Its...
Starcraft 2
http://pc.ign.com/articles/788/788627p1.html
- Sabacca50
- Registered User
-
Member for 17 years, 6 months, and 1 day
Last active Thu, Jan, 29 2009 00:17:42
- 1 Follower
- 380 Total Posts
- 2 Thanks
-
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Screens from this year...Posted in: News
http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/788/788627/blizzards-worldwide-invitational-begins-20070518082209886-000.jpg
http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/788/788627/blizzards-worldwide-invitational-begins-20070518082208620-000.jpg
http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/788/788627/blizzards-worldwide-invitational-begins-20070518082207339-000.jpg
http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/788/788627/blizzards-worldwide-invitational-begins-20070518082203323-000.jpg -
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "NoExplanation" »What is this video about?
Again youtube blocked by my firewall at work. Don't make me call my wife at home. She is crazy.
Its about the illuminati... -
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Well... I feel bad about the Indian video... so why not one that is more interesting...Posted in: News
http://youtube.com/watch?v=E3biFKW_vWY -
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!dude, my friend just sent me it. I watched it... something to do to past the time...Posted in: News
-
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!print screen....Posted in: News
-
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Project "Medusa" wouldn't make sense if it were ghost...Posted in: News
-
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!I played SC ghost at E32006, and it was good! However, there is no way in hell they would re-announce it like this!Posted in: News
-
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "NoExplanation" »Got a link?
From Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_(computer_game)
(I also read it in an interview with blizz, but I dont know where it is)
"Many hints for quests that never made it into the final game can still be viewed on the game's main data file. These include "Izual, the Fallen Angel", in which the player talks to Gillian the barmaid and receives a quest to find and destroy Izual to release his tormented soul. The reward of this quest was likely Azurewrath, a unique sword. Both the quest and the sword were used separately in Diablo II. Another quest involved hunting down the demon queen Andariel. This character appeared later as a boss in Diablo II."
You were correct in a sense in saying Izual, but the question was pertaining to a boss. -
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "NoExplanation" »Baal was supposed to be in Diablo 1. Its a loaded question then. Izual would be the only other character I could think of, and he is not a, "Boss."
The correct answer is Andariel. -
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "NoExplanation" »Baal.. need 6 more text to submit.. think I got it now..
Incorrect... -
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "Orions_Landing" »hmmm Mephy?
Incorrect... Guess again -
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!TRIVIA QUESTION 1Posted in: News
Whats Boss in D2 was supposed to be originally in Diablo 1? -
May 18, 2007Sabacca50 posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Dude page 66!Posted in: News
666 Diablo! - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diablo III is based off Diablo II, and Diablo, which means it is not based off any other intellectual property or source.
Diablo
|
Diablo II - LOD
|
Diablo III (presumably)
As this graph illustrates, Diablo II is directly linked to Diablo III.
Now...
Bill Gates
|
Microsoft
|
Blizzard - Diablo III
|
Blizzard North
|
Diablo
|
Diablo II
Bill Gates only directly influenced Microsoft. Everything else, is just an indirect action, relying on many other people. So, Bill Gates indirectly contributed to Diablo III. Yea, sure. But did he directly do anything, NO.
Blizzard North created the series, and is the primary reference that Blizzard is using in creating Diablo III. Therefor, Blizzard is using work and ideas from Blizzard North to create Diablo III.
You can't write a research paper and not cite the authors of quotes you use!
As an example, I am sure that there will be many things in Diablo III that were in Diablo II, like item names and spells, which were created for Diablo/II by Blizzard North. I say, credit worthy.
0
LinkX, you seem to not understand direct and indirect connection. Atari, Bill Gates, Thomas Edison, and Gutenburg all affected many things directly. However, the argument that Bill Gates (or any of the others) directly influenced Blizzard North's Diablo or Diablo II, is far fetched.
And LinkX, don't quote yourself...
0
Indirectly, the Roman empire influenced our lives today. Sure, this is true, but they do not have any direct affect to our current lives.
Similarly, you can point out that you are alive directly because of your parents. However, because of a decision to keep a child back in 20,000 BC, instead of sacrificing it to the gods, you indirectly owe your existence to this decision. (This is a theoretical situation to show a point)
As you can see, time effects direct and indirect influences.
As for Blizzard North, they are a direct influence for Diablo III, even if they did not work on the game. They made the first 2 games, and presumably, help start the third, and might have even finished it before they scrapped it.
Blizzard North should be credited because they started the franchise, and made every single Diablo game to date. Also, Blizzard is only going off Blizzard North's Diablo and Diablo II to make Diablo III, making Blizzard North a direct and primary influence.
Please, no more Roman Empire garbage. Besides, the Romans stole everything from the Greeks...
0
-It doesn't mean anything. Some people who got hired to work on Warcraft III, actually never touched the game. They worked on WoW.
0
Team 3 may be Team Blizzard North...
Diablo 3 would be their third game...
D3 will be in 3D...
This BlizzCon, is the 3rd one...
1 + 1 + 1 = 3
!
0
Seriously, it's coming...
0
0
3D wont be bad if:
-It doesn't slow or change the gameplay (random levels in 3D is a little tricky...)
-Fixed Classic Style Isometric Camera
-High Quality Detail with little to zero pixilation/fuzz. (I expect Diablo III to look insane!)