I’m going to go with Baal. No particular reason I just like him the most.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"The most tragic thing about religion is that evangelical people who have such a degree of blind faith, who do and believe terrible things because they are sold as the will of God. Unfortunately this is almost half of America and leads to such things as electing George Bush, twice..."
I think it would be close between Baal and Diablo. But ultimately, Baal was my choice since he has the ability to clone himself and has the ability to tangle up diablo with his tenticles.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Those before me shall quiver in my wake as I unleash the fury within!
id go with Diablo, Mephisto would be instantly destroyed, he is the easiest of the three to beat and wouldn't really stand a chance. Then it would be a battle between Diablo and Baal. It would be interesnting, almost fire against ice but i feel that diablo would pull out the victor.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"I'm like a dog chasing cars." - Joker, Dark Knight
Stated from the Blizzard website and experience of the Pandemonium event here it is:
Diablo is the TANK
Baal is the DOTTER (Damage Over Time)
Mephisto is the ARTILLERY
My opinion would be between Baal and Mephisto, both do range damage and can probally take Diablo down by attacking from afar despite Diablo's Fire Nova. Baal will try to use range and timing to his advantage (Clone, Tentacle, ETC) while Mephisto on the other hand would use Pure Damage. Between the two, its a matter of chance and focus, If Mephisto manages to use all his power on the original Baal (with clone), Baal's dead, however if he attack the clone, then Mephisto is dead.
Stated from the Blizzard website and experience of the Pandemonium event here it is:
Diablo is the TANK Baal is the DOTTER (Damage Over Time) Mephisto is the ARTILLERY
My opinion would be between Baal and Mephisto, both do range damage and can probally take Diablo down by attacking from afar despite Diablo's Fire Nova. Baal will try to use range and timing to his advantage (Clone, Tentacle, ETC) while Mephisto on the other hand would use Pure Damage. Between the two, its a matter of chance and focus, If Mephisto manages to use all his power on the original Baal (with clone), Baal's dead, however if he attack the clone, then Mephisto is dead.
Anyways, I'm voting for Mephisto
If your going to post a intelligent or near-intelligent opinion, take this post into account XD
Diablo is the TANK
Baal is the DOTTER (Damage Over Time)
Mephisto is the ARTILLERY
My opinion would be between Baal and Mephisto, both do range damage and can probally take Diablo down by attacking from afar despite Diablo's Fire Nova. Baal will try to use range and timing to his advantage (Clone, Tentacle, ETC) while Mephisto on the other hand would use Pure Damage. Between the two, its a matter of chance and focus, If Mephisto manages to use all his power on the original Baal (with clone), Baal's dead, however if he attack the clone, then Mephisto is dead.
Except Diablo is one hell of a fast runner, and neither of the two have any close range attacks that can stand up to his Red Lightning Hose. Given the amoun tof life that all three have, it doesn't matter if either Mephisto or Baal manage to blast Diablo like hell for a few seconds before he closes up, he will still be able to take them down.
However, judging this from a lore perspective, it's much harder to say, and I don't think we'll ever see enough of the Three in order to make a definite judgment of the situation. Since Diablo has been stated as being the strongest however, I'd go with him even there as of now.
PlugY for Diablo II allows you to reset skills and stats, transfer items between characters in singleplayer, obtain all ladder runewords and do all Uberquests while offline. It is the only way to do all of the above. Please use it.
Supporting big shoulderpads and flashy armor since 2004.
in your avatar i always wondered how the wanderer was carrying the soul stone that was supposedly in his head... and why his mouth was sewn shut..
can anyone explain?>
He has removed the stone from his head because pretty most of Diablo's soul has passed into his. He continues to carry the stone a while longer, and when it is utterly spent, he casts it away (as seen in the trailer the pic came from). He is now almost completely consumed by Diablo. Unfortunately, it seems they neglected to give evidence of the hole the soulstone left in his head - perhaps it was somehow healed by Diablo etc.
...or whoever made the trailer just forgot.
The sewn shut mouth is a bit of an inconsistency as well, I think. In the cinematics included in Diablo II, there is no evidence of the wanderers lips having ever been sewn when we see him talking to Marius. I don't know who would have sewn his mouth shut, nor when it would have happened (some time between when he kills Diablo at the end of Diablo I, and when he decides to journey to the desert. And when was his mouth unsewn? I don't think anyone would have really bothered to check the consitency there.
Diablo would win hands down. Mephisto wouldnt stand a chance because Diablo and Baal would pull the good ol' Moat Trick on him, leaving him attackless and defenseless. Diablo would simply have to use his Red Lightning on Baal while he was crackin a joke. This fight wouldnt last 5 minutes. It would simply be "Hey knock knock..*dead*" GAME OVER.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Well, I could even talk seriously and personally about sex without saying something akin to, "My girlfriend and I have had sexual intercourse not once, not twice, but thrice. During these times I had inserted my penis in and out of her vagina and ejaculated accordingly. I gently sobbed afterwards while she held me in her arms. This has all brought us closer together."
--Siaynoq
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZRQEtAyiTM
You have to admit that he's good.
-Obalobex
CyberPunk RP Nexus
My LOD CD exploded the day before the nocd patch, and took my DVD drive with it....
Diablo is the TANK
Baal is the DOTTER (Damage Over Time)
Mephisto is the ARTILLERY
My opinion would be between Baal and Mephisto, both do range damage and can probally take Diablo down by attacking from afar despite Diablo's Fire Nova. Baal will try to use range and timing to his advantage (Clone, Tentacle, ETC) while Mephisto on the other hand would use Pure Damage. Between the two, its a matter of chance and focus, If Mephisto manages to use all his power on the original Baal (with clone), Baal's dead, however if he attack the clone, then Mephisto is dead.
Anyways, I'm voting for Mephisto
If your going to post a intelligent or near-intelligent opinion, take this post into account XD
in your avatar i always wondered how the wanderer was carrying the soul stone that was supposedly in his head... and why his mouth was sewn shut..
can anyone explain?>
However, judging this from a lore perspective, it's much harder to say, and I don't think we'll ever see enough of the Three in order to make a definite judgment of the situation. Since Diablo has been stated as being the strongest however, I'd go with him even there as of now.
He has removed the stone from his head because pretty most of Diablo's soul has passed into his. He continues to carry the stone a while longer, and when it is utterly spent, he casts it away (as seen in the trailer the pic came from). He is now almost completely consumed by Diablo. Unfortunately, it seems they neglected to give evidence of the hole the soulstone left in his head - perhaps it was somehow healed by Diablo etc.
...or whoever made the trailer just forgot.
The sewn shut mouth is a bit of an inconsistency as well, I think. In the cinematics included in Diablo II, there is no evidence of the wanderers lips having ever been sewn when we see him talking to Marius. I don't know who would have sewn his mouth shut, nor when it would have happened (some time between when he kills Diablo at the end of Diablo I, and when he decides to journey to the desert. And when was his mouth unsewn? I don't think anyone would have really bothered to check the consitency there.
--Siaynoq