScreenshotsPosted in: NewsQuote from Molster
we're redoing them all, including new ones.Quote from Benegesserit
http://www.diablofan...estone-effects/
Why double post Meteor runed effects? We have SO MANY other spells to see runed!
don't worry, we have a brand new never seen (at least via a quick search on youtube) for tomorrow.
But as you can tell, a lot of people have yet to see it =)
I found this with quick search on youtube:
Diablo 3 Beta - Wizard: Hydra Runed
Diablo 3 Beta - Wizard: Teleport Runed -
Jan 3, 2012Pe3eWe3e posted a message on Hardcore PvP, Runed Meteor, Book of Cain, Beta ScreenshotsOpen Beta?Posted in: News
Discount for pre order?
Maybe something available only for Diablo 1 and Diablo 2 owners? -
Dec 31, 2011Pe3eWe3e posted a message on South Korea Rating, New Unique Flavor Text, Rare Follower Prefixes, Beta ScreenshotsWhat I think Game Rating Board is doing here is setting standard for this unique case. This is not only about Diablo 3, this is about all future games that will include something similary to RMAH Diablo 3 has. So right now they are not deciding faith of Diablo 3 only, they decide faith of all games that will follow Diablo 3 route of success.Posted in: News
-
Sep 17, 2011Pe3eWe3e posted a message on DiabloCast: Episode XXVIWhat about coutries where paypal is not supported? What about countries that can only send money and cant receive money using paypal?Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
The most interesting LBs for most players are 4 man LB and Solo LBs.
Here are the results for top 500 group and top 200 solo rankings for all regions excluding China:
http://imgur.com/a/C2PWx
As you can see Demon Hunter and Crusader are the only two classes that had 0% or close to 0% participation in group play for 4 ERAs in total, last 4 ERAs in row. This are also the ERAs with highest group clears. Demon Hunter was dominant in first two ERAs and participated in 3rd Era fairly but Max group Clears in first two eras where 64 and 67 respectively which is nowhere close to what groups where able to do later (130 GR clears in ERA 6 for example). Season 3 ended on August 23 2015 and if I remember correctly ERA 3 ended on same date. So when ERA 7 ends it will be way more than a year since DH and Crusader had their spot in 4 man groups.
Witch Doctor is the only class that had its spot in 4 man groups each ERA. Just like Demon Hunter, Witch Doctor was never the best solo clear class.
Monks and Barb had 0% or close to 0% participation in group play in first 3 ERAs but later they had constant spot in groups that gained most Paragons by clearing 100+ GRs. Barbs where dominant in solo play first two ERAs, specially first ERA when they where able to clear GR 60 which is only 4 levels below the best 4 man group with two Demon Hunters.
Wizard had insane 95% participation in solo rankings for ERA 6. They where also the main DPS in groups in ERA 5 and ERA 6 when we saw higest GRs cleared in history of Diablo 3. Three ERAs Wizard was the best solo class. They still see some above avarage use in groups for ERA 7.
EDIT: corrected few % by 0.5
0
Don't know where your info is comming from guys. Go and read my post here:
http://eu.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/17610974126
The support guy did not even know that happend before I told him. So it seems they are not doing it manualy. I think It is done automatically when your game licence status is changed. Same happend to me before long time ago when my account was hacked for real. I had to wait for maintenance and after it I was back on LB.
0
@Bagstone
They are not removed from there as older LBs are already locked like I already wrote.
0
And here is what I think they are banning for.
1 click = 1 action in game = you are safe
number of clicks < number of actions in game = you are banned
I think they just don't care if you used this or that software or even macro. They just ban you.
So I think using macro will ban you while using map hack will no ban you sadly.
They can do this without scanning you memory, in compliance with privacy law.
If they want to detect someone with Map hack I think they will have to use totally different detection methods.
0
Problem with no ban wave for non season is TIME. For example some people where banned and their record was removed but only for this season. If you check LB for previous season you can still find them there. This is because LB is locked when season/era ends. Now we know season 6 and current era will end 15th April. We also know there where 4 ban waves for season now. First ban wave was 15 days ago. So I just wonder how much time is left to ban in non season also.
Word in my clan now is that season players are used to start from 0 so they will most probably buy new game. On the other side are non season players that hate to start from 0 and if they ban them they know they will not come back to the game.
0
0
0
Nothing new on non season LB. Time is running out.
0
Season only again?
0
They can't share data because no one is close to 2.5K Paragon. Bug that was used to gather data about Paragon system was fixed.
1
I hope it is extremely exponential after paragon 2500. They probably selected paragon 2500 because they are sure no one will reach it before 2.3 is out.
0
I tested Physical yesterday and finished 48 easy in 12 minutes. For now it seems good.
0
0
"So I did take a closer look at your video and I want to share my thoughts with you:
In your particular rift, you encountered a lot of small worthless monsters, like those skeletons, but also big valuable creatures like savage beasts and punishers, and indeed did you fight 5+ monsters for quite some time. However, it was an open space map and a pretty long rift, so the density wasn't the best overall."
If you like I can help you with Excel project/calculator if you wish. I had all actual damage numbers (crit non cirt) in excel for pre patch sentry builds and combos. I think good calculation has to include monster type, HP, and amount of progress they give. The key here is progress per HP killed is not same for all monsters (it seems).I saw post on official forums about it not long time ago. Some guy listed all monsters and pregress % they give. 0.5% progress is not bad if you get it fast. That needs to be taken into account.
"Nearly none of your elite packs had you fighting more than 3 or 4 targets at a time (see 2:45, 4:00, 6:00, 7:20), and those punishers and leftover skeletons easily account for 1/3 or even more of the fight length in most cases (see 0:50, 1:40, 4:30, 5:00, 7:05)."
I don't know how you can see this because I can't see it when I look at my own video :). Few of the packs are offscreen all the time.
"In addition to that, it took you about 1:50 to kill one of the easy go-to single-target-only RGs on tier 47, and you even managed to refresh your BotP exactly 5 seconds before he spawned.I've taken a look at your profile and can see that you items are comparable to mine, your gems are even higher than mine, and paragon is almost the same, so we can assume that we have pretty much exactly the same potential damage output (discounting your advantage in ancient items). You used Steady Aim to clear the rift, yet I can use Single Out / Taeguk / Shooting Stars and kill the RG in approximately the same time on tier 52 (+/- 10 sec), which is a little more than double the HP of tier 47, while not losing out on the trash (perhaps even gaining) and certainly not on elites."
It is not a secret cold is bad for single target. But in your video you got perfect boss for Physical build. You fought Stonesinger and he has health link with his adds. And there are total of 3 targets. I would kill him faster with same cold build on 52 then I killed Choker on 47. Using Single Out is only good for single target and don't forget there is a hard cap for crit chance at 75%. BotP at max is still less damage then Taeguk at lvl 60.
I think any good calculation must take into account HP of small monsters, Boss, and Big monsters and progress they give. To have a good approximation about time spent fighting 1, 2, 3 ,4 or 5 targets you need to take into account possible targets HP.
Simple calculation shows that if you fight 5 targets 40% of time, 4 targets 20% of time, 3 targets 10% of time, 2 targets 10% of time and 1 target 10% of time and if all targets give same progress per HP killed cold does more damage overall. But it seems that is not the case.
900*5*0.4+900*4*0.2+900*3*0.1+900*2*0.1+900*1*0.1=1800+720+270+180+90=3060% for cold
1200*3*0.4+1200*3*0.2+1200*3*0.1+1200*2*0.1+1200*1*0.1=1440+720+360+240+120=2880% for physical
Until someone (including me) pass 52 using other build I will consider your research as correct.
0
VIDEO here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzu8GFPdv20
I can't think of big monster that gives you good progress and that is so dangerous for you. For example: Punisher, Executioner, Mallet lord, Unburied, Disentombed Hulks all give good progress and present 0 danger to you. If you get only 3 of them then why no push forward and find +2 monsters for more overall damage? Also best monster you can get are Bears and you find more then 5 of them always. Champion packs (most HP) also have boss + minions > 3.
At the end I would say we agree that Physical is better in some Greater Rifts but we don't agree Physical is better ~10% for almost all Greater rifts.
In my opinion "hidden" benefit of Haxing Pants is that you can keep Teaguk up more easy then with Prides Falls. At least it is case with me after 15 min testing. Maybe when I get used to this a bit more I will change my mind.
I did not suggest LfB for solo, it is just disaster for solo. Cold and Physical gives you guaranteed damage while LfB is too situational. I just said that for single target LfB is still better then Physical which is true.