• 0

    posted a message on Blizzard Entertainment at PAX - Diablo 3 will be there too!
    Yeah man, they only do stuff on the West Coast of the USA and nothing in Australia either! Crazy. ;)
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 0

    posted a message on Max Players = 4?
    I usually played with 4-5 people in D2 anyway unless we were doing runs or whatever
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo 3 not till 2011 or beyond.
    I will 100% guarantee you that they wont release 3 games in one year. Especially considering a lot of people play all 3 games and will only have enough money for 1-2. It's just silly.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on bind-on-equip
    I reckon it's good. Lets be honest - while the D2 economy was fun it was very, very flawed. I'm glad they are taking big steps to try and fix it. There are always going to be positives and negatives with whatever trading system they decide on, though.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo 2 Itch
    I usually play again once every couple of years. I started again this year (downloaded from Blizzard site) played for a good 3 months or so. Don't think I will play again before D3 but with talk of this new patch I might have to...
    Posted in: Diablo II
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo 3 not till 2011 or beyond.
    They definately haven't finished 4 characters yet. They are still changing skill animations etc. (and the skills themselves)
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How to make gold usefull? My 2 cents.
    Gambling? What an original idea. I wish they thought of that for Diablo 2. ^_^
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Monk Trailer - 720p
    Jesus that trailer is terrible. Luckily the gameplay vids were so awesome.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Ranger class sort of confirmed?
    Quote from "Shiman" »
    Yeah, if you had to really steriotype and pick the 3 remaining classes from a hat it would likely be a ranger type class, a healer type class and a mage type class. Obviously Blizzard will put a cool spin on this and make them unique and specalised, but I predict this will be the general concept.

    ~Shiman

    Have you played Diablo before dude? No healer classes. And a Mage class has already been announced.
    Posted in: Unannounced Class
  • 0

    posted a message on How will you pass the time?
    I will live life (boring, I know)
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on U.S. Diablo III Character Page Updated
    Yeah, the in-game cut scene they showed us was pretty terrible to be honest. I hope there are still big, epic cutscenes like in Diablo 2. I loved those.
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 0

    posted a message on New Diablo 3 Character Class: The Monk!
    Quote from "ydemonhunter" »
    Want to know the truth? We can expect any class now...
    who expected that the fourth class was the Monk?
    Luckily for me his came. :)
    And why paladin again...?
    but... who knows?

    Quite a few people expected that the 4th/5th class would be a Monk or something like it actually
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 0

    posted a message on Wizards New stoneskin name
    Crystal Shell
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • 0

    posted a message on Discussion: The last class is NOT a ranged class
    Think that the glaringly obvious choice for the 5th class is a cross between the Amazon and the Druid.
    Posted in: Unannounced Class
  • 0

    posted a message on Bashiok on "Diablo 3 Battle.net Fees"
    Quote from "Seth" »


    @ valeo: You do realize that Blizzard holds the chips here, right? Without Blizzard, Activision would lose immense power and profit. As far as I've seen, Activision has not affected what stuff is implemented in a game or how a game is developed. I haven't heard of anything of them for a long time in relation to Blizzard, actually.


    Yes, I realise that Activfision-Blizzard is simply the publishing company and not really anything to do with the development studio but I still think it's not really a coincidence that as soon as Activision jumped on board Starcraft 2 suddenly split into a trilogy that would cost not $60-80 but $160-200. Each game will also 'add something to the multiplayer game' according to Joystiq so you are basically forced to buy 3 copies of one game. I've still not seen a believable justifcation for that from Blizzard.

    I suppose i'm just suspicious of it because Activision is pretty much the polar opposite of what Blizzard tries to be as a company. Activision takes a franchise and milks it for all it's worth until it dies a sad death.
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.