PlugY for Diablo II allows you to reset skills and stats, transfer items between characters in singleplayer, obtain all ladder runewords and do all Uberquests while offline. It is the only way to do all of the above. Please use it.
Supporting big shoulderpads and flashy armor since 2004.
We don't acknowledge Condor Studios. They are the ones that had practically made the entire game before Blizzard bought them out. I don't even think Condor got a mention in the credits.
So why should Blizzard North be any different.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
We don't acknowledge Condor Studios. They are the ones that had practically made the entire game before Blizzard bought them out. I don't even think Condor got a mention in the credits.
anyways i think Blizzard North should be put up there or it wont feel like diablo to me
Because having the lone warrior going up against hells demonic army and finnally a massive 1 on 1 against Diablo himself, all with a middle ages sense is NOT what makes Diablo Diablo. It's the name "Blizzard North" that makes it Diablo, right?
Sorry, I just found that incredibly funny...
Anyway, if Blizzard North doesnt work on it, they don't get there name on it. If Activision works on it, they get there name on it. If you work on it, you deserve to be recognized.
That is a pretty huge point in the creation of Diablo.
Anyway, if Blizzard North doesnt work on it, they don't get there name on it. If Activision works on it, they get there name on it. If you work on it, you deserve to be recognized.
But did they? aren't activision just the parent company now that it joined with whatever, sorry I don't care to much for which company owns Blizzard. It used to be Bob and Jan Davidson at one point though and their company Davidson Games or something.
Diablo III is supposedly near complete, or rather initial release state, (probably gonna be a few rapidly released patches) so the single parent company they had before the merger should get a mention, as they always do, but this new one that came in, activision (if activision is the old one then whatitzface shouldn't get the mention). They probably didn't do a thing at all. Their only association with the game is they are now the parent compnay of Blizzard.
If I do a huge report of something and my Dad helps me, and then he got remarried shortly before I handed it in why should I acknowledge my stepmom if she didn't help at all. Sure she was around, but she didnt help with my report.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
That is a pretty huge point in the creation of Diablo.
But did they? aren't activision just the parent company now that it joined with whatever, sorry I don't care to much for which company owns Blizzard. It used to be Bob and Jan Davidson at one point though and their company Davidson Games or something.
Diablo III is supposedly near complete, or rather initial release state, (probably gonna be a few rapidly released patches) so the single parent company they had before the merger should get a mention, as they always do, but this new one that came in, activision (if activision is the old one then whatitzface shouldn't get the mention). They probably didn't do a thing at all. Their only association with the game is they are now the parent compnay of Blizzard.
If I do a huge report of something and my Dad helps me, and then he got remarried shortly before I handed it it why should I acknowledge my stepmom if she didn't help at all. Sure she was around, but she didnt help with my report.
Its still Vivendi that is the parent company to Activision and Blizzard.
Blizzard North is gone, along with Blizzard East or w/e. You know, the company that worked on Stacraft. If folks from North did work on it, they will get named in the credit but the company itself is non-existant.
If you don't work on a project you don't get credit. Otherwise I would like a random Ubisoft logo in there. Just cause I think it would be funny to see it.
Because having the lone warrior going up against hells demonic army and finnally a massive 1 on 1 against Diablo himself, all with a middle ages sense is NOT what makes Diablo Diablo. It's the name "Blizzard North" that makes it Diablo, right?
Sorry, I just found that incredibly funny...
Anyway, if Blizzard North doesnt work on it, they don't get there name on it. If Activision works on it, they get there name on it. If you work on it, you deserve to be recognized.
no it wouldnt be the same... anyways why do you have to be so confrontational? i had an opinion dont shit a brick over it.
I would be pretty happy if they finally announced Team 3 is Blizzard North re-made or something.. so we get to see a new Blizzard North logo graphic at the start of the game!
no it wouldnt be the same... anyways why do you have to be so confrontational? i had an opinion dont shit a brick over it.
I didn't mean to be confrontational. I just found it funny.
Come on, Jimmy made Game One and Game Two but not Game Three. He deserves to be in the credits because it's tradition and it makes the game "Game" what it is? That makes no sense. Jimmy isn't what brings you in. Jimmy isn't the story of Game. Jimmy is not the game play. Jimmy is simply not Game.
I agree - if Blizzard north didn't make the final version of Diablo III - then you will mostly likely only see Blizzard's new graphical logo at the start instead of both Blizzard and Blizzard North
They didn't start the franchise. Condor Studios did. Had Blizzard not bought them out, Condor would have released Diablo.
Might not have been as good, as Blizzard North did rework parts of it. But the majority of the game was made by Condor.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
Now on the other hand, I do not want Activision put on there, don't know if it will.
So why should Blizzard North be any different.
holy shit i didnt know about that!?
*edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flagship_Studios ftw
anyways i think Blizzard North should be put up there or it wont feel like diablo to me
Because having the lone warrior going up against hells demonic army and finnally a massive 1 on 1 against Diablo himself, all with a middle ages sense is NOT what makes Diablo Diablo. It's the name "Blizzard North" that makes it Diablo, right?
Sorry, I just found that incredibly funny...
Anyway, if Blizzard North doesnt work on it, they don't get there name on it. If Activision works on it, they get there name on it. If you work on it, you deserve to be recognized.
That is a pretty huge point in the creation of Diablo.
But did they? aren't activision just the parent company now that it joined with whatever, sorry I don't care to much for which company owns Blizzard. It used to be Bob and Jan Davidson at one point though and their company Davidson Games or something.
Diablo III is supposedly near complete, or rather initial release state, (probably gonna be a few rapidly released patches) so the single parent company they had before the merger should get a mention, as they always do, but this new one that came in, activision (if activision is the old one then whatitzface shouldn't get the mention). They probably didn't do a thing at all. Their only association with the game is they are now the parent compnay of Blizzard.
If I do a huge report of something and my Dad helps me, and then he got remarried shortly before I handed it in why should I acknowledge my stepmom if she didn't help at all. Sure she was around, but she didnt help with my report.
Elfen wins.
Blizzard North is gone, along with Blizzard East or w/e. You know, the company that worked on Stacraft. If folks from North did work on it, they will get named in the credit but the company itself is non-existant.
If you don't work on a project you don't get credit. Otherwise I would like a random Ubisoft logo in there. Just cause I think it would be funny to see it.
no it wouldnt be the same... anyways why do you have to be so confrontational? i had an opinion dont shit a brick over it.
I didn't mean to be confrontational. I just found it funny.
Come on, Jimmy made Game One and Game Two but not Game Three. He deserves to be in the credits because it's tradition and it makes the game "Game" what it is? That makes no sense. Jimmy isn't what brings you in. Jimmy isn't the story of Game. Jimmy is not the game play. Jimmy is simply not Game.
To find the truth, you must risk everything.
Might not have been as good, as Blizzard North did rework parts of it. But the majority of the game was made by Condor.
just imagine diablo not being a blizzard game, that would be weird