Hate to say this, a couple of your signatures cannot be used as it violates Rule 4D, one is 200 pixels tall and the other is 209, and you can only have a signature 150 pixels tall.
Other then that, best of luck to your signature-making future!!!
- Magistrate
- Registered User
-
Member for 16 years, 10 months, and 3 days
Last active Wed, Oct, 5 2022 13:28:23
- 55 Followers
- 14,646 Total Posts
- 354 Thanks
-
1
LinkX posted a message on [Art] Oath's Signature EmporiumPosted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo) -
1
Terror posted a message on Battle Net 2 ScreenshotsBnet 2.0Posted in: Starcraft & SC2
:thumbsup: -
1
Jetrall posted a message on Diablofans Redesign launching tomorrowI'm going to go ahead and assume that it's all right for me to help out and try to look into these errors myself and fix them. I'll work on the colour errors and also go ahead and see if I can come up with anything clever for the buttons and icons. Maybe they'll just be replaced in a few hours but I don't care. I just want to do something.Posted in: Backstage Archives (Pre-Release)
Also, I am disliking this background more and more every moment. :/
EDIT: One last thing. I would like to remove the underlines from links. It looks cluttered and awful (as Seth already pointed out). -
1
Daemaro posted a message on Φ Monk ClassWho called it?!Posted in: Monk: The Inner Sanctuary
And people doubted me and said the idea was stupid. -
1
Siaynoq posted a message on Should I change my username?I can understand not feeling like a certain name represents you anymore. My early computer names were Shipgate and Maabus. And now I don't really like those anymore. However, if you change your name I'll totally forget you, man!Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo) -
1
mockery posted a message on Diablofans Redesign launching tomorrowPosted in: Backstage Archives (Pre-Release)
Yeah, it will be fully integrated with everything from the forums to the wiki and any other new features we add on. And things will probably look less cluttered once it's actually launched and the content is filled in. All you're seeing there is a sample test page.Quote from "Seth" »I like it, I really do. I think it does look a tad cluttered, but that's mostly because of the amount of links and stuff all over the place, which are organized in their own right, so it doesn't bother me heavily. Now, this is going to be fully integrated with everything already on the site, correct? Blogs, Social Groups (thought they're a bit useless), and stuff?
I'm not sure how those features will work with the other themes or if they're going to be abandoned completely. I'll try to get some confirmation from Curse on that.Quote from "Seth" »Also, you mentioned that this new design is going to be the building structure for all the new things that could possibly be implemented with the site. Would I be correct in assuming that those features will be tailored to work with the other two themes or will they be abandoned in favor of this new one?
Yeah, good call, I'll ask them to see if we need some more consistent names for the tracker. I think part of the reason for having the names the way they currently are is for search engine optimization (which is DoranM's specialty).Quote from "Seth" »I noticed that the tracker is called the "Blizz Tracker" now. Currently on our front page it's called the "Blue Tracker" and on the forums it's called the "Developer Tracker". When this is implemented, could we possible get it all to conform so we don't have a bunch of different names for the same thing?
Yeah, I asked for that once before and it never happened, but I'll bring it up again.Quote from "Seth" »And lastly, I think Rykker mentioned something similar to this before, but can we have the Blizz Tracker set so that it tracks all Blizzard posters in all of the Diablo forums on the Battle.net board? I mean, Diablo III probably isn't going to be released for a year or two, anyway, so it might be good to have constant feeds on Diablo II stuff, as well, since that's proven to supply a few articles here and there. Just a...ah... suggestion, I guess. -
2
m0n0x1d3 posted a message on First Look at Gamescom Demo?Just stumbled upon this during my morning ritual before settling into workPosted in: Diablo III General Discussion
http://kotaku.com/5340558/diablo-iii-impressions-hands-on-with-the-barbarian
Description of new areas, Sundered Pass and Alcarnus, and new monsters, Sand Wasps and Desert Dervish.
No surprise that there would be no new class at Gamescom.
Just thought I would pass this along in case it hadn't already been noticed.
Cheers,
m0n0x1d3
Edit: Also mention of an NPC named Asheara, which if I recall correctly was the name of the merc hire NPC, leader of the Iron Wolves in Act 3 in DII. -
1
Absolut posted a message on Blizzard's Three New Twitter Contests Are Live!more so the fact that people would be killing each other over a pin hahaha.Posted in: News & Announcements -
1
Dimebog posted a message on Skill Respecs Confirmed for D2There is nothing "permanent" about your character in D2. You can move your items, delete your character, make a new one and rush it to 85 in one day, get the items back. Free respec in one day.Posted in: Diablo II
If they fix rushing (meaning that it MUST take you months to build a character) and implement a cooldown on the respec function, they can make it more restrictive than it used to be. And I am absolutely sure they will make it restrictive.
Try and argue with that. -
1
DesmondTiny posted a message on Family Guy VS. South ParkThe southpark episode I thought was halarious was the WoW one lolPosted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo) - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
1
1
1
Even as the demon's sword impaled his chest and sent him hurtling back in to a rotting, ancient pillar, the vile creature grinned insidiously.
Darrian struggled to his feet and fixed his hands upon the handle of his massive weapon, "In the name of Torm I cast this demon back to the Nine Hells!"
As his hammer fell throw the air, a distant enchantment echoed throw the shadows: "Praeses, Alia, Fero!"
Darrian's hammer stopped as if it had crashed into wall and then become stuck in it. His eyes contorted in confusion and surprise, "What new devilry has this creature summoned?"
A man slid out of the shadows to his right, robed in brown, his thumb and middle finger fixed on his temples, his right hand extended toward the motionless hammerhead. His hands then fell, his concentration broken, and he looked hard at Darrian, "The demon has said that your anger feeds him- do not raise your weapon upon him just yet-"
Darrian nudged him away, "Who are you- no, you do not concern me. Go about your business, there is a demon to be slayed and a wizard will not step in my way!"
He slung his hammer once again throw the air and in to the robed demon. He was tossed aside like a rag doll in a hurricane, tattered, blackened robes and bits of shadow collapsing and hurtling to the ground.
"See? There is no beast that can withstand my hammer!" laughed Darrian haughtily.
As he spoke the demon raised itself from the dusty floor, growing taller and larger than before, a thicker darkness and twang of terror upon him this time. His sword seemed somehow more solid and flickered with a wicked black lightning. His eyes grew brighter still, and he laughed.
1
They aren't all bad. There were a few good ones, and everyone does have a right to discuss the possibilites.
2
Oh, okay. I guess it just depends on your point of view, then. For instance, I'm really sick of people with 3 posts coming in and when I say, "There's always a possibility that it won't be Diablo III- like MD said, it could also be WC IV or just more hype for WotLK," saying to me, "Evry1 who thinkz is WC4 F U!!one11!"
The majority of people that have this pattern of joining, posting once or twice, and then never posting again once the event(s) is(are) over 1) have no information to back up their argument, 2) are hopeless fan bois that ignorantly believe things without proper review of the facts, 3) flame for no reason, 4) don't thoroughly read through posts and then flame the person, 5) spam incessently, 6) all post "I've been watching this forum for x years and have been playing Diablo since it came out," 7) regurgitate what has already been said at least once on every single page and then say, "WTF I DONT WANTZ 2 REED TEH HOLE F***IN THRED!!", and 8) are usually very immature about their posts.
Given, there are exceptions, and immaturity on a site for a game is okay (in general, though since this game is technically for adults, this shouldn't be an issue.) I've seen this time and time again, and you have to understand, from where I'm standing it gets very, very annoying.
1
Yeah, a Blizzcast was ruled out. Supposedly, the next two Blizzcasts will not be Diablo-related. That's also a good thing- it could mean that they're too busy (the Diablo team) to do a Blizzcast.
1
That really has nothing to do with the angel itself.
That's exactly what I'm saying. They're beyond our rules. It's obviously going to confuse us because it would be like trying to define a banana with HTML- we are something completely different than them.
If were are to assume that there are angels, then we have to assume we, too, have spirituality. That is the level, then, that a "spirit" would communicate on. But, in another sense, if you assume there are angels, then something must have created them, unless you want to buy in to some kind of spiritual evolution or something, like some new agers do. If we are to assume then, for sake of argument, that angels do exist, and that they also have a creator, we would have to assume that the same being created our spirituality, and, thus, everything that would come along with that, primarily meaning everything, at which point the creator would be called "god". And if this god were to create everything, he or she would have no chains to our rules, and thus be able to change them or go beyond them at anytime he/she so wishes. So, this god could command the angel to appear to deliver some kind of divine message, and then take whatever necessary steps he or she so chooses to keep that creature from being defined quantitatively.