• 1

    posted a message on Wait i'm confused thought diablofans shut down like 6 months or more ago?
    Quote from overrider»

    That's the official version. I think there is more than that. I think blizz needs all available advertising platforms to hype their stuff and the closing of diablofans was a big hit . They knew d4 and stuff is coming and I think and it's just my feeling that they had a part to play in reopening this site . There are a lot of people like me who don't surf the official diablo forums and instead use only dfans. It was unacceptable for this site to close when so much diablo is going to happen.

    More people use reddit and social media afaik. That's probably not the case. Fan sites don't really get the support like they used to--a lot of them have to claw for it. I'm glad it reopened, though.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How would you improve Diablo 3?
    Quote from Alessar»

    - Decrease legendary drops and make them feel more rare and unique.

    - Rework and balance item so that blue and yellow items can be viable at level 70 instead of being just a source for crafting materials.




    - Back with the pvp challenge mode from D2 or make those arenas available for players to have fun in.

    Strongly agree with these. The other bigger issue for me was definitely thematic, and I'm not just talking about the visual style. Vanilla D3 was very opposite of the message of the original series. I'm hoping what's-his-face is really bringing this back around, but I guess we'll see.


    It feels like even playing a fresh character you get into uniques and sets almost immediately. In 2, you sometimes had normal-quality stuff with gems through most of normal, with an odd runeword (lod) or set piece here or there if you knew what you were doing. I don't like feeling like a decked-out war god so quickly.


    They really should have gotten pvp arenas set up besides the one. I remember from BlizzCon or was it the WWI they showed off a couple with interesting LOS and traps and stuff and I was actually excited for that. Arenas would be perfect for Diablo.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Blizzard President about Diablo Immortal: “we’re happy with how it’s coming along”
    Quote from Aerisot»

    Honestly, I have nothing against Immortal, it was just unfortunately, wrong place, wrong time, very wrong question. (don't you have phones?)

    I don't really either, honestly. But the PR around it was wrong, and any fan could have told them it was going to turn out poorly. The best solution would have literally just been a slide that publicly said the sequel was currently in development with like a piece of art, followed by a "we don't have anything else to say right now but it's coming." It felt odd at best and wrong at worst, and I think it speaks to either losing touch with the fanbase or losing the authority to communicate effectively due to decisions higher up.


    I guess you're not saying any of that, but for discussion's sake I figured I'd say it :shrug:

    Posted in: Diablo: Immortal
  • 0

    posted a message on Blizzard President about Diablo Immortal: “we’re happy with how it’s coming along”
    Quote from Zooheaded»

    They should have announced their progress on their other diablo titles instead of expecting people to eat their shit and love it for diablo immortal.


    I honestly assumed they weren't going to make this game anymore since I haven't heard a peep since it was announced.

    From what I vaguely remember from some random mutuals, they were planning on a D4 announcement within a couple weeks of the event but it got pulled for some reason. D4 being announced isn't even really a shocker, I'm pretty sure it was lowkey confirmed by implication shortly after the con last year.

    Posted in: Diablo: Immortal
  • 0

    posted a message on Ultimate Random Chat Thread [URT] v4
    Quote from Ducha»

    Here's to hoping a few people will stop by and say g'day :P

    Posted in: Off-Topic
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo 4 Reportedly in Development Under Code Name Fenris
    Quote from Foensh»

    What a load of BS...

    This corroborates a lot of developments over the last several years, as well as other independent statements over the last couple months. Anyone that didn't think they were working on 4 were pretty wonky in the head as the writing has been on the wall for some time. That's what made the fact it wasn't announced even more frustrating.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo Immortal: What a MMOARPG should be IMHO
    Quote from Medievaldragon»

    Quote from vinnehehe»

    what a great word that is:

    mobile massive online action role playing game.


    I'm actually just left wondering what an MMO should look like. To me, Diablo in general is not an MMO.

    I think Massive multiplayer online is where a lot of people are online in the same game at the same time. (not just a 4 man group) so MO ARPG.


    so as to the mobile game, I'm taking a pass here for sure. I'm just sooo not interested in gaming on a mobile device. I'm not a die hard console or pc guy I play whichever suits me best for the specific game I want to play. (or which platform allows me to play it in general given pc is not high end)

    But mobile just doesn't suit me at all. It feels like a waste of time to me.


    I have a game in my Nvidia Shield Tablet -- I think it's named Trine 2 or something like that. Heck, that tablet has an Nvidia Steam-like platform to play many games. Never played them.

    TBH Trine is an amazing game. The original actually did remarkably well and is both simple and creative. It was fun 3-player coop on my ps3, never played it mobile though.

    I'm honestly probably not going to even play this game because it's not being made for me, but there's the usual caveats of it being in very early development. They don't even have the inventory system down yet.


    That said, what you show up there just looks like a mini-map from like a linear final fantasy title. Very disheartening. There's dialogue from the WoW team now and then, and other MMOs, about developing a true open world and just building a world designed to push players through sight-seeing tunnels. The latter is usually lacking in replayability.

    Posted in: Diablo: Immortal
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo IV and Diablo II: Remastered in Development

    Thanks for putting all of that together. There's a ton of interesting stuff like this coming out recently, and going back for a while. It's hard to keep it all straight. (Seriously thank you. +1)


    On the domain level, at least for 3, I don't think it was finalized until like... very shortly before they were going to announce it. Weren't we given like 30 days or something? So, just because it's sitting in limbo doesn't mean it's not in the works, which tbh we all know is absolutely the case.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on CM Nevalistis enjoyed it
    Quote from head0r»

    as paradox as it now is, i even would have welcomed some mobile diablo action from netease probably without any afterthought if blizzard would've shown d4 before / after. really strange when you look at it now. :D

    Yeah, literally just a big 4 on a slide would have been enough for me honestly. I don't want them to fall into the trap with D3 either where they announced and showed too much stuff far too early and what we got wasn't what was originally shown/said. But literally just a "it's in the works" would have been worlds better. We all already know it's in the works at this point, anyway, and we've seen a couple interviews over the last couple weeks post-BlizzCon pretty much confirming D4 is both in the works and was meant to be announced at the con and wasn't.


    I think also working out a deal where "Netease" wasn't the first thing we saw on primetime BlizzCon on the main stage before a major announcement would have been nice. Seeing a totally separate company splashed across a Blizzard convention seems like bad faith, and it felt bad to me. (Although my understanding from talking to people since is that they technically already help Blizzard with a lot of overseas stuff with some of their games.)

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Book of Adria for sale at BlizzCon, release delayed/TBA sometime after

    How much ?

    I would assume the same price as the previous entries but idk. Amazon is listing it at $26.99, but that may be some sort of pre-order special. A full-price new version of the Tyrael one runs $29.95.


    Also, just spitballing here, but I doubt they'll be in the Gear Store or they'd be open to virtual attendees which could conflict with a publishing/release agreement? It might be its own separate thing at the con. (Again, just putting that out there, I have no idea.)

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Book of Adria for sale at BlizzCon, release delayed/TBA sometime after

    For anyone that keeps up with the supplementary lore materials, the Book of Adria, which follows its predecessors like the Book of Cain and Book of Tyrael, has been delayed for the masses, but they did some sketchy stuff and are bringing some to the con ahead of schedule. The actual release date of the book will come sometime after the con, hopefully "soon" after.

    Hey everyone! Wanted to update you all on Book of Adria. Bottom line first: The release date has been pushed back. I don’t have an exact ETA yet, but the copies are en route from the printer and we hope to announce the availability date soon. It will be after BlizzCon. Some good news: We will have the book available AT BlizzCon! Our products team is going to great lengths to make sure we get some early copies there. @Burnzerker and I should be on hand for signings, too!
    ~Robert Brooks, Blizzard Writer
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Monomona's Introduction

    D1 is still distributed and supported by Blizzard so I don't think it's abandonware :P


    But welcome!

    Posted in: Introduction
  • 0

    posted a message on D3-Styled Nintendo Switch, Case, In-Game Goodies

    Le link.



    We’re only a few weeks away from Diablo III Eternal Collection arriving on the Nintendo Switch, along with oodles of fun demon slaying, loot hunting, and memory-making, with local and online co-op!

    While it’s nice being able to take the Burning Hells with you wherever you go, we’ve got another surprise up our sleeve. Together with Nintendo, we’ve created the Nintendo Switch Diablo III Eternal Collection Bundle, packed with enough sweet loot to make even Greed herself jealous.

    The Nintendo Switch Diablo III Eternal Collection Bundle includes a Diablo III-themed Nintendo Switch system and dock, a Diablo III-edition carrying case, and a download code for Diablo III Eternal Collection. This definitive edition of Diablo III includes the Reaper of Souls expansion, the Rise of the Necromancer content pack, and every feature and update added to the game to date. Switch players also get a cosmetic armor set inspired by Ganondorf, the infamous villain from The Legend of Zelda series, and other Hyrule-themed goodies!

    Whether you’re a veteran of the Eternal Conflict or a newcomer eager to slay your first demon, there’s no better way to bring the never-ending adventure of Diablo III with you. These special edition Nintendo Switch consoles are in limited supply, so be sure to catch one before they disappear like a Treasure Goblin through a portal!

    Check out Gamestop.com for more details on how to score one of your very own.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Next DIablo Project Leaked on Blizzard Store
    Quote from Elusion»

    Quote from Aerisot»

    Diablo: Reign of Terror has been a slogan for years when it comes to merchandise.


    What is fascinating to me though is the Panel on day two titled "Diablo: World and Q&A" that leads me to believe that this will be a global game, much like an MMO is, even more interesting is that when you go to Diablo4.com the domain is still up for sale, however, if you go to Diabloworld.com it is now already owned by Godaddy, who Blizzard uses quite frequently when they want to save a domain name.


    the dominion is registered to 1997 ;) . i don't think blizzard working to mmo in 1997 ;).

    In addition to what aeri was saying and if you want some Sunday reading, the first iteration of Diablo 3 by Blizzard North was planned to be an MMO. I forget what magazine ran it, but I remember in like 2011 or 2012 it might have been GI ran one with lots of screenshots from Blizzard North's early Diablo 3 build--since I couldn't find that, here's just a Q&A.


    Julian Love did an interview years later stating that the reboot the new Diablo team started in like 2005/2006 was briefly discussed as being an MMO, but they decided against it.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on D3 Cross-Platform Play Inc
    Quote from huertgenwald»

    Debunked.


    “While we love the idea of bringing our players together across platforms, we do not have any plans to implement cross-platform gameplay for Diablo at this time.”

    Well, shit. There's a big -1 to my reading comprehension. Got too excited.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.