Well, the problem is people skip ahead, and say for arguments sake do "cow" runs, while higher levels kill and you gain levels. The way they fixed this in d2 was limited the amount of xp they gave and what not, for certain levels.
The reason people did this, it just was so much faster, why do the slow way, when you could have higher levels grind you up to 90s?
I don't see them doing that in D3, they didn't even do it in D2 (except maybe the ancients?) as far as "forced leveling"
They'll probably end up doing something like they have in Diablo II now
Where you do tristram runs for so many levels then you do act 2 runs.
Id like to see like end act rushes for certain level caps like
Normal act I Leoric tomb runs level 13-20 (most exp gain)
Normal act II _ _ _ _ _ runs level 20-28 (ideal exp)
and so forth.
I think of they balance the game around that, it would make it a lot more fun.
A fair, and even transition between a certain level gap and the acts/bosses.
Instead of doing like LVL 1-30 on a lower tier something and then grinding 55-99 on a higher tier which gets old fast in PVM.
If they balanced it out evenly, it would keep the game fresh, and would keep people thinking "man I cant wait to do the next tier dungeon raids, the gear is so much better"
If they did something like that, and kept it somewhat fast (no where near mmo leveling times) You'd have a pretty fun game imo.
I am leaning towards wizard at the moment (I just love teleport) but if they announce something that appears to be more fun I may roll it.
But I'll probably roll a witch doctor if there are too many wizard, but it just seems kind of weak casting locust swarm and a few little baby mongrels on a boss that is 15x larger than me.
0
The reason people did this, it just was so much faster, why do the slow way, when you could have higher levels grind you up to 90s?
I don't see them doing that in D3, they didn't even do it in D2 (except maybe the ancients?) as far as "forced leveling"
They'll probably end up doing something like they have in Diablo II now
Where you do tristram runs for so many levels then you do act 2 runs.
Id like to see like end act rushes for certain level caps like
Normal act I Leoric tomb runs level 13-20 (most exp gain)
Normal act II _ _ _ _ _ runs level 20-28 (ideal exp)
and so forth.
I think of they balance the game around that, it would make it a lot more fun.
A fair, and even transition between a certain level gap and the acts/bosses.
Instead of doing like LVL 1-30 on a lower tier something and then grinding 55-99 on a higher tier which gets old fast in PVM.
If they balanced it out evenly, it would keep the game fresh, and would keep people thinking "man I cant wait to do the next tier dungeon raids, the gear is so much better"
If they did something like that, and kept it somewhat fast (no where near mmo leveling times) You'd have a pretty fun game imo.
AFI - my 2 copper
0
2. the other day the blizz rep on the d3 forums said that there is no set-in-stone max number at the moment.
0
Another year!
I was looking at Sep/October release :confused:
0
But I'll probably roll a witch doctor if there are too many wizard, but it just seems kind of weak casting locust swarm and a few little baby mongrels on a boss that is 15x larger than me.
0
Wizard
Barbarian
??x2
Anyone made up there minds yet or going to wait on release of the other 2 classes?
0