Quote from@ Valeo: I think not. I heard them speak about 'a certain amount of customizability' aswell.
From kotatku: http://kotaku.com/5020516/blizzard-worldwide-invitational-diablo-iii-in+depth
"Unlike Warcraft, this is not a game about crafting your own unique virtual persona. Other than the classes and the gender, avatars aren’t customisable; instead the idea is to “dive right in and get to the monster killing”
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Have you played Diablo before dude? No healer classes. And a Mage class has already been announced.
0
0
0
Quite a few people expected that the 4th/5th class would be a Monk or something like it actually
0
0
0
Yes, I realise that Activfision-Blizzard is simply the publishing company and not really anything to do with the development studio but I still think it's not really a coincidence that as soon as Activision jumped on board Starcraft 2 suddenly split into a trilogy that would cost not $60-80 but $160-200. Each game will also 'add something to the multiplayer game' according to Joystiq so you are basically forced to buy 3 copies of one game. I've still not seen a believable justifcation for that from Blizzard.
I suppose i'm just suspicious of it because Activision is pretty much the polar opposite of what Blizzard tries to be as a company. Activision takes a franchise and milks it for all it's worth until it dies a sad death.