So they are re-evaluating some samples that the probe from mars took around (I think 1974, whenever it landed / came back). In the past they passed off the samples as 'geometric anomalies', but now they are saying that the rocks contain real bacteria, proof of life outside of Earth. Honestly it only makes sense there is other life, but still proof helps out =D Expect this to be buried by the media though, it's hard to find now lol.
Another thought; I hate being treated like a small child by our / the worlds governments. It's obvious they know way more then they let on, and I just wish we could expand and grow as a race, I'm talking space exploration and broadening our horizons so to speak. Figuring out actual space travel, whether it be a mercury vortex engine, an anti-matter engine, and actual warp drive / slipstream, whatever, and colonizing other planets.
It makes me sad most of us are content (maybe brainwashed but that's another discussion) to just 'buy a house, get married, have kids and then die' - repeat. I don't know what happened, and hell maybe I need to get off my ass and instead of complaining on a random thread on a forum, actually go do something, IDK.
I think things have been deterred by our potential extinction. We have no means to provide for the people of this plant with the technology we have, if we don't figure something else beyond fossil fuels that space travel isn't going to mean anything. Not to mention were relying on a form of energy for over a century now, it's hard to progress without some significant discovery. With our current means we have no chance in hell to reach let alone colonize other planets when we can barely get by right now. I'm going to check out those links for the Tyson guy see what he has to say...
I still agree with your view point.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Playing Diablo since 97. I know nothing and having nothing good to say, I be a troll.
Damn! Greg Ham from Men at Work died at fricken 58! BAH! That sucks.
Need to think of happier things
No mention of Dick Clark?
Yeah because Dick Clark was at least 83, but 58 is like damn! Also I've seen a number of interviews and read stories over the years about him, he was not well liked by those who worked with him. Dick was uhm... how shall I say it? Dick was a dick.
So they are re-evaluating some samples that the probe from mars took around (I think 1974, whenever it landed / came back). In the past they passed off the samples as 'geometric anomalies', but now they are saying that the rocks contain real bacteria, proof of life outside of Earth. Honestly it only makes sense there is other life, but still proof helps out =D Expect this to be buried by the media though, it's hard to find now lol.
Another thought; I hate being treated like a small child by our / the worlds governments. It's obvious they know way more then they let on, and I just wish we could expand and grow as a race, I'm talking space exploration and broadening our horizons so to speak. Figuring out actual space travel, whether it be a mercury vortex engine, an anti-matter engine, and actual warp drive / slipstream, whatever, and colonizing other planets.
It makes me sad most of us are content (maybe brainwashed but that's another discussion) to just 'buy a house, get married, have kids and then die' - repeat. I don't know what happened, and hell maybe I need to get off my ass and instead of complaining on a random thread on a forum, actually go do something, IDK.
I think things have been deterred by our potential extinction. We have no means to provide for the people of this plant with the technology we have, if we don't figure something else beyond fossil fuels that space travel isn't going to mean anything. Not to mention were relying on a form of energy for over a century now, it's hard to progress without some significant discovery. With our current means we have no chance in hell to reach let alone colonize other planets when we can barely get by right now. I'm going to check out those links for the Tyson guy see what he has to say...
I still agree with your view point.
That's why I get angry. We HAVE already discovered many different types of what would be considered a significant discovery in the fields of fuel, engines and travel! Tesla himself created a free energy machine, one nickname being the N-machine. But for some odd ass reason society went with Edisons' electric motor.
Tesla's free energy machine (yes it can exist, don't believe everything you read in mainstream physics, half of it is bullshit), was re-created in ~ 1978 and called the sunburst machine. It's literally just a rotating magnet with some wires. It creates OVER 100% of the energy used to turn it, meaning it can power itself plus other things, creating free energy. Tesla had no idea how it worked for years, until he theorized that magnetic fields are actually stationary in the universe, and certain objects pull the field out of it's either dormant state otherwise, or it's existence in sub-space.
I realize I speak about this a lot, but it literally baffles me that people not only do not care, they actually, without any research on their part, disbelieve me simply because 'their professor told them it can't mathematically exist'.
Well guess what guys. You know how you were told 'by physics' that gravity pulls at a constant rate, and nothing save for something like air resistance changes that? Then explain how by taking two ball bearings (such as pinball machine ones) and spinning one of them, that the one that's spinning actually falls faster. It's actually easy to explain, it's because of the vortex it creates. This of course leads into the mercury-vortex engine, which when spinning fast enough, can reduce a matters weight by almost 70%. (ever wonder how a tornado, only going about anywhere from 100mph - 300mph can lift a 30 + TON farm machine off the ground and toss it? Yest hurricane winds of the same mph can barely move a mass 1/5th that, or lighter even?)
Anyways RABBBLERABBLE, I know. the TLDR;
Not only do we already have the means to create engines that can potentially power everything from entire countries to space travel, but it's simple. The sad part is that government, and even giant companies would rather suppress the technology and instead make money. (take a look at marijuana, and who first started the campaign against it back in the earlier 1900's; Paper companies. Why you ask? Is it a coincidence that in the first year that the campaigns against it started, a machine had been invented that would be able to harvest whole fields extremely fast? How about the fact that marijuana can grow over 4 times a year, and create more paper than an equal acre of trees? And that marijuana besides have extremely strong, durable paper, also has over 100 uses, including rope, medicine, grain for animals, ect. And it also doesn't hurt the environment to harvest it even if the sole purpose is for paper, because hell it grows back! Trees on the other hand take decades.)
Free energy machine?
I am too lazy to try and disprove this. I'm only wondering what's preventing people from using it if it's available/can be done, let alone governments implementing it on a world-wide basis.
Or is everybody conspiring on this one?
I mean it's not like resources were pooled in one area or controlled by one segment of society. It's (relatively) widely distributed and surely an investment into a free-energy machine will most likely turn out to be hugely profitable in the long run, making it a very desirable/sought-after commodity for...everybody.
So my question is- if it works, what is holding people back?
I'm no expert on this topic but I do know over the years the oil companies have been implicated in trying squelch alternative fuels that have been promising. They have definitely fought the automobile industry on alternative fuels as well many times.
There may be a more insidious economic reason most people have not considered though. In June of 1974, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger established the US-Saudi Arabian Joint Commission on Economic Cooperation. One of the major components of this commission stated that OPEC would officially agree to sell its oil only for dollars—meaning any country purchasing oil from OPEC had to pay in U.S. dollars.
After the Bretton Woods agreement ended in 1971, the US was at risk of losing it's reserve currency status, the 1974 act reestablished the dollar as the global monetary instrument and oil now replaced gold as basis for a strong dollar. Countries competed for dollars and they accumulated huge dollar reserves to sustain their own currencies.
If you think about this for a moment it explains many things. It explains why we kiss the Saudi’s butts, why Israel is so important to us, the Gulf War, The Iraq War, everything we have done militarily in the Mideast, and why we spend so much on defense. It also explains how we have been able to strong arm other nations in to purchasing our debt even when they don’t want to. If oil is threatened the dollar is threatened.
The dollar is backed by oil, what is holding us back are old crusty crotches in power trying to maintain the status-quo. This entire economic crisis is a struggle for power and control, energy is a big piece of it.
I may be misunderstanding you here but I thought you were implying that some corporations and companies were directly acting to stifle any progress or implementation of a free-energy system?
In the age of technology and information, you think any engineering plans for the construction of the free-energy machine can be successfully made to disappear?
That the thousands of people who have the resources and intellect to build such a system are being actively suppressed all over the world?
This is deeply illogical talk and too much of a conspiracy-theory approach for me.
It's not a conspiracy theory, the dollar is literally backed by oil, it's often referred to as the petrol-dollar. Secretary of state Henry Kissinger in 1974 negotiated the the US-Saudi Arabian Joint Commission on Economic Cooperation. That agreement made it so OPEC oil could only be purchased in US dollars. In other words in order to by OPEC oil, the world MUST first buy US dollars.
This isn't just about oil, it's about the US government fighting to keep it's reserve currency status. If oil is not needed, the dollar is not the reserve currency any longer because demand for dollars would fall off like a lead anvil.
Isn't this a most excellent reason for other countries to develop the free-energy system?
How about North Korea? The US doesn't seem to have much of an effect on them.
Russia?
India?
The rest of the world?
Individuals in the rest of the world?
One dude managed to go on a 10 year holiday trip while being the most wanted man on the planet.
You are telling me the same government can actually suppress the thousands and MILLIONS of others from doing their own little science project at home?
A science project that will show free energy is just science fiction.
I won't say it's impossible. However it's so highly improbable, I can't even bring myself to take this seriously.
Need to think of happier things
So much awesomeness wrapped up in one song, I can't wait for the album release in June!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcFGrWjOX0E
I think things have been deterred by our potential extinction. We have no means to provide for the people of this plant with the technology we have, if we don't figure something else beyond fossil fuels that space travel isn't going to mean anything. Not to mention were relying on a form of energy for over a century now, it's hard to progress without some significant discovery. With our current means we have no chance in hell to reach let alone colonize other planets when we can barely get by right now. I'm going to check out those links for the Tyson guy see what he has to say...
I still agree with your view point.
No mention of Dick Clark?
http://www.thesouptv.com/latest/that-s-no-school-/308511
Yeah because Dick Clark was at least 83, but 58 is like damn! Also I've seen a number of interviews and read stories over the years about him, he was not well liked by those who worked with him. Dick was uhm... how shall I say it? Dick was a dick.
That rulz!
That's why I get angry. We HAVE already discovered many different types of what would be considered a significant discovery in the fields of fuel, engines and travel! Tesla himself created a free energy machine, one nickname being the N-machine. But for some odd ass reason society went with Edisons' electric motor.
Tesla's free energy machine (yes it can exist, don't believe everything you read in mainstream physics, half of it is bullshit), was re-created in ~ 1978 and called the sunburst machine. It's literally just a rotating magnet with some wires. It creates OVER 100% of the energy used to turn it, meaning it can power itself plus other things, creating free energy. Tesla had no idea how it worked for years, until he theorized that magnetic fields are actually stationary in the universe, and certain objects pull the field out of it's either dormant state otherwise, or it's existence in sub-space.
I realize I speak about this a lot, but it literally baffles me that people not only do not care, they actually, without any research on their part, disbelieve me simply because 'their professor told them it can't mathematically exist'.
Well guess what guys. You know how you were told 'by physics' that gravity pulls at a constant rate, and nothing save for something like air resistance changes that? Then explain how by taking two ball bearings (such as pinball machine ones) and spinning one of them, that the one that's spinning actually falls faster. It's actually easy to explain, it's because of the vortex it creates. This of course leads into the mercury-vortex engine, which when spinning fast enough, can reduce a matters weight by almost 70%. (ever wonder how a tornado, only going about anywhere from 100mph - 300mph can lift a 30 + TON farm machine off the ground and toss it? Yest hurricane winds of the same mph can barely move a mass 1/5th that, or lighter even?)
Anyways RABBBLERABBLE, I know. the TLDR;
Not only do we already have the means to create engines that can potentially power everything from entire countries to space travel, but it's simple. The sad part is that government, and even giant companies would rather suppress the technology and instead make money. (take a look at marijuana, and who first started the campaign against it back in the earlier 1900's; Paper companies. Why you ask? Is it a coincidence that in the first year that the campaigns against it started, a machine had been invented that would be able to harvest whole fields extremely fast? How about the fact that marijuana can grow over 4 times a year, and create more paper than an equal acre of trees? And that marijuana besides have extremely strong, durable paper, also has over 100 uses, including rope, medicine, grain for animals, ect. And it also doesn't hurt the environment to harvest it even if the sole purpose is for paper, because hell it grows back! Trees on the other hand take decades.)
Lol @ my TLDR still being long =/
Edit: the REAL TLDR;
I hate everybody D=
Dafuq...haha, next time I get angry in an argument I'm going to do exactly that!! People will praise me!
Awesome! I read that to mean the death of Dick Clark has averted the end of the world and given all of us immortality!
VegasRage McCloud of the clan McCloud at your service.
Free energy machine?
I am too lazy to try and disprove this. I'm only wondering what's preventing people from using it if it's available/can be done, let alone governments implementing it on a world-wide basis.
Or is everybody conspiring on this one?
I mean it's not like resources were pooled in one area or controlled by one segment of society. It's (relatively) widely distributed and surely an investment into a free-energy machine will most likely turn out to be hugely profitable in the long run, making it a very desirable/sought-after commodity for...everybody.
So my question is- if it works, what is holding people back?
There may be a more insidious economic reason most people have not considered though. In June of 1974, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger established the US-Saudi Arabian Joint Commission on Economic Cooperation. One of the major components of this commission stated that OPEC would officially agree to sell its oil only for dollars—meaning any country purchasing oil from OPEC had to pay in U.S. dollars.
After the Bretton Woods agreement ended in 1971, the US was at risk of losing it's reserve currency status, the 1974 act reestablished the dollar as the global monetary instrument and oil now replaced gold as basis for a strong dollar. Countries competed for dollars and they accumulated huge dollar reserves to sustain their own currencies.
If you think about this for a moment it explains many things. It explains why we kiss the Saudi’s butts, why Israel is so important to us, the Gulf War, The Iraq War, everything we have done militarily in the Mideast, and why we spend so much on defense. It also explains how we have been able to strong arm other nations in to purchasing our debt even when they don’t want to. If oil is threatened the dollar is threatened.
I honestly still can't see what is holding us back.
In the age of technology and information, you think any engineering plans for the construction of the free-energy machine can be successfully made to disappear?
That the thousands of people who have the resources and intellect to build such a system are being actively suppressed all over the world?
This is deeply illogical talk and too much of a conspiracy-theory approach for me.
This isn't just about oil, it's about the US government fighting to keep it's reserve currency status. If oil is not needed, the dollar is not the reserve currency any longer because demand for dollars would fall off like a lead anvil.
How about North Korea? The US doesn't seem to have much of an effect on them.
Russia?
India?
The rest of the world?
Individuals in the rest of the world?
One dude managed to go on a 10 year holiday trip while being the most wanted man on the planet.
You are telling me the same government can actually suppress the thousands and MILLIONS of others from doing their own little science project at home?
A science project that will show free energy is just science fiction.
I won't say it's impossible. However it's so highly improbable, I can't even bring myself to take this seriously.
Night folks.