Quote from Reaperherpderp
Quote from Deathkiss
Quote from Reaperherpderp
PLUS makes it super easy for the scrubs/idiots who are to retarded/lazy/dumb to do it. WIN
No one is too retared or dumb to do it. It's a few button clicks. No ones too lazy to do it either.
The problem is that its an action game, and you shouldn't have to do tedious, clunky, menu driven stuff in middle of action based combat to play effectively.
Maybe people who can't understand that argument are the "retarded" ones. Or... maybe people like that hope throwing insults arround will cloud the issue and keep people from noticing that the current MF swap mechanics feel cheesy, sloppy, and a bit stupid.
And people like you will be the FIRST ones complaining on how this loot based game is not dropping good loot anymore. People that MF swap were unhappy about the bad loot drops before, but we kept farming and MF swapping, because this is a FARMING GAME.
its the people like you who dont put on the MF gear and dont put in the effort of farming that QQ the hardest. you expect to find 10 million gold items every half hour. the game doesnt work like that.
Credibility instantly goes to zero when, in an attempt to insult people who are apparently "retarded," you fail to utilize the correct "too."
You must be too retarded/lazy/dumb to learn English.
GTFO
0
So what you're saying is that you would be happy if they made it so in Act 3 you only got a single (that's 1, one, uno) drop approximately 65.1% of the time, out of which a 61 item would drop 27.1% of the time, a 62 item 21.7% of the time, and a 63 item 16.3% of the time?
Because you would still get items at exactly the same rate, only without all that "trash." Unfortunately, you would probably cry foul claiming drops are nerfed because you don't get an item every time, and most of them are trash rolls to boot.
For reference:
0
You don't get to just make definitions up. I went out of my way to look it up because you're being thick in the skull and refuse to simply accept that people making statements are not voicing their opinion, but spewing verbal diarrhea out of emotional distress over something as simple as a game.
If you or anyone else wish to make their opinion known, be my guest. However, when you do so, do it in a constructive manner or not at all. That's my point, and everyone else who is telling people who are exaggerating conditions to shove off.
There are no semantics being argued here. If you wish to list your grievances without blowing them out of proportion, please do so. I will happily discuss them in the manner they are presented. If they are all "this game is trash," don't expect an elaborate response in return.
Edit - know, known, psh.
0
To clarify - you're wrong. By definition an opinion is:
1.
a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty; A view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
Stating something is broken is just that: a statement. A statement is a declaration of the state or condition of something, otherwise known as fact. An opinion, while sometimes based on facts, is not a fact itself, which is why it is called an opinion. As such, a statement cannot be an opinion.
With that out of the way, stating the game is broken is absolutely, positively, not an opinion. If you do make that statement, and you do not explain why you believe that to be the case, you are subject to mockery based on your unabashed use of hyperbole entirely for the sake of being dumb on the internet.
I really cannot fathom why this matter is such a difficult concept to grasp.
0
Random forum troll philosophy: make up numbers, ignore reality, post stupid trash lolroflcopterskates.
0
The difference is that one requires critical thinking to realize it's exactly the same as the other way, just far faster and more efficient (using a universal currency). Also, it's one more thing to complain about without fully understanding it.
Tough to say which factor is more determinant in this issue.
0
With that said, if you are killing packs in a bugged manner repeatedly to earn "extra" loot, don't be shocked if you earn yourself an account suspension or outright ban for exploitation of mechanics.
0
Oh now you've done it. You'll be labeled as a hater in no time.
0
I guess I should have edited it to read "do you comprehend it," because it's quite apparent you do not.
Continue in your misunderstanding of what an opinion actually is, and what it represents. The rest of us will get a hearty chuckle at your misappropriation of colloquial terminology in what should be an intelligent discussion.
The end.
PS: you should get rid of that signature - you look silly.
0
Except that my post was aimed at those who are complaining about the idea that perfectly rolled rares will still be better than a perfect legendary. That expectation is based entirely in their own ideology on what a legendary item should represent, and not the reality of what it always has in Diablo.
I'm with you on the fact that legendary items right now are a huge disappointment. I've found over a dozen myself, and all of them were incredibly underwhelming (and I knew they would be before I ID'd them). I want that to change with everyone else. But I'm also aware of what their status and role in this game is intended to be (as I know you are) - there are just plenty of people who apparently don't grasp that, and don't care to try and understand.
0
Tinfoil hat to the rescue!
0
0
Which is why they're buffing them. In case you forgot. Which is what we're talking about. Speculation is fun though.
1
First, they claim that crit is OP and unfair because Demon Hunters can stack so much of it, and then directly contradicts that by saying eventually everyone will have it.
So, what's the claim? That the game will be too easy? PvP will be too crazy? Lack of statistic diversity? Lack of build diversity?
From what I'm reading, the issue is lack of patience and a sense of entitlement (go figure). The game has been out two months and people already want things nerfed to make it easier to acquire, or less of a gap between the top and bottom. Christ, what a depressing state of affairs this new generation of gamers has come into.
0
Stop trying to compare my post to his, you're comparing apples to giraffes.
Where did I ever say he wasn't entitled to that opinion? No, see, my point was that his opinion was actually encroaching on a claim of fact, rather than simply saying "I dislike this game."
For the final time, since I'm going to take your signature as true and assume you're just being dense: saying something is broken is not the same as saying "I don't like this." Huge difference. Black and white. Are you getting it yet?
0
There's quite a significant difference in expressing dislike for something and engaging in blatant hyperbole for which you provide absolutely no detail to back that claim up.
You wouldn't know "fanboi-ism" if it slapped you in the face. I'm a fanboi of common sense and intelligent rhetoric, not frothing at the mouth and licking windows while generalizing hate at something you can't even begin to describe.
Thanks for the attempt to clear things up, though.