Quote from Bisso
Quote from insanetrasher
Give me at least 2008 graphics and I'd trade D3 for D2 anytime. I'd even pay 60$ for it, nothing changed to gameplay (except maybe potions spamming removed) just updated graphics (and not even today's graphics).
Personally, I am suprised no one came up with some kind of patch that would basicly just upscale the whole game via a post processing shader. Just enough so it can smooth pixels out to be a bit easier on the eyes. À-la- SNES emulators upscale filters.
I doubt it would do the trick to make it acceptable to play again. But on a side note there are already custom patches that enables higher resolution, but it doesnt scale with the action bar so it looks weird.
Anyways, beside some limited gameplay features, D2 was so amazing in terms of art style (for its time indeed) and the environments were always fun to play over and over (and more randomized than D3 linear acts/lacks of dungeons). I'm so underwhelmed by D3 in those aspects... too bad Blizz North didn't live to make D3.
0
I think the fact that we all pre-loaded the xpac about 2 weeks prior launch was a huge help toward a perfect launch.
Did I just put perfect and launch in the same sentence...
0
0
0
But that said it looks promising for EU and US launches.
0
If its stable its "playable" at best, not great
0
0
0
1
Actually I'll have to take it the next monday... but it's fine since I'll prolly already have cleared Act V and leveled my crusader to 70 so I can start farming gear.
0
0
0
^
1
And why wouldn't they add Malthael a guaranted leg instead of Diablo, maybe its already in upon release (no reason not to do that)?
For me its more like:
- Gain more paragon/get some nice lvl 60 legs
* RoS is live
- Clear Act V and reach 70
- Play a couple hours on adventure mode/ get some lvl 70 legs
- Roll a Hammerdin
Just clear act V then have fun on adventure mode.
0
0